Posted 2005-06-27 10:00 AM (#27200 - in reply to #27010) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 366
Location: Albany, Oregon
Originally written by Terri on 2005-06-23 8:03 PM
I have a 2003 2WD. I'll have to wait until the sun comes up to get the numbers for you. But I got the 10,000lb rating out of my manuel and e-mailed Dodge to confirm it. I thought maybe it was a typo but they looked up my vin# and confirmed it.
HMMMM.....!! Terri I have a 2003 2500 4x4 auto 3:73 CTD and I think you have a higher tow rating than mine.....???? I think my manual said 9,980 or there abouts....I think I'll go look at it again...
Posted 2005-06-27 6:42 PM (#27248 - in reply to #26947) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 2689
Originally written by hav2ride on 2005-06-22 7:55 PM
I personally KNOW that bigger wheels = better braking. I had an F350 dually that I pulled a 29' box 3 H, mid tack, and LQ with. I traded to an F450 because of the safety and legal issues. The larger wheels/brakes on the F450 can stop my trailer on it's own, not that I would want to haul that way. Pulling a 4H with a 1500 is just not safe in emergency situations.
Ummm, UNLIKELY ! (that your F450 can stop a trailer (that probably outweighs it) in a reasonable distance using only the truck's brakes.)
Physics 101: Coefficient of friction and his/her buddies are against it.
With the truck alone on a good flat dry surface you MIGHT get to 1.0 G decel, but that requires all the mass being slowed to be ON the braking wheels.
With a (brakeless) trailer attached you have less than half the total rig's mass on the slowing wheels - ABS or locked 4 wheels, it just ain't gonna stop as quick.
It will stop, eventually, but it will be a long one.
I'm just guessing that your F450 is a bit lighter than the trailer you cited, it could be less or equal, but as a first approximation you only have half the mass to be stopped weighing down on the stopping wheels, so it doesn't matter how much "better" your brakes are, you just don't have the grip.
None of this should matter, the trailer has to have adequate brakes to stop it, so does the truck. In the event of trailer brake failure you would run into trouble quicker with the lighter vehicle - for SURE !
Posted 2005-06-27 7:02 PM (#27249 - in reply to #27248) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by Reg on 2005-06-27 7:42 PM
Originally written by hav2ride on 2005-06-22 7:55 PM I personally KNOW that bigger wheels = better braking. I had an F350 dually that I pulled a 29' box 3 H, mid tack, and LQ with. I traded to an F450 because of the safety and legal issues. The larger wheels/brakes on the F450 can stop my trailer on it's own, not that I would want to haul that way. Pulling a 4H with a 1500 is just not safe in emergency situations.
Ummm, UNLIKELY ! (that your F450 can stop a trailer (that probably outweighs it) in a reasonable distance using only the truck's brakes.) Physics 101: Coefficient of friction and his/her buddies are against it. With the truck alone on a good flat dry surface you MIGHT get to 1.0 G decel, but that requires all the mass being slowed to be ON the braking wheels. With a (brakeless) trailer attached you have less than half the total rig's mass on the slowing wheels - ABS or locked 4 wheels, it just ain't gonna stop as quick. It will stop, eventually, but it will be a long one. I'm just guessing that your F450 is a bit lighter than the trailer you cited, it could be less or equal, but as a first approximation you only have half the mass to be stopped weighing down on the stopping wheels, so it doesn't matter how much "better" your brakes are, you just don't have the grip. None of this should matter, the trailer has to have adequate brakes to stop it, so does the truck. In the event of trailer brake failure you would run into trouble quicker with the lighter vehicle - for SURE !
youre wasting your time reg. physics elude some people. and again we are splitting hairs, but i have nothing better to do.
if i remember correctly most unladen pickups stop from 60 mph around 150 feet a full grown 18 wheeler @80000# needs around 350 feet. im guessing the loaded trucks were talking about fall somwhere in between. so again im speculating, were only talking about a few feet either way, between small horse rigs vs. larger horse rigs. and im still holding to heavier GCWR taking longer to stop.
i will disagree, partly, with the "trouble quicker with the lighter vehicle" statement though. the lighter vehicle will not have any heavier a load in relation to its own weight. in fact it will likely be less percentage than the heavier 1 ton. and again it also has less total weight to stop with probably similar sized brakes.
1/2 ton 5200# 9300# trailer = 9300/5200=1.78
1 ton 7500# 15600# trailer =15600/7500 =2.08
the only technical advantage may be in the dually with the 2 extra contact patches. the tires on even the smaller trucks are still in the 245mm width.
the 450 does have 15" rotors as compared to 13" on the smaller trucks. this would likely make some difference when switching from "to heavy for 350" that would be at the bottom of the 450's load capacity. which in turn would be like saying my truck stops better with a lawnmower on a utility trailer than it does with my 6000# horse trailer. and you could go a little farther and say my truck stops really well with no trailer, does that make it safer? (well actually it does.) an accurated statement, but not really relavant.
Posted 2005-06-28 8:22 AM (#27264 - in reply to #27248) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1719
Location: PA
Wanna come and see for yourself? Now, There's no way that I would ever drive that way because I would destroy my truck brakes. But I have tested it on my property by taking the rig off the field where we park it, down the bank to the driveway, and it does stop it easily. I do this so that the damp trailer brakes don't lock up on the grass and destroy the grass.
Posted 2005-06-28 8:49 AM (#27265 - in reply to #27264) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by hav2ride on 2005-06-28 9:22 AM
Wanna come and see for yourself? Now, There's no way that I would ever drive that way because I would destroy my truck brakes. But I have tested it on my property by taking the rig off the field where we park it, down the bank to the driveway, and it does stop it easily. I do this so that the damp trailer brakes don't lock up on the grass and destroy the grass.
like i said, i dont doubt it stops better(and better is relative, meaning in this situation "not much") than the 350, but thats because youre not working it as hard. but exactly what kind of "test" is that? im guessing youre not running 60mph in the field down the bank to the driveway.
Posted 2005-06-28 10:46 AM (#27269 - in reply to #26902) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 366
Location: Albany, Oregon
A PANIC do or die STOP (like to hell with the animals I gotta stop....now!) in a full loaded situation on 6% downhill @ 55mph It will feel like it speeds up the closer you get to the target! Cause it kinda does! (been there)!The brakes on everything are extremely HOT! Then they fade! Now what? That happening without trailer brakes would be ...well... not fun! My concept on the design is the truck brakes are sized to handle the trucks maximum payload not the trailer. Now I would haul a heavy trailer around the local area with no brakes, and drive like I had none...cause if somthing happens.....I really don't!
Posted 2005-06-28 11:09 AM (#27271 - in reply to #27265) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1719
Location: PA
Oh, it's much better than the 350 was with the same trailer. The 350 could do it but I did feel like the trailer was really pushing the truck and I had to put heavy pressure on the brakes. The 450 handles it with ease. Whether or not you believe what I say is irrelevant to me.
Posted 2005-06-28 11:09 AM (#27272 - in reply to #27269) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by xyzer on 2005-06-28 11:46 AM
A PANIC do or die STOP (like to hell with the animals I gotta stop....now!) in a full loaded situation on 6% downhill @ 55mph It will feel like it speeds up the closer you get to the target! Cause it kinda does! (been there)!The brakes on everything are extremely HOT! Then they fade! Now what? That happening without trailer brakes would be ...well... not fun! My concept on the design is the truck brakes are sized to handle the trucks maximum payload not the trailer. Now I would haul a heavy trailer around the local area with no brakes, and drive like I had none...cause if somthing happens.....I really don't!
good post, i like to point out, though it looks like you already found out..........55mph is WAY to fast on a 6% grade if your vehicle is loaded heavy. for that matter 55mph is plenty fast period, unless youve got a big stretch of open interstate.
Posted 2005-06-28 11:17 AM (#27273 - in reply to #27271) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by hav2ride on 2005-06-28 12:09 PM
Oh, it's much better than the 350 was with the same trailer. The 350 could do it but I did feel like the trailer was really pushing the truck and I had to put heavy pressure on the brakes. The 450 handles it with ease. Whether or not you believe what I say is irrelevant to me.
im not questioning you, just your interpretation of the situation.
Posted 2005-06-28 11:21 AM (#27274 - in reply to #26902) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 366
Location: Albany, Oregon
The point was a full load in a panic stop at any speed up or downhill 25-65mph will make you wish you had more brakes! Remove the trailer brakes and oh Sh*t! .....the first liar never has a chance!
Posted 2005-06-28 11:49 AM (#27277 - in reply to #26902) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Regular
Posts: 58
Location: Shawnee, Oklahoma
Maybe this is a dumb answer, or maybe it's too obvious, but I see a lot of horse folks come on this board (and on the trailer lot!) trying to match up a 1/2 ton or 3/4 ton truck with too big of a trailer.....So, instead of crunching numbers, if you want to safely haul your horses, why don't you just go trade for a 1 ton truck and be done with it???
I think if you can afford to own horses, and land, or board a horse, buy feed, equipment, entry fees, fuel, vet bills, trailers, etc, then surely you can afford a truck that hauls them safely. I wouldn't own a 1/2 ton truck and pull ANYTHING bigger than a 2 horse BP trailer with a horse in it...sorry, but JMO. Flame away, I have a tough hide.
Posted 2005-06-28 12:36 PM (#27283 - in reply to #27277) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1391
Location: North of Detroit, MI
Cindy of Oklahoma posted: "So, instead of crunching numbers, if you want to safely haul your horses, why don't you just go trade for a 1 ton truck and be done with it??? "
And, as I have said before, will you make my truck, fuel, registration, and insurance payments?
By the way, I drive 44 miles round trip, everyday, for work. I only have 1 vehicle. If I had a bigger truck, I couldn't afford to have a horse and go anyplace.
Posted 2005-06-28 12:46 PM (#27286 - in reply to #26902) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Member
Posts: 32
Location: Brazil, IN
If you can't pull safely, DON'T PULL! That's really the bottom line. If you are worried about your truck pulling the trailer, maybe you should take it for a "test pull," most dealers will let you.
I'm not an expert on any of this, but most 19 year olds aren't. That's why I'm not saying yes or no, but it seems to me there are some people here that think they know way to much (or at least more than what they DO know). I would rather take advice from someone who has a cdl or drives trucks/trailers for a living than some know-it-all who pulls a few times a month which makes them an "expert." If you think bigger is better, more power to you, but it seems like a pretty general idea that may not always be true.
Also, just for the record: Financing for a brand new truck with no trade and no down payment: I figured using prices from a 2005 Dodge 3500 and a 2005 Dodge 2500 and a payment calculator on Fifth Third's website and the difference between the two was a whole $68.00. Doesn't seem like a whole lot to me when it comes to the safety of my horse!
Just my two cents, I'm sure some of ya'll think different, but I suppose that's why we live in America!
Posted 2005-06-28 12:48 PM (#27287 - in reply to #27277) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by HaulinHorses on 2005-06-28 12:49 PM
Maybe this is a dumb answer, or maybe it's too obvious, but I see a lot of horse folks come on this board (and on the trailer lot!) trying to match up a 1/2 ton or 3/4 ton truck with too big of a trailer.....So, instead of crunching numbers, if you want to safely haul your horses, why don't you just go trade for a 1 ton truck and be done with it???
I think if you can afford to own horses, and land, or board a horse, buy feed, equipment, entry fees, fuel, vet bills, trailers, etc, then surely you can afford a truck that hauls them safely. I wouldn't own a 1/2 ton truck and pull ANYTHING bigger than a 2 horse BP trailer with a horse in it...sorry, but JMO. Flame away, I have a tough hide.
no its not a dumb answer, but a 1 ton is certainly overkill for my 6000# loaded trailer. although ill have one directly as a 3rd vehicle, like you said "and be done with it". i dont and never will need a larger trailer, just me and the wife and the camping days are long over....but just in case. as for the other people(and myself at this present time) its simply not always fesible or necessary to have a 1 ton. skill, experiance, and personal saftey comfort levels are also different. they ride like crap so if its your primary ride that is a big turn off. additional taxes, fuel, inital investment etc all also add up. i do agree though, that the people with the larger trailers wondering if they can get by......if you need/can afford that large a trailer a larger truck is not that much more of an investment.
Posted 2005-06-28 12:51 PM (#27288 - in reply to #27286) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by Erin_CBT on 2005-06-28 1:46 PM
I'm not an expert on any of this, but most 19 year olds aren't. That's why I'm not saying yes or no, but it seems to me there are some people here that think they know way to much (or at least more than what they DO know). I would rather take advice from someone who has a cdl or drives trucks/trailers for a living than some know-it-all who pulls a few times a month which makes them an "expert." If you think bigger is better, more power to you, but it seems like a pretty general idea that may not always be true!
dont sell yourself short, it may only take a few years to learn, some people catch on faster.......after all this is not rocket science.
Posted 2005-06-28 3:59 PM (#27306 - in reply to #27286) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 2828
Location: Southern New Mexico
Also, just for the record: Financing for a brand new truck with no trade and no down payment: I figured using prices from a 2005 Dodge 3500 and a 2005 Dodge 2500 and a payment calculator on Fifth Third's website and the difference between the two was a whole $68.00. Doesn't seem like a whole lot to me when it comes to the safety of my horse!
It's not just the $68 a month. There is the difference between what is owed on the old truck and the trade in value, which is added to the new truck and the extra year of payments. The extra gas driving 30 miles one way to go to work and finding a parking space at work. I would love to have a bigger truck, but right now its not possible and since (according to dodge) I am not overloading my truck, it will have to do.
Posted 2005-06-28 8:22 PM (#27321 - in reply to #27286) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1719
Location: PA
Just for the record, so you know my trailering background. My husband started driving trucks for the business he now owns when he was in his teens. He hauled lots of weight on a variety of roads in a variety of conditions including snow and ice. When I started hauling horses, he taught me how. I have been hauling horses, most times long distances, for about 27 years. I also learned a lot from a truck driving friend who learned the ropes from her truck driving father and had a hauling business with her husband. She has also hauled horses and has a tack store that she takes to shows. She actually used to post here on this site but pretty much got tired of the "stuff" that goes on here.
Posted 2005-06-29 7:56 AM (#27347 - in reply to #27274) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1416
Location: sc
Originally written by xyzer on 2005-06-28 12:21 PM
The point was a full load in a panic stop at any speed up or downhill 25-65mph will make you wish you had more brakes! Remove the trailer brakes and oh Sh*t! .....the first liar never has a chance!
well i dont know about that. 25 mph with a load and you should have more than suffiecent braking ability, thats the whole reason speed is supposed to be reduced. i was a little confused as to your point, your example was using a person already making a mistake. if i remember correctly the tractor/trailers are recommened to descend 6% at 35mph. but youre right, no trailer brakes would be a problem.
Posted 2005-06-29 11:03 AM (#27360 - in reply to #26902) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Member
Posts: 32
Location: Brazil, IN
The only point i was trying to make with the figures is can you really put a price on the safety of your horse? If you don't need a one ton, great, but some do even though they won't admit it.
Posted 2005-06-29 12:19 PM (#27368 - in reply to #27360) Subject: RE: Hauling Question
Expert
Posts: 1391
Location: North of Detroit, MI
Erin -
While $68 a month for 5 years might not seem like a great deal regarding the safety of my horse... I must also consider all the other related factors as others have previously pointed out. A larger vehicle means MUCH higher insurance payments, higher registration costs, more fuel (and it's not just the money of more fuel... it's all the political crap that the reliance of more fuel puts on the US and the world).
$68 a month would help me pay for a better barn that would be safer for my horse than the 150 year old one that threatens to drop on his head whenever there's a big snow storm.
$68 a month pays for my cell phone that provides safety for ME - a person living alone and on the road more than 2 hours everyday.
I trailer my horse about 10 - 15 times a year. The truck I have rides so rough when it's empty - it sucks. It's a half-ton with a tow rating of 9300 pounds. I do my best to keep my towed load under 8000 pounds.
Life is all about compromise (give & take) and taking responsibility for our actions. So, for many folks, using a 1/2 ton and towing something that's UNDER the manufacturer's stated limits and within a certain margin for error, is the compromise that we make. Knowing that we have to take responsibility for those actions. It's those that won't accept the responsibility of their risk taking that causes the lawsuits and similar stupidity in the world.