'
1
Forums Albums Skins 1
Search Register Logon


You are logged in as a guest. Logon or register an account to access more features.
OTHER FORUMS:    Barrel Horses  -   Trucks   -   Cutting  -   Reining  -   Roping 
'
WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...

Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Last activity 2008-01-12 6:18 AM
34 replies, 13113 views

View previous thread :: View next thread
   General Discussion -> Trailer Talk  Click to return to Barrel Talk
Refresh
Message format
 
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-12-29 12:32 AM (#73467)
Subject: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont

FMCSA announces registration enforcement rule

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has announced an interim final rule requiring states to place interstate motor carriers out of service and assess penalties for not properly registering with the FMCSA as a for-hire carrier of passengers or freight.

Motor carriers placed out of service may have a hearing within 10 days of the order to contest the out-of-service charge. The rule went into effect Sept. 27, 2002. But the Feds have been pushing the rules more recently.

The rule requires all states, as a condition of receiving Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program (MCSAP) funds, to place out of service any vehicles discovered operating without registration or proper operating authority. MCSAP funds provide states with money for roadside inspections and safety programs under federal grants.

“It’s about time,” said Rick Craig, director of regulatory affairs, the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers

Association. “Mexican trucks have been illegally operating beyond the border zones for years. The best, and sometimes the only way to catch the violators is at roadside, but most states just look the other way. Finally, the feds are forcing the issue.”

Interstate carriers now submit a Form MCS-150, or a Motor Carrier Identification Report to the FMCSA. For-hire carriers also must apply for appropriate operating authority and file the required forms.



Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-12-29 12:35 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
3yrHitch2Bumper
Reg. Jun 2006
Posted 2007-12-29 7:59 AM (#73468 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Regular


Posts: 98
252525
Location: Midwest USA
Paul...give me your take on how this is going to effect the Medium duty truck owner...if you think it will effect them at all..I am not talking about the guy running hot shots commercially....I'm talking about the horse/rv crowd....Thanks Paul
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dixie
Reg. Jun 2007
Posted 2007-12-29 10:08 AM (#73469 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Veteran


Posts: 142
10025
Location: KY
None, it says for-hire carriers. Pulling your horse trailer with your horses in it does not put you in that category. If you were hauling horses commercially or hauling rv's commercially then it would effect you.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-12-29 11:58 AM (#73471 - in reply to #73468)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont

Originally written by 3yrHitch2Bumper on 2007-12-29 7:59 AM

Paul...give me your take on how this is going to effect the Medium duty truck owner...if you think it will effect them at all..I am not talking about the guy running hot shots commercially....I'm talking about the horse/rv crowd....Thanks Paul

This is why the IOWA thread probably occurred...The state DOT boys are out shopping for rigs that they can identify as commercial, trying to fly under the radar, so to speak...Then they get to send their enforcement NUMBERS off to DC to show they should be getting MORE grant money...

 

Basically, if it looks like a DUCK...it is going to get PULLED OVER...(Mix those metaphors..)



Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-12-29 12:01 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jeepplr
Reg. Oct 2007
Posted 2007-12-29 8:53 PM (#73480 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Veteran


Posts: 233
10010025
Location: Pataskala, Ohio
What makes you look like a "Duck"?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-12-30 11:46 AM (#73495 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
It's not that hard to figure out, if you know what "FOR HIRE" means. Anything that gets $$$ into your pocket!!!!!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
IcePonyGoddess
Reg. Nov 2006
Posted 2007-12-30 3:03 PM (#73499 - in reply to #73495)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Elite Veteran


Posts: 792
500100100252525
Location: East Tennessee, USA, Planet Earth
Originally written by rick on 2007-12-30 11:46 AM

It's not that hard to figure out, if you know what "FOR HIRE" means. Anything that gets $$$ into your pocket!!!!!


Yes...and in WI..that includes any activity that increase the value of your horse. Such as winning a ribbon at the local horse show. Or winning a purse when running cans at the local gaming show.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
robdnorm
Reg. Jan 2005
Posted 2007-12-30 3:21 PM (#73501 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 500
500
Location: West TN
I would figure someone going down the road with a 6h+ trailer being pulled by a FL would be a good target.  Anything that looks out of the ordinary of being a weekend traveler.  I guess that is one of the reasons that campers are not stopped as often. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
3yrHitch2Bumper
Reg. Jun 2006
Posted 2007-12-31 9:01 AM (#73518 - in reply to #73469)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Regular


Posts: 98
252525
Location: Midwest USA

WELL....LET'S SEE.............IF YOU SHOW YOUR HORSE ON THE WEEKEND AND YOU PULL YOUR 4-6 HORSE TRAILER WITH A 1 TON TRUCK AND YOU DO SOMEHOW PROFIT FROM IT BUY WINNING YOUR CLASS AT SAID SHOW......NOW WHAT??

 

THE REASON I BRING THIS UP IS THAT I TRAVEL ALL OVER THE USA SELLING MEDIUM DUTY TRUCKS( 187" M2 FREIGHTLINERS)..AND I TALK TO PEOPLE FROM CALIFORNIA TO MARYLAND AND IT SEEMS THE STATES ARE ALL LOOKING AT THE SMALL GUYS NOT THE BIG GUYS RIGHT NOW...(2500-3500 TRUCKS).....IT STARTS WITH A "OVERLOADED" SITUATION AND PROGRESS'S INTO A "CDL" ISSUE ONCE PULLED OVER......IF YOU HAVE A 2500 AND YOU ARE PULLING 14,000 LBS, THEY GOT YA.....IF YOU HAVE A 6 HORSE TRAILER AND IT IS LOADED AND 5 OF YOUR HORSE'S  AND THE 6TH IS A FRIEND OF YOURS AND YOU CANNOT PROVIDE PAPERWORK, THEN YOU ARE MAKING $$$...(IN THERE EYES)........

THE "NOT FOR HIRE" DAYS ARE COMING TO AN END AS I SEE IT......

ANYMORE THERE IS A "FINE LINE" BETWEEN BEING COMMERCIAL AND NON-COMMERCIAL....SOME SAY IF YOU ARE OVER 150 MILES FROM YOUR FARM THEN YOU MUST BE COMMERCIAL......IF YOU CALL 5 STATES YOU WILL GET 5 DIFFERENT ANSWERS, I KNOW, BECAUSE I HAVE DONE IT......THEY LIKE THE "GRAY" AREA TO ALL OF THIS.....

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
perk2754
Reg. Oct 2007
Posted 2008-01-02 10:24 AM (#73602 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Veteran


Posts: 112
100
Location: Bow, NH
Hmm, HORSES - PROFIT, does anyone else see the oxymoron in there?.... 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
mnhunter
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2008-01-02 11:03 AM (#73604 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 32
25
Location: chatfield mn

There are two differant kind of commercial vehicles, for hire and private carriers.  This ruling was directed towards for hire carriers.  If you are hauling your own property for your own business, you are a private carrier.  The only people this would affect in the horse business is the transport haulers.  This rule was put in place to even the field for carriers that operate in the Mexican border area.  In the past if you encountered a commercial veh that did not meet all the requierments, you could write a ticket but had to allow that vehicle to continue.  This ruling says they can be put out of service (shut down), until they meet the requirements.  I cant see how this would would be a bad thing to most of us.  This has nothing to do with most horse people or horse businesses.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Terri
Reg. Jan 2004
Posted 2008-01-02 2:27 PM (#73628 - in reply to #73604)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...



Expert


Posts: 2828
200050010010010025
Location: Southern New Mexico
When I was looking up the laws on TXDOT there was a clause about live loads being allowed to continue to their destination as long as the vehicle wasn't falling apart.  I don't remember the exact words.  But it said it would be better to allow the animals to get to their destination than to have them on the side of the road where they could die or escape.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
10Ha.Wood
Reg. Jun 2006
Posted 2008-01-03 8:59 AM (#73680 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 46
25
Location: Ottawa, ON
This is curious. Here in Ontario the commercial rules were relaxed to exempt personal use on heavier pickup trucks. Up until this year all pickups with registered weights over 9900lbs had to follow all comercial regs. We are now exempt from the annual medical, daily safety inspections (circle check) and driver logs. We still have to register the truck for the additional weight of the trailer, but we can put the 'personal use' sticker back on the plate.The exemption is specific to unmodified pickup trucks, and they have clear rules about what horse related activities are 'personal'.I was under the impression that DOT type laws were standardized across North America so I was very surprised when I found out about these changes.Details, if you are curious, can be seen here:http://www.landscapeontario.com/attach/1191346377.Personal_Use_Pickup_Exemption_Sept_21_07.docChris
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
mnhunter
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2008-01-03 10:51 AM (#73687 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 32
25
Location: chatfield mn

The federal regulations apply to those commercial vehicles that are engaged in interstate commerce ( crossing state lines for business purpose).  Each state has the option of adopting most, all, or none of the regulations for commercial vehicles that are involved in intrastate (staying within their home state) commerce.  Here in Mn, they have adopted about 99 percent of the federal regulations for intrastate vehicles.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
NATDA
Reg. May 2007
Posted 2008-01-03 10:51 AM (#73688 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 25
25
Location: Florida

The following is an article that was published on our website. This is becoming more frequent, and is starting to pose a problem for the entire trailer towing community.

DOT Numbering Requirements The Not So NEW DOT Regulations That Impact Car, Boat, and Horse Enthusiasts By Mary Cedeno The Regulations are NOT new. They seem new because we simply went on our merry way before and never thought about them. But when our friends started getting pulled over and cited and told to get US Dept. of Transportation (USDOT) numbers, they kind of got our attention. However, simply obtaining a DOT number is not where the difficulty lies. It is what comes AFTER that. Any commercial vehicle operating in interstate commerce, who obtains a USDOT number, is required to abide by the FMCSA Safety Regulations. This includes keeping a daily log book, certain safety training, vehicle inspections, annual log reviews, etc and so on…obviously meant for COMMERCIAL transporters. There are strict requirements for these log books, it’s not simply writing down your mileage from one place to the next. If you are interested in learning more about these regulations, you can stop at any truck stop and purchase the 661 page “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Pocketbook” for about $5. Oh, but don’t forget to grab the $2 (or so) “Official Deluxe Duplicate Copy DRIVER’S DAILY LOG” – because you’ll need that too if you get your USDOT number and intend to travel across state lines (even with your hobby race or show car). Hobbyists, trailering their car, horse or boat to an event, are being stopped on the roads by enforcement officers all across the country and told they need a DOT number. The hobbyists are simply taking their hobby vehicle to a show or race event. They are on the road perhaps five or six times a year with their vehicles, in summer weather usually, and often towing some of their most valued possessions. To hold hobbyists to the same commercial standards as commercial transporters simply does not make sense. And the lawmakers obviously agreed - which is why they specifically wrote certain applicability requirements into the exceptions of the regulation. Specifically, 390.3(f) Exceptions. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules in this subchapter do not apply to - (f)(3) The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise; Even with the Guidance below, supplied by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, hobbyists are being stopped and cited by enforcement officers. Question 21: Does the exemption in §390.3(f)(3) for the “occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise” apply to persons who occasionally use CMVs to transport cars, boats, horses, etc., to races, tournaments, shows or similar events, even if prize money is offered at these events? Guidance: The exemption would apply to this kind of transportation, provided: (1) The underlying activities are not undertaken for profit, i.e., (a) prize money is declared as ordinary income for tax purposes, and (b) the cost of the underlying activities is not deducted as a business expense for tax purposes; and, where relevant; (2) corporate sponsorship is not involved. Drivers must confer with their State of licensure to determine the licensing provisions to which they are subject. SO, WHY ARE HOBBYISTS BEING TARGETED? I asked a question of two different Federal Officers …What if a person is a member of a car club and the club obtains money from sponsors, the car is required to run the decals of the sponsors. The prize money for anyone who wins is made up partly of the money the club obtained from sponsors and partly from membership dues. Now, is that considered corporate sponsorship? BOTH of the agents I spoke with told me no, that would be prize money and the exception would still apply if they claimed it as regular income and did not write off expenses as part of a business. The difference is Corporate Sponsorship is what is paid to an individual whether they win a race or not, endorsement money is based on a driver winning and is therefore PRIZE money. Part of the problem appears to be how the officer stopping you interprets what he/she is seeing. And, how do you, as the one being ticketed and potentially impounded, prove to the officer that you are simply a HOBBY racer and not in business or under a corporate sponsorship? Even the people answering the phones at the FMCSA Help Line do not know about this exception and insisted anything over 10,000 lbs combined must have a DOT number. I spoke with supervisor after supervisor, until they finally referred me to the FMCSA Enforcement Office in Washington. STUCK IN THE MIDDLE According to the IRS, a business venture needs to have profit as its primary motive and the individuals involved need to spend a substantial amount of time participating in the venture. In order to write off business expenses the business needs to be profitable within three years and have a profit two out of five years with very few exceptions to this rule. Just because you may have a lot of money invested into it, unless it is specifically performed for PROFIT and your “business” turns a profit in at least two of five years (generally speaking), then you have yourself a hobby, not a business. So here we are, the hobby racer, seemingly stuck in the middle of two opposing federal rules. But not so, the IRS clearly defines the rules of business, and with the GUIDANCE in question 21 above, the FMCSA has clearly defined “commercial”. But unless the enforcement officer agrees, you will still be ticketed. CONSEQUENCES OF USDOT NUMBERING Some of you are wondering, “Wouldn’t it be easier to just get the DOT number and be done with it?” Well, if you are operating a commercial motor vehicle over 10,000lbs for business purposes, you have no choice, you must get the DOT number. However, if you are a hobbyist abiding by all the restrictions of the exception noted above, and you still want to get the DOT number and cross state lines, you WILL be subject to the DOT safety regulations just as they apply to the commercial truckers. If you are driving a 26,000 lb or more CMV, you are most likely required to obtain a CDL (commercial drivers’ license). This will kick in even more restrictions, including annual drug and alcohol screening. However, if you are operating an RV - these CDL rules may not apply. APPLICABLE OR NOT, HERE THEY COME Well, here it is. The Federal government has given us an exception to the applicability of the DOT numbering requirements; they gave their guidance describing who exactly gets the exception. Both are available for review online by anyone who would like to look at them. And then we have the enforcement agent. It seems that some of the DOT enforcement officers are unaware of the exception and may have never seen the interpretation in the FMCSA guidance documents. They may be having difficulty determining who IS a business and who is not. So, they appear to be requiring EVERYONE to get a DOT number….even though the regulation stipulates hobbyists as described above, don’t need one. It’s the equivalent to hauling in all the redheads on the block because someone saw a redhead committing a crime. If the police did this, they would be in the wrong and there would be many, many people pointing it out. So where is all the fuss? Why isn’t anyone saying anything? I think folks are intimidated and afraid to speak out. After all, the enforcement officer wields a lot of power over the average driver and they CAN make your life difficult - if only for a short time. In the end, hobbyists are subject NOT to the actual regulations, but to the INTERPRETATION by the officer who stops us on any given day, in any given state. Just because we may be right does not mean we won’t get stopped by an officer somewhere who sees the rules/regulations differently. WHAT CAN YOU DO? If you ARE just a hobbyist and do not write off your expenses, and you want to take the exception, I suggest you not only carry a copy of the regulation and exception, but read it and understand it so that you can CALMLY explain it to the officer who may stop you. Because it sounds to me like the officers on the road are going to test your knowledge. If you ARE cited, be sure take the opportunity to go to court to explain the situation and defend yourself. Because if you ARE just a hobbyist, the exemption in the regulations is written for YOU. If you do go to court, you might want to bring your tax records with you as proof. Although all the States have adopted the federal regulation, be aware that individual States may have additional regulations written in to their traffic laws. It is your responsibility to contact the state where you plan to tow your vehicle and check on the regulations that apply. That is easier said than done of course. I personally was transferred over seven times on the phone when trying to find a DOT officer in one state who could tell me if they had any additional regulations that may apply. I ended up back at the first one who transferred me! Don’t be shy. Contact your local track owners, state representatives and anyone else who will listen. There is an exception - if it does not apply to hobbyists - then who does it apply to? RV’s AND THE USDOT NUMBERING REQUIREMENTS OK, here’s the rub guys. You can get yourself a nice big toter home and tow your 50’ recreational stacker trailer anywhere you want and you won’t need to worry about those silly little DOT numbers. You can tow it all day long – cover 80ft of road and no worry. No USDOT requirements for RV’s used solely for recreational purposes, if you use them for business that’s something else and the regulations would apply. CDL LICENSING If your gross vehicle weight (GVW) or gross vehicle combined weight (GVCW) are over 26,000 lbs you are most likely required to obtain a Commercial Drivers License (CDL). You might be able to get away with an RV Endorsement if you have an RV, but it varies from State to State and it might be easier just to get the CDL. However, the CDL licensing may kick additional regulations into play. Please contact your DMV office and ask the questions before you decide to get the CDL. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FMCSA = Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration The specific regulation is 49 CFR 390.3 The FMCSA web site where the regulation and Guidance document are located are at: www.fmcsa.dot.gov/rules-regulations/administration/fmcsr/390reg.htm I have been told by a FMCSA rep that ALL states have adopted this federal regulation.



Edited by NATDA 2008-01-03 10:53 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
mnhunter
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2008-01-03 9:20 PM (#73721 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 32
25
Location: chatfield mn

I would agree that the regulations are complicated and can be hard to understand to see if they apply to different situations.  One of the most important things if you talk to a DOT person about what you need is to explain just what your situation is and what you are going to be doing.  I will give you an example of a stop I made a while back to try to explain just how complicated things can get.  I stopped a dually pulling a gooseneck trailer for a speeding violation and during the stop asked the driver several question to determine if she qualified as a commercial vehicle.  She was coming back from taking her horse to Kentucky for some surgery.  She was raising him to be a racehorse.  She said she intended to decuct the cost of the trip as a business expense on her taxes.  She had farm plates on the truck.  the total gvwr of the combination was over 26000 lbs.  MN says you can drive any size vehicle up to 150 miles on farm plates with a regular drivers license.  She was clearly over this range.  Because it was for business, she needed a DOT number for her business.  In MN she can drive a farm truck without a medical card, (a state exemption to the Fed laws). As she crossed state lines she needs one.  She also needs her business name and dot number displayed on the vehicle.  Needs anual inspection on the truck and the trailer.  Needed to have a log book as she was more than 100 miles from home.  Needed a fire extinguisher and warning devices in the vehicle.  In this case, I did not write any tickets because I belileved she was not aware of any of the above.  In the end, we have to make the decision weather the person is really unaware or is just lying and trying to get by. How many people think it would work to tell the IRS they didnt know they needed to do all that stuff when it came to complying with the tax code.

 

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Terri
Reg. Jan 2004
Posted 2008-01-03 11:47 PM (#73732 - in reply to #73721)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...



Expert


Posts: 2828
200050010010010025
Location: Southern New Mexico
Sometimes I think the tax code is easier to understand. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
brushycreekranch
Reg. Jun 2006
Posted 2008-01-04 5:39 AM (#73735 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...





500100100100100
Location: Central Arkansas
So, if she had been pulling a fully self contained LQ trailer with a M2 Sportchassis with not for "hire on the side" that was carrying her trail riding mule.......would you have even have thought about ticketing her?

If the truck has a comercial weight tag and the trailer has a semi tag, would that raise a red flag to you also? Even tough there is no commerical advertising on the rig?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
mnhunter
Reg. Apr 2006
Posted 2008-01-04 1:24 PM (#73760 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 32
25
Location: chatfield mn
It would all depend on answers to some questions I would ask her.  Is that trip part of or infurtherance of a business.  Are the expenses of that trip being used as a business deduction.  The problem is that I have to decide on the side of the road weather the driver is being truthful or not without actually seeing their tax records.  The problem with talking about differant types of registration in different states is that the federal regs dont care what type of registration you have on your truck, just what it is being used for.  There are no federal regulations in regards to registration. You can have RV plates on your vehicle and still be a commercial veh because of what it is being used for on that date. Lets say you have an antique business and are going state to state to sell things at antique shows.  You are hauling your antiques in a trailer you are pulling with your motorhome.  You do this several months a year and treat it as a business. Although you have RV plates on your motorhome, it still meets the definition of a commercial vehicle because your combined gwwr is over 10,000 lbs. You would need to comply with all the federal dot laws.   
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
walnuthill
Reg. Jan 2008
Posted 2008-01-07 8:46 AM (#73913 - in reply to #73721)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 9

Location: Greentown, IN

We are in Indiana - just had our annual safety audit for DOT.  It is my understanding that you have to have a DOT number (and comply with the regulations) if you are going to show or breed horses and you will need a CDL IF your rig is a certain size (GVWR +26000).  We show our horses and breed one foal per year.  Our rig is a 3H LQ with Midtack.  The LQ is 18' on the long wall.  The DOT inspector we had was very nice, knowledgable and also warned us about going into Ohio (apparently OH says the truck has to be tagged at the combined weight of the truck/trailer).  She stated that in the state of Indiana they will be checking horse trailer rigs more often and that many are operating illegally.  She asked us to spread the word to our show friends that any rig used for 'show' should have a DOT number and they would fine them.  Our truck has an 11,000 plate, our trailer an 11,000 plate (so I assumed we were covered going anywhere - with the combined plate weights).  We are legal in Indiana (home state) but not for Ohio.  Sorry but we use to go to OH for shows - not anymore with what we heard.  She said that IL, MI and KY were reciprocal for us - not to worry that we wouldn't have any problems.  The only glitch (recommendation) that she made was that I should get my CDL as my hubby normally drives and if something were to happen to him out on the road - I wouldn't be able to legally drive the rig home.  He has a CDL as he worked p/t as a truck driver.  The other snafoo is that since we do have a DOT number if I were to get a bumper pull trailer (and pull it with my F-150), I would need to add it and the truck to our 'equipment'.  The whole DOT process was a struggle to go thru (it truly does apply to commerical traffic and it was so hard to wrap ourselves around the terminology since we don't consider ourselves commercial) but the DOT personnel were helpful and very cooperative.  They do understand that we are hauling livestock and not a commerical load per se but still we must comply.  The other 'bonus' so to speak is that if we are audited by the IRS - we now have all our truck/trailer logs and reciepts together.  Edited to add: she also stated Pennsylvania was another 'difficult' state.



Edited by walnuthill 2008-01-07 8:52 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
headhunter
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2008-01-07 10:07 AM (#73921 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...



Elite Veteran


Posts: 736
50010010025
Location: Western WA

When we had the CDL/DOT registration discussion a few months back, I emailed WA state DOT and WA state dept of licensing with an overview of my situation and a description of my rig.  I show NRHA where I do win prize money, as a non-pro, and pull a LQ horse trailer with a one ton dually.  I am under 26k lbs loaded.   Both agencies replied back that I do not need a CDL and do not need DOT numbers.  I printed out the emails and keep them in my truck, and plan to show them if I am ever stopped and questioned about either issue. 

I don't consider either to get me out of any situation, but I did make a good faith inquiry to the licensing authorities in my home state and I would think that would count for something.

Although, I am contemplating getting a CDL just to have it, but wonder if having it but not complying with the log book and DOT number requirements would get me into more trouble than not having it at all. 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
walnuthill
Reg. Jan 2008
Posted 2008-01-07 12:21 PM (#73931 - in reply to #73921)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 9

Location: Greentown, IN
My trailer EMPTY weighs 18,500. Once you add the horses weight and trailer - Loaded, we are at 22000.  But she was adamant that if you SHOW (we show NRHA and American Ranch Horse as well as AQHA) you need a DOT number.  What I didn't realize is how to comply with the DOT regulations (come on - we show our own horses; we are not a trainer and not a transport company) but we are suppose to do the drug testing, have a drug/alcohol policy (husband doesn't drink and is the only driver), log book, etc.  It makes for a paperwork nightmare for something that is suppose to be 'pleasurable' - she said if we had 'pleasure horses' it would be different.  I said they were pleasure horses, that showing was a hobby and she said it didn't matter.  If we 'showed' them, we needed a DOT number.  Again - we live in Indiana and that could be the reason.  Hubby asked if we sold our LQ and just bought a truck and bumper pull (go for day shows) would we still need one and she said yes.  So again, I'm confused and a little peeved (it costs money - the state charges us $39 a year to have it on Indiana roads and if I purchase a bumper pull and pull it with my F-150, it goes up to $116 a year (4 units).  Okay - what part of this is pleasure? All I'm concerned about is being 'legal'.  Bottom line is that we own a boarding business and since we own a horse/agriculture business we need the DOT number (I understand anyway).  Even though we have never hauled one of our client's horses in our trailer - we might need to one day and then it would truly be 'commercial'.  BTW - this trailer was not expensed against the business until we got the DOT number.  All I know is that we were told they are really going to hit Indiana hard and start pulling over truck/horse trailer combinations.  As for your situation - If you have inquired regarding your state and were told you didn't need it - what more can you do?

Edited by walnuthill 2008-01-07 12:33 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
horsey1
Reg. Dec 2004
Posted 2008-01-07 12:27 PM (#73932 - in reply to #73921)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Elite Veteran


Posts: 720
500100100
To Headhunter- Where you might want to be careful, is not that you are under 26,000 loaded, but if you add the GVWR of your truck & trailer together what is it? That's what gets a lot of us. We actually load low enough, but are rated high enough to be over the magic number.... If you are 26,001 or higher, it will be a lot harder to explain out of the CDL argument.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
walnuthill
Reg. Jan 2008
Posted 2008-01-07 12:37 PM (#73933 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Member


Posts: 9

Location: Greentown, IN

Yeah that's what gets us every time with our rig.  Another thing we didn't do and that I understand we should have been doing (another compliancing thing) is to go to the weigh stations - I thought those were for semi's - nope, we were told every trip we take if it goes by a weigh station we have to stop and have our rig weighed.  This has been the most educating experience I have gone thru in a long time.  Hopefully everyone will get the correct answers and be compliant regarding this.  It sure has been an eye opener.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Spooler
Reg. Aug 2006
Posted 2008-01-07 3:37 PM (#73944 - in reply to #73467)
Subject: RE: WHY the State DOTs are acting against apparent commercial rigs...


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 544
50025
Location: Claxton, Ga.
My truck and trailer GVWR is right at 25,000 and some change. I am very close to being on the oh no side of the fence requiring a CDL.  FRom what I have read and asked I should be fine for what I am doing.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
Message format
 

'
Registered to: Horse Trailer World
(Delete all cookies set by this site)