'
1
Forums Albums Skins 1
Search Register Logon


You are logged in as a guest. Logon or register an account to access more features.
OTHER FORUMS:    Barrel Horses  -   Trucks   -   Cutting  -   Reining  -   Roping 
'
'09 F150 vs F250

Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Last activity 2011-06-17 9:42 AM
25 replies, 10049 views

View previous thread :: View next thread
   General Discussion -> Trailer Talk  Click to return to Barrel Talk
Refresh
Message format
 
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-30 4:10 PM (#132379)
Subject: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA

We currently own a '09 F150, 4 dr 5.4L, 4x4.  I would like to get an Aluminum Gooseneck, at most we pull 2 horses and 2 ponies.  Looking at a 4 horse slant. I know everyone is against pulling a 4 horse with a half ton so my question is what am I going to get out of a 250 that the 150 wouldn't have?  We have been told we can put air bags on the rear end and willing to do that.  We can also install the brake controller.  Im not looking for negative comments on the 150, we are willing to look at a bigger truck, but I need to know what the difference is.  Also, we live in Iowa, only pull a couple times a month, mainly local fun shows/trail rides within a couple hours.  This truck is also a daily driver.

Thanks!

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-30 5:10 PM (#132381 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
The F250 will yield more powerful engine options, stronger frame, bigger brakes, higher load rated tires, of course stronger suspension and axles. The footprint of a 250 is larger than the 150 so it will be more stable while towing, not to mention its going to weigh 8000lbs vs about 6500 lbs. There is no way I'd pull a 4 horse loaded with an F150. I know how a 1/2 ton acts with a 2 horse bumper pull. Underpowered and under braked.250's/2500 series trucks are just all around better tow vehicles. Just as a note, I wouldn't purchase the 250 with the 5.4l. Poor fuel mileage and underpowered for the truck, especially towing a loaded 4 horse trailer.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-31 9:46 AM (#132425 - in reply to #132381)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
Ok, now can you tell me gas vs diesel? Pros/cons? And what about just going with a 350? Our options are open. May keep the 150 as a daily driver and get something a little older. Thanks for your help!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 10:06 AM (#132429 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio

Diesel would be my choice, but I'm partial, especially if you go older. Sticking with the "Ford" theme, the 7.3 turbo diesel is a great engine. The 6.0 has a bad rep, but I love mine. Diesel trucks will have higher torque which is better of course for towing. They will yield better fuel mileage than a similarly equipped gas truck. They are also more expensive to maintain and at the present fuel cost, more expensive fill at the pump. Diesels will also have a higher initial purchase price than a similarly equipped gas truck.

Again, sticking with "Ford," the 6.8L V10 is a very good option. My dad has a 2001 F350 dually with the V10 and 4.30 gears and loves it. He pulls similar weights that I do with my diesel and has zero issues and does it very well. He gets about 12mpg on average. It is much cheaper to maintain and again, at the current fuel prices, cheaper to fill at the pump. The V10's will also be cheaper at the initial purchase.

Here's a cost analysis post that I used a while back:

http://www.horsetrailerworld.com/forum/thread-view.asp?threadid=14851&start=1

Diesels are going to be anywhere from $3,000 to $7,000 more to purchase than any gas truck right off the bat. For my diesel, Ford 6.0, it takes 15 quarts of Motorcraft 15w-40 diesel engine oil that is $14.00 per 5 quarts which is $42.00 total and a Motorcraft Oil Filter that is $18.77 at the local Wal-Mart. We'll call this $60 even for each oil change done every 5 thousand miles--labor done by yours truly. Now $60 times 20 Oil changes (per 100,000 miles) is $1200. If you factor in Fuel filter changes done at the recommended 10,000 mi mark at ~$50 per change (Motorcraft fuel filters) is another $500 per 100,000 miles. Diesels use 2 batteries instead of 1 (+$85) and will need changed before 100k.

So initially, we are going to look at middle of the road $5000 off the top for diesel engine option. We're at $6785 in VERY basic maintenance cost plus the initial cost for the diesel option.

For the sake of conversation, transmission fluid change, transfer case fluid change, differential fluid changes, tires, and basic 100k maintenance(belts, t-stat, water pump, etc) I will leave out because are necessary on both trucks and will both equal about the same - We'll call it $3000 total for 100k.

V10's--use 6 quarts of Motocraft Syn blend 5w-20 oil at $3.99 a quart and a Motorcraft oil filter that is a mere $3.69. Change every 5k makes for a $30 oil change labor done by yours truly. Half the cost of a change for a diesel. $600 per 100,000 miles. Spark plugs--Motorcraft Iridium Plugs are $3.49 each times 10 is ~$35.00 every 50k (even though they are 100k plugs). So, $70 total and lets call it $80 for the change of plug wires at 100k. On gas engines I've owned, I don't worry about fuel filter changes until about 100k or I start noticing problems because they are such a hassle. $750 per 100,000 in VERY basic maintenance costs.

Both diesel and gas barring additonal "warranty claim" troubles and cost (glow plugs, injectors, ball joints, u-joints, etc).

Fuel costs-Current price at the pump- $2.95 for 87, 3.25 for diesel. For sake of conversation, both trucks have BONE DRY on E 38 gal tanks. Gas = $112.10 to fill excluding tax, Diesel = $123.50 to fill excluding tax. $11.40 more to fill up. Lets say I get 550 miles from my diesel per tank and the V10 gets 450 miles per tank (realistic #'s from experience). Per 100,000 miles--drum roll please-- Diesel--182 fill ups at $123.50 per fill (assuming static fuel price) = $22,477 per 100k in fuel cost -- V10 -- 222 fill ups at $112.10 per fill (assuming static fuel price) = 24,886.20 per 100k in fuel cost.

-Diesel $22,477 + $6785 (initial cost and maintenance) equals $29,262 per 100k.

-V10 $24,886.20 + $750 (Maintenance) equals $25,616.20 per 100k.

29,262 - 25,616.20

EQUALS

$3645.80 in additional diesel cost in 100,000 miles.

Is it worth it? Absolutely 100%. I'll never own another truck that isn't diesel powered. The towing power is worth it. 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-31 11:27 AM (#132430 - in reply to #132429)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
Wow, I feel like I owe you for writing all that up! Thanks a bunch! We are looking into an older f250 diesel, 2000 yr range. If I think of anything else I know who to ask!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 12:34 PM (#132432 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio

I just copied it from a post I had written a couple months ago. No problem at all.

In the 2000 year range, the Ford 7.3L turbo diesel or the 6.8L V10 would be your best choices in my opinion, but be careful of anything you buy. Ford has an "Oasis Report" that can be ran at any dealer (or over the phone) that spells out any warrantly work that was performed on the truck--so at least you know what you're getting--good or bad. If you end up going for a V10, the 99-early 01's had issues with blowing out spark plugs. Many were fixed under warranty or afterward. They still offer a fix kit for this problem that is fairly easy to do yourself. My dad has a late 01 V10 and it has had 95,000 trouble free miles. The 7.3 diesel in the Super Duty ran 99-early 2003. In late 2003 they switched to the 6.0 diesel. I love my 2006 6.0 diesel, but the earlier ones (2003-2004) is what got them the bad reputation, although many have reported early 6.0's to be great trucks.

Next choice would be Dodge with the 5.9L cummins diesel, but I'm personally not a fan of Dodges from that time. They were a smaller truck than the Ford Superduty and the transmissions had a bad reputation. The 5.9L gas V8 is a good engine, but I think you would find it underpowered, and the 8L v10 they offered leaned to being more problematic than it was worth and theres not many around so parts are a little more scarce.

I wouldn't consider a Chevrolet until about 2003 or 2004 model years. The 6.0L gas V8 is a good engine, but again, I think you'll find it underpowered and a gas hog, the 8.1L V8, again, good engine but a gas hog-very powerful, and the duramax 6.6L turbo diesel which has a good reputation. The Allison trans offered with the 8.1L and Duramax is probably one of the best available, IMHO. If you go older, I would get a late 90's with a 454 V8, but thats MY preferences. Stay away from the 6.5 diesel they offered.

 

I have a truck sickness..

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
gonzo1066
Reg. Oct 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 3:33 PM (#132441 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Veteran


Posts: 264
1001002525
Location: Sumas Washington
I agree with the previous posts,  One exception being the GM 8100 engine.   I do not know the company repair history of the fleet. but the owners that I know were not happy with the 8100 AT ALL.   Camshaft and lifter issues were what we saw, besides being EXTREAMLY gas thirsty.    The 99-2002 Dodge diesel trucks had issues with the electric lift pump and automatic transmissions if towed heavy.  The 6 speed manual transmission however is nearly bombproof.   The 03-7 Dodge diesel; is a much better choice, more dependable.   Those later than 07.5 are the 6.7 Cummins.   A VERY reliable engine to say the least, but the fuel mileage is not quite as good as the earlier 5.9 engine.     I would be hard pressed to recommend a 6.0 or 6.4 Powerstroke Ford.  If towed hard some of them have had very expensive repair bills.   I am the first to say that not all of them are bad.  But being a diesel mechanic by trade there are some glaring design flaws that connot be overlooked.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Ike
Reg. Jun 2005
Posted 2011-03-31 4:19 PM (#132444 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250



Veteran


Posts: 274
1001002525
Location: Memphis, TN

Good info here from both Grnm and Gonzo.

I had a F250 with the 5.4 gas. Not e'nuff power. Got an 05 F250 6.0 now. Love it.

Your looking at a 2000 7.3 thats 11 years old.  How many miles?  Good motor but thats 11 yrs worth gone by.

Stick with the diesel in a 2500 size truck for towing.  If diesel keeps going up my daily driver will be a bicycle. I am only 7 miles to work.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-31 4:56 PM (#132448 - in reply to #132444)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
I really appreciate everyone's help! We bought our 150 new and its my husbands daily driver, we would be upside down to trade it in. We really won't use the 250 that often. We are just starting to look, in the end we may end up selling the half ton, who knows at this point! And he is a Ford guy, wont convince him on anything else!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-31 4:56 PM (#132449 - in reply to #132444)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
I really appreciate everyone's help! We bought our 150 new and its my husbands daily driver, we would be upside down to trade it in. We really won't use the 250 that often. We are just starting to look, in the end we may end up selling the half ton, who knows at this point! And he is a Ford guy, wont convince him on anything else!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2011-03-31 7:03 PM (#132458 - in reply to #132449)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont
Originally written by dgolden on 2011-03-31 4:56 PM

I really appreciate everyone's help! We bought our 150 new and its my husbands daily driver, we would be upside down to trade it in. We really won't use the 250 that often. We are just starting to look, in the end we may end up selling the half ton, who knows at this point! And he is a Ford guy, wont convince him on anything else!
For a once-in-a-while bumper pull vehicle...you can get a 1 ton van relatively cheap and they pull quite well and you have INSIDE STORAGE...
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 9:17 PM (#132462 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
Don't be afraid of the 2000 model truck. If its in good shape, well taken care of with reasonable mileage...and priced right, it will be a great choice for a tow vehicle.That's interesting info on the 8100. The reading I've done on them seem to be positive.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-03-31 9:48 PM (#132463 - in reply to #132462)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
As I said earlier, we have not completely made up our mind, we are looking into selling the 09 150 and getting a newer 250 now. So any input, say 05 and newer? And we are going diesel. Thanks!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 10:25 PM (#132468 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
Well, you'll get a lot of mixed reviews on 05 and newer Ford Diesels. In 2005, Ford changed a lot of things on the Super Duty's. They look generally the same, but changed the front grill, bumper and headlights as well as updated the interior a little bit. The big changes that were made were a little less visible. The front suspension was changed from leaf springs to coils which make for a better ride, but still maintain the weight carrying capacity. The brakes all around increased in size which required the wheel sizes to increase from a minimum of 16" to a minimum of 17 inches. Also, the integrated trailer brake controller was offered, and it's a pretty cool little feature. The GVWR's went up for 2005 compared to previous years. Now for the controversy. The 6.0L turbo diesel engine. It is generally accepted that the 06 and 07 model years were the best for this engine. Many 05's had turbo problems, 03-04 I think a lot of mistakes were made by Ford and lack of training for their techs that gave them a bad rap. However, there are many unhappy (previous and current) Ford owners because of the alleged unreliability with this engine. The main reported problems include EGR cooler failure, which causes the oil cooler to gum up, and ultimately the heads to lift and head gaskets to fail. Some have reported injector failures, but honestly, thats a bad problem in both Duramax and Cummins engines as well. I personally love my 2006 and have had no problems with it. Either you get a good one or a bad one. It is imperative to have an Oasis report ran on these trucks because that will tell you if it has had a lot of problems or virtually none at all. It took me a long time to find a good one. You can still find some 2007's that have some of the diesel engine warranty (5yr/100k) left just as a cushion. I will add this. I have taken some steps to ensure the reliability of my truck. I deleted the EGR cooler and turned the EGR valve off via a performance tuner. I have added a coolant filtration system, and as we speak, my truck is in having ARP headstuds installed to make sure I don't have the head gasket problems after I'm out of warranty. My buddy is a Ford Diesel mechanic and he is the one that performs all of the work on my truck besides general maintenance. He has also rebuilt my turbo for reliability's sake. I absolutely do not hesitate to recommend a good 6.0 truck. It's a great engine and not given the chance it deserved. IMHO The transmissions in these trucks are darn near bulletproof.Do not skimp on maintenance with any diesel. 5k oil changes, 10k fuel filter changes like clockwork. I don't have much experience with the 6.4 other than most are disappointed in the fuel mileage. I do know that the way the regen system for the DPF is designed is just about the dumbest way I've seen and is notorious for causing turbo failure. I don't personally know anyone that owns one. Maybe some others that own them or have experience with them can chime in.I could go on for pages about the 6.0. Remember, any truck in the "big 3" will have its own unique set of issues. If you have questions, feel free to ask.Good luck!

Edited by GRNMCHNEDAZE 2011-03-31 10:28 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-03-31 10:29 PM (#132469 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
ugh, site won't make paragraphs now?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-04-01 6:59 AM (#132482 - in reply to #132469)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
If I get out to Ohio I owe you a few beers! You are a huge help and I really appreciate you explaining everything in 'English'
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-04-01 7:04 AM (#132483 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
Like I said, it's a sickness. I am glad I can be of some help.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Painted Horse
Reg. May 2005
Posted 2011-04-02 10:25 AM (#132532 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250



Expert


Posts: 2453
20001001001001002525
Location: Northern Utah

Grim,  My sister had a 2008 6.4L and they towed a very large boat with it.  Their truck performed great for them.  Had more power than my 2006 6.0L.   2008 got the make over of the interior. So you were able to get the newer features, Ipod plug in for radio that kind of stuff.  And you are right the 6.4L will get worse fuel mileage the 6.0L from earlier years.

I had both a 2003 and a 2006 6.0L.   Other than odds and end mostly under warranty. They were both good engines.  My 2006 had a bunch of problems right about 100,000 miles and Ford fixed them under warranty, But if I had not seen the problems till after the 100,000 mile warranty expired,  It was about $2000 in repairs.  FCIM, HPOP kind of stuff.

With the stuff that Grim has done to his truck, It should be solid performer for many many miles to come.  My advice if somebody was buying that model year ford. Is just buy the truck right and put some money in saving against the day you need to do those repairs if you ever have to.

The 2011 Fords have been out almost a year now. You are starting to see a few float through used truck sales.  Both my sister and i bought 2011 last summer. With 14,000 miles on mine, I can honestly say, This is the best Ford Truck yet.

 

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
tr0y
Reg. Mar 2009
Posted 2011-04-02 6:32 PM (#132550 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Veteran


Posts: 114
100
Location: Home of the WNFR at Christmas
Hi Golden -

I am going to make everybody mad but I say, don't waste your money, ball park on towing for your Ford is between 10,500 and 11,300 dependent on model. So look around at trailers and you can find a 4 horse gooseneck that will weigh in between 5000 and 6000 pounds, while everyone "thinks" their QH is a 1350 pound brute go actually put your horses on a scale and get a true weight, weight tapes don't count !

Now get out your calculator and do some math, 6000 for the trailer 2500 for two horses 1500 for two ponies = 10,000 pounds more than likely within your tow ratings, for both insurance, saftey and what will not break your truck.

Add airbags, they are great they are in all of our trucks and go in the day we buy a truck.

Next you run in the midwest and not that much in the way of any real elevation change,I have lived in MN so I think I can say that, if your concerned about stopping, do a real brake upgrade on the f150 add some big calipers, sticky brake pads, braided steel lines and slotted and cross drilled rotors.

My wife runs a Dodge 1500 and pulls the small gooseneck, about what your looking at legally and it does just fine.

My best advice do your homework, use hard numbers, real facts, math is your friend save a stack of cash and ride your horse more.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-04-02 6:47 PM (#132551 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
But the pin weight will overload it. frame, axles, and on. Airbags aren't the cure-all for overloading. Just because you can...doesn't mean you should.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
tr0y
Reg. Mar 2009
Posted 2011-04-02 6:59 PM (#132552 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Veteran


Posts: 114
100
Location: Home of the WNFR at Christmas
Most 1/2 tons have a considerably higher payload then a true 1/2 ton i.e. 1000 pounds. Dependant upon what configuration Golden has the payload can run from approx 1780 to well over 3000 pounds in an f150 per the Ford spec. I would also suspect that 100% of the time they will not run at full load, we almost never do. You can move the pin numbers with different stock loading configurations as well. Once again read your specs, do the math.

Math will set you free, and engineers want to tell me math lies ?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
GRNMCHNEDAZE
Reg. Mar 2010
Posted 2011-04-02 7:30 PM (#132553 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 342
10010010025
Location: Ohio
3000 lbs in a 150? no thanks. The 2010 F150 Crew Cab short bed 4x4 Max Tow has a RAWR of 4800lbs, same truck has a 7200lb gvwr, curb weight of ~5700 lbs (this is before you include driver, passenger, kid(s), dog, tools, etc). Let's call that 500 lbs on the light side. So now you're at 6200 lbs loaded curb weight. That leaves 1000 lbs for payload according to the GVWR. These trucks have a rear curb weight of ~2500-2700 lbs. That's 2100-2300 lbs MAX payload on the rear axle before you start getting in trouble with DOT. Generally, most of us figure pin weight for 20-25% of the trailer's gvwr. In a trailer that weighs 6k empty, designed to haul 4 full size horses, will most likely have 7k lb axles. So, thats 3000-3500 lbs of potential pin weight. Realistically, with the load mentioned and the 10k loaded weight estimate that was mentioned, it will be closer to the 2500 lb mark. The truck is overloaded in all aspects. I'm not going to recommend a truck that's going to be under-powered, under-braked, and running at max or over the limits of what it was designed to do. What you do is your prerogative.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dgolden
Reg. Aug 2009
Posted 2011-04-02 9:17 PM (#132558 - in reply to #132553)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 11

Location: Stockton IA
Just for conversation, we have the 09 f150 xlt 5.4 I think we may get a little better gas mileage with a 3/4 ton diesel, I would rather be safe than sorry. I know diesel fuel costs more. We really don't haul that often but I would like a little nicer trailer for when we do. And if we ruin our truck by pulling too much then we are in worse shape. I really appreciate everyone's comments!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
geraldbaker
Reg. Jun 2011
Posted 2011-06-15 9:34 PM (#134886 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Member


Posts: 12

Here are what I saw in the internet regarding the differences of the two trucks:F-250 is considered as one of the Super duty trucks that have heavy-duty body-on-frame steel ladder parts like axel, brakes, springs and transmission. Resulting to a much higher towing capabilities.F-150 is the best-selling vehicle in United States for over 24 years. As of today, Ford changed some of the parts of this truck inline with the today's technology. F-150 have Ford F150 parts like leather seating surfaces, has a requisite exhaust tones and powers to the top of 115 miles per hour.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
gonzo1066
Reg. Oct 2010
Posted 2011-06-15 11:16 PM (#134889 - in reply to #132379)
Subject: RE: '09 F150 vs F250


Veteran


Posts: 264
1001002525
Location: Sumas Washington
Just remember the legal ramifications of towing.  If you decide that because you only tow "once in a while" and go for a light truck you may open yourself for legal issues if you have a accident.  Drivers have been found negligent and charged if the tow vehicle is not satisfactory for the trailer towed.  Nearly all states are getting more picky about this and DOT enforcement has stepped up.   There is also the fact that if you love your horses, you should keep them as safe as you can.    The extra braking power of a 3/4 ton truck is a huge factor..
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Jump to page : 1 2
Now viewing page 1 [25 messages per page]
Jump to forum :
Search this forum
Printer friendly version
E-mail a link to this thread
Message format
 

'
Registered to: Horse Trailer World
(Delete all cookies set by this site)