Posted 2011-01-29 10:12 AM (#129465) Subject: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Member
Posts: 26
We have a 2003 Logan 3H all steel LQ gooseneck that weighs around 12,000 lbs empty, and have been pulling it with an F250 diesel. After doing some research it seems we really need a bigger truck, or a lighter trailer. Or are we ok? Are there aftermarket add-ons that can beef this truck up sufficiently? Or are you limited by the engine? We have had to replace brakes several times on both the trailer and the truck, have had numerous flat tires, and last year had to replace the truck's transmission. Advice appreciated!
Posted 2011-01-29 11:13 AM (#129467 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Veteran
Posts: 264
Location: Sumas Washington
I would encorage you to go for a lighter trailer first. 12000#'s of empty trailer is a bunch. There are some great used LQ trailers available that are nearly two tons less than your trailer.
Posted 2011-01-29 11:32 AM (#129469 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Expert
Posts: 5870
Location: western PA
If your trailer is 12k empty and you haul three horses and gear, you're over weight for your truck.
The Ford diesel and transmission is the same when used in both the 250 and 350 variants. The fact that you live in Durango, will have a strong bearing on the durability of your truck's drive train. One of your mountaineous trips would be equivalant to several of my mountainous excursions, and so would the drive train wear and tear. It's longevity is directly related to the usage it provides.
You can beef up the truck and enhance its performance. You can't change its total weight bearing or towing capabilities, without compromising its structural integrity. Presently you have too large a trailer for your truck, especially when considering your location and usage.
Many flat tires are often caused by under inflation, over weight conditions, mechanical axle problems or cheaply made foreign tires. It basically means that the tires are not up to handling the weights, upon which they are subjected.
Your brakes are short lived because of your high weights and extreme trailering conditions. You might consider a motor braking devise, and using your transmission's lower gears when decending the mountains. Your "million dollar highway" is a difficult challenge for any rig. It and similar roads will exact significant wear on any running gear.
Posted 2011-01-29 1:20 PM (#129471 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Member
Posts: 26
Yes, we do gear down and crawl down the mountains. I love the truck and the trailer, it is going to be hard to decide which one has to go...probably the trailer. What kind of braking system are you meaning?
Posted 2011-01-29 3:00 PM (#129477 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Expert
Posts: 3853
Location: Vermont
Originally written by SarahR on 2011-01-29 11:12 AM
We have a 2003 Logan 3H all steel LQ gooseneck that weighs around 12,000 lbs empty, and have been pulling it with an F250 diesel. After doing some research it seems we really need a bigger truck, or a lighter trailer. Or are we ok? Are there aftermarket add-ons that can beef this truck up sufficiently? Or are you limited by the engine? We have had to replace brakes several times on both the trailer and the truck, have had numerous flat tires, and last year had to replace the truck's transmission. Advice appreciated!
Have you actually WEIGHED the the trailer?...but based on losing your transmission...you are definitely UNDER-trucked for THAT trailer...based on your location...I'd recommend going to a LIGHTER trailer...
Posted 2011-01-29 6:14 PM (#129480 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Expert
Posts: 2453
Location: Northern Utah
Sarah, What year is your truck?
Ford has continued to improve their automatic tranmissions. If you truck has the older 4 speed, They were prone to needing repairs. The newer 5 speed held up very well. And so far the 2011 6 speed is holding up great.
Also the earlier SuperDuties were hard on brakes. My 2000 needed the rotors turned every 36,000 to 40,000 miles because they would warp, I assume from the heat of stopping that truck and the trailers I pulled with it. In 2005 Ford increased the Brake rotor size to help solve that problem. ( Thats why the trucks went from 16" to 18" wheels to allow the room for the larger rotor) I never needed the rotors turned on my 2006 truck. So Ford seemed to have fixed the weak brakes that needed to be replaced often. Also with the 5 speed transmission, you went from a Over Drive Lock Out on the old 4speed tranny to a Tow/Haul on the new TorqueShift 5 speed. The Tow setting kept the Torque Convertor Locked up on down hill grades when coasting so you got some engine braking to help slow the rig that wasn't available with the older 4 speed Auto. These improvements changed my brake repairs from every 36k on the 2000 F350 to over 70k on my 2003 and 2006 trucks.
Bottom line is that if you have a 2003 and newer superduty, it's brakes will last much longer than the 1999 to 2002 Superduties, doing the same work.
My 4H Logan XT with the Platinum LQ weighs in at 16,000 loaded with horses and water. So I'm sure its right in that same weight range as your trailer.
As far as tires, on a trailer that heavy, You have no choice but to run Load Range G tires if you want to stay with a 16" tire. And Goodyear G614s are the best in that weight range. Logan has installed them as the factory installed tire for the past 4 years. If the tire problem you are having is on the truck, Step up to the next size larger to help get more capacity.
If you do look to change trucks, The F350 do offer some features over the F250. And the Brake master controller is one of those features that is improved by buying the 1 ton vs the 3/4 ton truck.
Posted 2011-01-29 7:03 PM (#129483 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Member
Posts: 26
It's a 2000, and an automatic. We did upgrade the truck tires (I think you are one of the people who's brain I picked on that) and they have been good for a few years now. The trailer...come to think of it the tires that came with the trailer (new from Logan)lasted a long time. We have been pulling this trailer with this truck since 2003, in the mountains and desert, but after replacing the transmission I thought I'd better do some research on what our truck's capabilities actually are. I think we will go look at a trailer locally this week, a 4H aluminum with LQ that weighs 5,500. That is just a little more than half the weight of our current 3H LQ.
Posted 2011-01-29 7:36 PM (#129484 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Veteran
Posts: 264
Location: Sumas Washington
There are exhaust brakes that would help you in the Mountains. PacBrake is the one I recommend, however they don't work as well in automatic transmission trucks. You wind up with a lot of extra money in trans controllers to make the exhaust brake effective. Lighter trailer should be your top consideration. With that I would make sure that the trailer has the largest brakes available for the axle size it has. The last thing you want is to have your beautiful rig, your beautiful horses and yourself in some canyon because you overloaded the truck. Also there is some concern over legal aspects of hauling overloaded. If it can be proven that your overloaded truck CONTRIBUTED to a accident you are liable for damages.
Posted 2011-01-29 8:13 PM (#129491 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Extreme Veteran
Posts: 379
Location: Missouri
WOW! 12,000lbs empty. We use a GMC C4500 to pull our 15,000lbs trailer. If it were me, I'd replace the truck, it's 11 years old and will probably cost less then replacing the trailer.
Posted 2011-01-30 9:51 AM (#129502 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Member
Posts: 26
This has been very educational, thanks sooooo much! I am still not sure what I want to do. We could get a different, but older trailer for around $20,000, and probably get $17,000 for our trailer, if we can sell it (I am guessing it is a slow market for LQ trailers). A newer bigger truck is going to be more than a $3000 difference. I have a lot to think over. We do have a an older beat around stock combo trailer for day rides around here, though.
Posted 2011-02-03 9:02 PM (#129760 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Regular
Posts: 74
Location: NW
To pick the brains on here: what about an '03 Dodge 3/4T, 4x4 ext cab w/Cummins & 6 spd manual pulling a 3H w/LQ GN that weighs 11,000# empty? My current trailer is much smaller/lighter, but I like the options on this other one. Do NOT want to chg trucks.Any insight pls?
Posted 2011-02-04 10:09 AM (#129779 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Expert
Posts: 2453
Location: Northern Utah
Rocky, Look at your door panel and see what your truck is rated to tow.
I suspect with a 3/4 ton truck, your problem will be with pin weight in the bed. An 11,000lb trailer plus several 1000 lb horses in the back will be 13,000 to 15,000 lbs. Pin weight is roughly 25% of total trailer weight. 13,000 lbs x 25% = 3250 lbs on the pin. And I bet your 3/4 ton truck is not set up for that much weight over the rear axle.
Posted 2011-02-04 3:09 PM (#129799 - in reply to #129465) Subject: RE: Bigger truck or light trailer?
Regular
Posts: 74
Location: NW
I'll take a look when I go out next. I will be hauling 1 or 2 horses - very seldom if at all - 3. But we are in the mountains & do NOT want to get overweight up here :)