Posted 2021-03-01 7:30 PM (#173514 - in reply to #173513) Subject: RE: LAKOTA OR EXISS
New User
Posts: 1
I have a 2016 EXISS. I know they aren't the top of the line, but I couldn't find what I wanted in a used better brand. I am happy with mine. I chose Exiss over Lakota because the floor is aluminum and the height is 7'6". The rubber on the stall walls is very thin, so the horses have torn it up. Not sure of the thickness in the Lakota. I think the LQ interiors are similar. I haven't had any problems with my LQ. Hope that helps some.
Posted 2021-03-02 6:04 AM (#173516 - in reply to #173513) Subject: RE: LAKOTA OR EXISS
Elite Veteran
Posts: 720
I think it is a nice middle of the road brand. There are better, there are worse. Also- there are 3 build levels too, so did you look at a Colt, Charger, or Bighorn???
Posted 2021-03-02 6:31 PM (#173517 - in reply to #173513) Subject: RE: LAKOTA OR EXISS
Regular
Posts: 70
We have been looking at just about every brand built and offered here in North Texas. The Lakota Chargers seems to be built way matter than anything comparable as far as structure goes. All of them seem to be lacking in the LQ department unless you start looking at 80 to 100k trailers....
We even looked at some Cimarrons and 4 Star with some sort of Outlaw Proline interior and was not impressed at all. Cheap walls and ceiling like lower end trailers.
Posted 2021-03-03 9:12 AM (#173518 - in reply to #173513) Subject: RE: LAKOTA OR EXISS
Elite Veteran
Posts: 690 Location: missouri
Neither.. Look at some of the good brands in a used LQ like 4Star/Cimmarron/Elite/Hart/Twister... built to last... I don't like the "Proline" LQ either... look like cheap campers.
LAKOTA OR EXISS
