Trouble hauling through Iowa
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-28 11:25 PM (#66684)
Subject: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Just a little story about my drive home from Canadian Nationals.  Everything was going fine considering the length of our trip, no flat tires, minimal construction and an easy border crossing.  We had just finished a 2 hour rest stop at a lovely Iowa rest area with shaded area to park under and fresh cold water for the horses.  I was ready to get back in the truck and start my "tank of gas" shift.  We were back on I-29 heading south nearing the Missouri border when I noticed an Iowa state trooper fly past me and pull up next to the truck and trailer I was following.  Next thing I know we are both on the side of the road with drivers license and registration in hand.  We were only doing 60mph, seat belts on and I was pretty sure we both paid for fuel at the last stop.  After an hour on the side of the road it was my turn to sit in the cruiser.  It turns out I was in violation of 12 regulations, there were more but officer no.394 was nice enough to stop there.  Apparently the F-350 dually and 3 horse living quarter trailer I was pulling was considered a commercial motor vehicle and I was not qualified to drive it nor was it in compliance with the regulations of a CMV.  The GVWR of my truck(10,000) and trailer(20,000) is 30,000lbs There other truck and trailer was also cited being that it was an F-550 and 8 horse trailer and over the GVWR.  Both "rigs" were over the weight limit of a Class C driver's license, which we were informed is a combined truck and trailer GVWR of 26,001 pounds.  The list of 12 violations included, no in truck fire extinguisher (the one in the trailer doesn't count), insufficient warning devices (triangles), no record of duty status, driver failing to retain previous 7 days log, driver vehicle inspection report, operating a CMV without a periodic inspection (got that one twice), not being licensed for type of vehicle being operated, no drivers medical certificate on driver's possession, no pretrip inspection and finally a log violation. Also we did not a DOT number displayed or an ID number or name on the side of the truck.  Fortunally, I was only cited for three of those offensed, officer no.394's printer ran out of paper, my lucky day.  He also informed me I was now "out of service until qualified" and had it not been 97 degrees outside he would have pulled us off the road.  After 3 hours on the side of the road he didn't want the horses to ge sick.  So we got back on the road and got the hell out of Iowa and made sure to call all the other farms headed south and told them to avoid I-29.  A few hours later we got a call from another farm who had just passed through Iowa and said a road block had been set up for all horse trailers on I-29 and they had them lined up on the side of the road. 

After returing home and trying to sleep I did a little reasearch.  I remember hearing about some type of regulations on horse trailers about 20 years ago, but I have not had in trouble in that amount of time.  I went to the FMCSR website which was mostly useless but I did find out that the tickets and violations I recieved on my pick up truck and recreational horse trailer do fit under the CMV regulations.  A class A drivers license is required for any combination of vehicles with a GVWR of 26,001 or more lbs. provided the GVWR of the towed vehicle is in excess of 10,000lbs. Don't some two horse trailers weigh more than 10,000lbs.  After I got the tickets I was curious about the actual weight of my truck and trailer.  At the next fuel stop I weighted it on a CAT scale, with a full tank of diesel, 2 horses, 14' living quarter with a generator, 7 peoples luggage, and 4 dogs it came out with a gross weight of 22,760lbs.  It breaks down like this steering axle 4540lbs., drive axel 7560lbs. and trailer axel 10,660 lbs. 

I just wanted to pass on my experience and see if anyone else has gone through something like this.  With just the little reasearch I have done it seems as though these laws and regulations are really going to hurt the horse industry.  I encourage all of you to haul to do some research and really think about the impact this is going to have on your life, whether it is your livelihood or just for recreation. I will post some links and other information soon and would encourage others to do so as well.

Thanks

 



Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-03 10:26 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-28 11:56 PM (#66687 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

We went thru Iowa the end of July with a 3500 Dodge dually pulling a 4 horse 14 ft lq trailer.  No trooper.  Suggest you might want to contact some branch of Iowa state government as this situation sounds very weird to me.  Personally I think I would start with the Office of the Attorney General.  Surely Iowa does not want people avoiding the state like it has plague....especially since so many of us east of the Ms River need to travel thru Iowa to get to the Dakotas etc.

Also you may want to contact any breed organizations about this.... AQHA maybe?

My understanding was that if we were legal in our home state then we were legal everywhere....but what do I know.....

Or was the State of Iowa on a fundraising mission?



Edited by rose 2007-08-29 12:06 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 12:09 AM (#66690 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Thanks for the reply and ideas.  I plan on sending and email to all the organizations and publications.  Two of the people with me have family members who are lawyers and letters to the state of Iowa are already underway.  Another posting suggested we all contact Larry Minor Director of Bus and Standards and Operations at the Federal Motor Carriers Safety Asociation since they are the ones that came up with the regulations.  His email is larry.minor@fmcsa.dot.gov .  It seems like we have all been getting lucky for a long time.  According to the FMCSA many of the regulations are going be be more widely inforced starting Sept. 29, 2007.  Here is the website for FMCSA  http://www.fmcsa.dot.gov/ and for the regulations try http://www.fmcsr.dot.gov/

Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-08-29 12:10 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
notfromtexas
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 3:26 AM (#66691 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Veteran


Posts: 294
100100252525
Location: Fort Worth, Tx

Boy...that stinks.  I can see citing you if you had been driving recklessly, speeding or something like that, but sounds like the p.o. was just in a bad mood, to not let you off with just a warning.  I wonder if this had anything to do with the NAIS?  Getting to be that you have to have a lawyer to haul next door......

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
farmbabe
Reg. Nov 2003
Posted 2007-08-29 6:58 AM (#66694 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 1723
1000500100100
Location: michigan

Why would  AQHA be of any help? PS- candaian nationals is an arabian horse show.......

 

This is a matter for a good lawyer.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Iowa NBHA Webmaster
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 7:24 AM (#66695 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 17

Location: Stockport, Iowa

I live in Iowa and to be honest, if you ask 2 different officers, you will probably get two different answers.

I found this on the Iowa DOT website, make sure to check out page 30 and 31 of the Document (I did a search for horses).

http://www.iamvd.com/omve/truckguide.pdf

I have some friends who are in the law enforcement field, I will try to get an answer from them.



Edited by Iowa NBHA Webmaster 2007-08-29 7:30 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
CurlyRidingcowboy
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 7:54 AM (#66699 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 42
25
Location: MN
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
CurlyRidingcowboy
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 8:05 AM (#66701 - in reply to #66699)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 42
25
Location: MN

I live in Minnesota My wife manages a feed store. For a spring promotion she had a DOT lady come in and go over trailer laws with her customers on a saturday. We used her cousins trailer for a demonstrator vehicle. When she was done with his truck and trailer she said that she could have gave him a long list of tickets along with an out of service tag. But since he was there being a good sport for education he got told to fix it.

If you are hauling your own personall horses in a living quarters trailer it is considered a RV and a Class A/ DOT requirements are not required.

If you do not have a living quarters or the horses are not yours you are required to follow all Comercial vehicle requirements for you vehicle over 20lbs. Now no matter what the weight is in Minnesota if you are commerical hauling you need full Commercial insections as well.

His truck and trailer. 2003 F350 4x4 shortbox non dually with a 4 horse featherlite big horse. She said wether he used for his business or not ( he is a farrier and horse transporter)

 He needs to have a class A license which he did have, but what he didnt have was:

A dot number, Dot inspection, Federal Fuel tax permit ( he transports out of state), Job application in glove box, Name on the side of the truck, marker lights on the roof of truck,  log book, Working break away cable.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 8:36 AM (#66702 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

I have to say something here,and I may get blasted from people about it,but,I'm used to that on here.I personally think that is a bunch of BULL S---!!

You can pull all the sorry looking crap you want to all over our state,most without tags,ect.Big farm trucks,running up and down the roads during harvest (I'm not protesting because we're farmers) but who the H-- cares if those guys trying to make an honest living getting a crop out has a commercial license,ect.?

I see all sorts of rigs going up and down the road in Missouri,too,not to mention Mississippi (we won't even talk about stuff on the road there and in Louisiana.) And what does anybody care THERE? They don't.

I don't think they have enough to do up there in Iowa,myself.It's just about the silliest thing I've ever heard,and a blatant all out discriminatory effort to find a way to stick it to some out of staters going through there pulling a horse trailer,for crying out loud.

How the H--- do they think that everybody passing through each state using the highways that tax dollars out of every taxpayer and consumer in the country have paid for is going to know each law in each state?

I think those cops need to be worried about things a little more serious that are affecting this country than some horse trailers passing through THEIR territory that they can take advantage of.Such as:drugs. I'm sure Iowa is not an exception,hickey as it is (And I'm from the king of Hickey states myself,I'll admit) in that they've got them there,too.

There are no real freedoms anymore.Pulling over horse trailers? Come on.I don't think they are busy enough.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
CurlyRidingcowboy
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 9:09 AM (#66704 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 42
25
Location: MN
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
CurlyRidingcowboy
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 9:11 AM (#66705 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 42
25
Location: MN
I completely agree they would have been things to do I had little crack in my windshield. People were flying by me way over the post speed and I got pulled over for the crack in the windshield and got a fix it ticket. They have trailer laws out there and I guess we have to follow them, or run the risk of getting a fix it ticket.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 9:33 AM (#66708 - in reply to #66705)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

We were taking our LQ trailer that we had traded up to Missouri to meet up with the man bringing the other one at a certain designation.

We were pulled over by one of Arkansas' finest,and he must have known exactly where to sit to pull US over with over 40' of rig,because there was only one place we could pull over at that spot.Had he not caught us there,we would have had to have driven several miles,lights flashing and probably several other hillbilliy gestapos on the way before we could safely pull over.

Anyway,we couldn't imagine what in the world he was stopping us for.We were by no means speeding,trying to climb a long hill,truckers and others flying by like we were sitting still,ect.He was polite,asked for  driver's license and insurance proof,and walked around the trailer,looked in the bed at the hitch,I'm assuming,since Arkansas recently enacted safety chain laws (can you believe it??)

Then he tells us calmly,'You guys are running with your park lights on,you know,that's illegal to do here."

I thought,"WHAT???" Pull us over with a rig that took half a football field to get into,people passing by all the while like they were going to a fire,and we'd met deer hunters by the tons that day with old trailers/no tags,probably had stolen 4 wheelers loaded on them,no tagged deer,ect.already.(First day of deer hunt.)

We have automatic light function on our truck,and he'd turned the lights on manually,but just had not turned the switch far enough over for the headlights to come on.We explained it to the officer.We had no idea,but we knew about the parking light law anyway.He politely gave us a warning and sent us off,and went on his way,presumably to catch another big horse trailer coming through.

We met about 6 cars down the road driving with their park lights on.I'd loved to have been able to turn around and go back,see what happened.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 9:57 AM (#66710 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA

I live in Iowa, and this has been going on for several years now.  One of my friends was pulling his living quarters trailer down the interstate with no horses in it, and drove past the weigh station without pulling in.  One of the DOT officers then proceeded to chase him down and made him come back to the scales.  They then threw the book at him similar to what happened to keeponhaulin. 

The DOT in Iowa seems to think that there is some easy money to be made cracking down on laws that pertain to the trucking industry.  An officer from the DOT spoke at the Iowa Horse Fair this past spring, and he primarily explained how they interpret the law. If your GVW rating of your truck and trailer combined exceeds 26,000 pounds, you are required to have a CDL and meet all the requirements that having a CDL entails, no matter why you are hauling.  If you are under 26,000 combined, you are OK with a class C license, as long as you aren't using your vehicle for commerce.   However, they define commerce as anything that adds value to your horse, such as showing.   Also, they consider hauling a mare to a farm to get bred as commerce, or selling a horse at auction.

I asked specifically that since I don't deduct any expenses for my horses on my taxes, and consider it strictly a hobby, if these regulations applied to me.  His response was that they aren't the IRS, and yes they do apply to me.  My wife and I then decided that if we are ever stopped by the DOT, we are always coming from a trail ride, and never a show or a roping.

The only exception to the above laws is if you can get your vehicle registered as an RV, then these laws don't apply to you.  The frustrating part is that there can be an 85 year old guy driving his Freightliner pulling a huge 5th wheel travel trailer and they can't touch him, but they can get all over me because I've been to the local horse show and had a chance to win $10.

I think the horse industry needs to get a better organized and get some lobbyists, as that is what the RV industry has done.  Until this happens, unfortunately we'll hear even more of this kind of thing, whether it's Iowa or some other state that decides that there is some easy ticket money to be had.

 



Edited by dblhocker 2007-08-31 9:35 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 10:15 AM (#66711 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

OK   I admit that I did not know that the Canadian Nationals was an Arabian horse show.  Now as to AQHA, they are large, well organized and very interested in everything that affects the use of horses in the United States.  They offered legal assistance to the Shawnee and were rebuffed (yeah, I know....goofy). 

Having said that, I am a lawyer.  We are legal in TN and our trailers DO NOT have tags because we are a farm.  We tried to get the BRAND INSPECTOR in South Dakota to come inspect our horses and papers.  He REFUSED to come to the camp;  wanted us to load up and come to a town where there was NO PLACE to unload the horses safely.  THAT counts as a REFUSAL.  We did not get stopped anywhere, BUT I was READY and LOADED for BEAR.....AND LITIGATION. 

 I still think Iowa is looking for easy money because people will get the h--- out of the state and just mail in the fines.  In the olden days, there were certain counties in certain states that always had speed traps looking for out of state plates for this reason.

So again I say, if you are legal in your state then you are legal everywhere.  It is called the Commerce Clause in the US Constitution.....that is why you do not have border crossings at every state line.  IMO Iowa is VIOLATING the US Constition since they are IMPEDING interstate commerce.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 10:32 AM (#66715 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA
It would be interesting to find out if keeponhaulin' is considered legal in Texas, since the GVWR of their rig is over the 26,000 pound threshhold.  Most gooseneck trailers of any size have 7000 pound axles, which puts means most of them have a GVWR rating of at least 14,000 pounds or more.  Most newer dually pickups now have a GVWR rating of at least 12,500, which puts you over the 26,000 pound threshhold no matter what you actually weigh. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 10:41 AM (#66718 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

I wonder what DOT would do if EVERY dually owner simultaneously asked for DOT numbers

AND every farm trailer likewise

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
mike and darcy
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 10:49 AM (#66720 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Regular


Posts: 67
2525
Location: georgia

  Rose, Go get em girl!!!!

 dbhocker, I have a small part time golf cart business and sell small equipment trailers to go whith them.

This is the information I get from my trailer supplier.

The axles with 5 lugs are #3500, the axles with 6 lugs are called #5200, the ones with 8 lugs are called #7000.

Now for the funny part a #5200 6 lug axle actually weighs more that the 8 lug #7000.

I just looked at our big 4 horse, it has 8 lug wheels but has an id tag of 10,400 GVR.

Now I'm completely confused.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 10:59 AM (#66721 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA

Mike and darcy, I believe you can actually get 5,200 lb. and 6000 lb axles that have 8 lugs.  My guess is that you actually have 5,200 lb axles instead of 7,000. The only way to really tell for sure is to crawl under your trailer and the axles should have a tag on them which indicates what weight they actually are rated for. 

The ironic thing about all of this to me is that people have been preaching to make sure you have enough truck for your trailer, make sure you are safe.  Now that some people are following this advice and upgrading to a truck that is safer, it's coming back to bite them in the butt.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 11:04 AM (#66723 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

ok out of curiousity I looked up the weight stuff in the Tennessee Code and I am going to try to copy it here:

<script language=JavaScript> //Check for Chapter publications. If a chapter pub, then display link to Chapter child window var url = location.href; document.writeln('');
Show Full ChapterShow Full ChapterEmail This PagePrint This Page

<meta content="NextPage - LivePublish" name=Author><link href="/images/customcontent.css" type=text/css rel=stylesheet><script language=Javascript> function RedirectUrl(strRealPath, strLookFor, strResolve) { //alert("Calling RedirectUrl"); strCurrentLocation='' + window.location; nQueryIndex=strCurrentLocation.indexOf("?"); if(nQueryIndex!=-1) { strQuery=strCurrentLocation.substr(nQueryIndex, strCurrentLocation.length); } else { strQuery=""; } //alert(strQuery + 'Location is ' + strCurrentLocation + "Real path is " + strRealPath + " and lookfor is " + strLookFor + " " + strCurrentLocation.length + " and strResolve is " + strResolve); strNewLocation=''; iReplaceAt=strCurrentLocation.indexOf(strLookFor); //alert("IReplaceAt is " + iReplaceAt); iReplaceAt=iReplaceAt-1; strNewLocation=strCurrentLocation.substr(0, iReplaceAt); //alert("strNewLocation is " + strNewLocation); strNewLocation=strNewLocation+strRealPath; strNewLocation=strNewLocation+strResolve; strNewLocation=strNewLocation+strQuery; //alert('New location is ' + strNewLocation); self.location=strNewLocation; }

55-7-203. Maximum weight per axle or group of axles allowed. —

Except as otherwise provided by law, no freight motor vehicle shall be operated over, on, or upon the public highways of this state where the total weight on a single axle or any group of axles exceeds the weight limitations set forth below in subdivisions (1)-(7).

     (1(ANo axle shall carry a load in excess of twenty thousand pounds (20,000 lbs.).

          (BAxle combinations and fifth wheel placement on the tractor shall ensure equal weight distribution on weight carrying axle combinations, and such axle combination shall be equipped with brakes having power motivation.

          (CAn axle load as set out herein is defined as the total load transmitted to the road by all wheels whose centers may be included between two (2) parallel transverse vertical planes, forty inches (40²) apart, extending across the full width of the vehicle.

     (2The total gross weight concentrated on the highway surface from any tandem axle group shall not exceed thirty-four thousand pounds (34,000 lbs.) for each such tandem axle group. “Tandem axle group” means two (2) or more axles spaced forty inches (40²) or more apart from center to center having at least one (1) common point of weight suspension.

     (3The total gross weight of a vehicle, freight motor vehicle, truck-tractor, trailer or semitrailer or combinations of such vehicles operated over, on or upon the public highways of this state shall not exceed eighty thousand pounds (80,000 lbs.); provided, that none of the foregoing shall be operated over or on the interstate system of this state where the total gross weight of such vehicle or combination thereof including the load therein exceeds seventy-three thousand two hundred eighty pounds (73,280 lbs.) or where the weight exceeds eighteen thousand pounds (18,000 lbs.) on any single axle or where the weight exceeds thirty-two thousand pounds (32,000 lbs.) on any tandem axle group unless the weight is distributed on a group of two (2) or more consecutive axles produced by application of the following formula:

(Click here to view Equation)

Where W = overall gross weight on any group of two (2) or more consecutive axles to the nearest five hundred pounds (500 lbs.), L = distance in feet between the extreme of any group of two (2) or more consecutive axles, and N = number of axles in group under consideration, except that two (2) consecutive sets of tandem axles may carry a gross load of thirty-four thousand pounds (34,000 lbs.) each, where the overall distance between the first and last axles of such consecutive sets of tandem axles is thirty-six feet (36") or more, except such vehicles, or combinations thereof operating under special permits now authorized by law; provided, that wherever a maximum permissive gross weight of eighty thousand pounds (80,000 lbs.) or of lengths prescribed in § 55-7-201 or a height of thirteen and one-half feet (13 ½") is authorized for any vehicle or combination of vehicles, it is the legislative intent that the prescribed weight, length, and height limits shall be strictly enforced, and it is unlawful for any state, county, or municipal officer to allow or permit any additional weight, length or height by way of tolerance or otherwise, except that the commissioner of transportation may issue special permits pursuant to § 55-7-205.

     (4“Freight motor vehicle,” as used in this section, includes both the tractor or truck and the trailer, semitrailer or trailers, if any, and the weight of any such combination shall not exceed the maximum fixed herein; provided, that no freight motor vehicle with motive power shall haul more than one (1) vehicle unless otherwise provided.

     (5No freight motor vehicle shall haul a trailer on any highway of this state when such trailer (including its load) weighs more than three thousand five hundred pounds (3,500 lbs.). Such restrictions on hauling a trailer in excess weight of three thousand five hundred pounds (3,500 lbs.) by a freight motor vehicle, as described in the preceding sentence, shall not be applicable whenever a converter dolly or equivalent fixed connection having the same safety characteristics is appropriately installed or placed under the trailer to be hauled by such freight motor vehicle. For the purposes hereof, “trailer” means a vehicle without motive power designed or used for carrying freight or property wholly on its own structure; provided, that it is not unlawful for any motor vehicle subject to this part to have a semitrailer, which, for the purposes hereof, is defined as a vehicle for the carrying of property or freight and so designed that some part of the weight of such semitrailer or its load rests upon or is carried by the motor vehicle to which it is attached. The hauling of a trailer (to the extent herein permitted) or a semitrailer shall be subject to the further provisions hereof. This part is not intended to prohibit the movements of spools carrying wire or cable, when used for construction or repair purposes. The weight limitation respecting trailers shall not be applicable to implements designed to distribute fertilizer while such vehicles are being drawn by a freight motor vehicle between the plant and the farm.

     (6If the gross weight of a freight motor vehicle does not exceed the sum obtained by computing the total weight allowable for the number and type of its axles, the driver shall not be cited for violation of an axle weight limitation while transporting crushed stone, fill dirt and rock, soil, bulk sand, coal, clay, shale, phosphate muck, asphalt, concrete, other building materials, solid waste, tankage or animal residues, livestock and agricultural products, or agricultural limestone over the state highway system other than the portion designated as the interstate system.

     (7For purposes of enforcement of this section, weight restrictions shall be deemed to have a margin of error of ten percent (10%) of the true gross or axle weight for all logging, sand, coal, clay, shale, phosphate, solid waste, recovered materials, farm trucks and machinery trucks when being operated over the state highway system other than the portion designated as the interstate system. For the purposes of this subdivision (7):

          (A“Clay truck” means those trucks used for hauling clay from the place of extraction to the place where such clay is used or processed;

          (B“Coal truck” means those trucks used for hauling coal and coal products;

          (C“Farm truck” means those trucks utilized by farmers to load grain, fiber, produce, livestock, milk or other agricultural products produced on their farms and to transport such agricultural commodities to their respective markets. Such trucks include farm to market transportation when the truck is operated by the farmer, the farmer's family or employee or a representative hired by the farmer to haul the commodity;

          (D“Logging truck” means those trucks used for hauling logs, pulpwood, bark, wood chips or wood dust from the woods to the mill or from the mill to a loading or storage place or market;

          (E“Machinery truck” means those trucks used for hauling machinery by the owner/operator within a one hundred (100) mile radius of the base location of such owner/operator's area of operation, subject to the limitation of one (1) such truck per owner/operator;

          (F“Phosphate truck” means those trucks used for hauling phosphate, phosphate products, or other raw materials used in the manufacture of phosphorus;

          (G“Recovered materials truck” means those trucks used for hauling recovered materials, as defined in § 68-211-802, but only while those materials are being hauled from the point of generation to the facility where they will be processed for subsequent shipment to an end-user;

          (H“Sand truck” means those trucks used for hauling raw sand from the place of extraction to the place where such sand is used or processed; provided, that if the commissioner of transportation is formally notified by an appropriate federal officer that as a result of any provision of Acts 1989, ch. 349, adding sand trucks to this subdivision (7) that Tennessee will lose federal funds, then such act shall be void and inoperative;

          (I“Shale truck” means those trucks used for hauling shale from the place of extraction to the place where such shale is used or processed; and

          (J“Solid waste truck” means those trucks used for hauling solid waste, as defined in § 68-211-802, but only while such solid waste is being collected and being hauled from the place or places of collection to a landfill or disposal facility.

[Acts 1933, ch. 35, § 2; 1935 (E.S.), ch. 17, § 1; 1939, ch. 105, § 6; 1941, ch. 84, § 3; 1945, ch. 164, § 3; C. Supp. 1950, § 2715.3 (Williams, §§ 1166.33, 2715.2); Acts 1959, ch. 87, § 3; 1963, ch. 103, §§ 3, 4; 1970, ch. 501, § 2; 1976, ch. 411, § 1; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 59-1109; Acts 1981, ch. 448, § 6; 1981, ch. 535, §§ 1-3; 1982, ch. 904, § 2; 1982, ch. 912, § 3; 1982, ch. 953, §§ 6, 8; 1983, ch. 319, § 6; 1987, ch. 425, §§ 1-3, 5, 6; 1988, ch. 642, §§ 1-5; 1988, ch. 1028, § 1; T.C.A., § 55-11-203; Acts 1989, ch. 35, §§ 1, 2; 1989, ch. 349, §§ 1-3; 1994, ch. 673, § 1; 1995, ch. 139, §§ 1, 2; 1995, ch. 220, § 1; 1996, ch. 882, §§ 1, 2, 4, 5.]

<form name=LPHitCountForm>

 

<script type=text/javascript> // Hit Tracker - object for moving between hit anchors in a document//// Features:// * No FolioHitCount form is needed.// * First hit doesn't have to be LPHit1.// * Detects some binary documents.// * Works around IE 5.5 bug changing location.hash in XML.// constantsvar hit_prefix = "LPHit";// constructorfunction HitTracker(document_window){ // public this.prevMatch = HitTracker_prevMatch; // Move to previous match. Returns false if at first. this.nextMatch = HitTracker_nextMatch; // Move to next match. Returns false if at last. this.isTracking = HitTracker_isTracking; // Able to track hits on this document? // private this.construct = HitTracker_construct; this.checkState = HitTracker_checkState; this.moveToAnchor = HitTracker_moveToAnchor; this.document_window = null; this.document_object = null; this.first_match = null; this.current_match = null; this.total_matches = null; this.total_anchors = null; this.pathname = null;}// public methodsfunction HitTracker_prevMatch(document_window){ var ok = false; this.checkState(document_window); if (this.document_object != null) { if (this.current_match -1 >= this.first_match) { this.moveToAnchor(hit_prefix + (--this.current_match)); ok = true; } } return ok;}function HitTracker_nextMatch(document_window){ var ok = false; this.checkState(document_window); if (this.document_object != null) { if (this.current_match + 1 <= this.total_matches) { this.moveToAnchor(hit_prefix + (++this.current_match)); ok = true; } } return ok;}function HitTracker_isTracking(document_window){ // Is this a document that the browser renders natively, or is a // plug-in/activex involved? If this is a non-native document, we // can't do anything about navigating hits. this.checkState(document_window); return this.document_object != null;}// private methodsfunction HitTracker_construct(document_window){ this.document_window = document_window; this.document_object = document_window.document; this.first_match = HitTracker_getFirstMatch(document_window.document); this.current_match = this.first_match; this.total_matches = HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_window.document) - (this.first_match - 1); this.total_anchors = document_window.document.anchors.length; this.pathname = document_window.location.pathname;// alert("Construct: first=" + this.first_match + " current=" + this.current_match + " total=" + this.total_matches); }function HitTracker_checkState(document_window){ if (HitTracker_isTrackableDocument(document_window)) { if (document_window.location.pathname != this.pathname) { this.construct(document_window); } else if (this.total_anchors != document_window.document.anchors.length) { // in case they moved to a different match before the document finished loading this.total_matches = HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_window.document) - (this.first_match - 1); this.total_anchors = document_window.document.anchors.length; } } else { this.document_object = null; }}function HitTracker_moveToAnchor(anchor){ this.document_window.location.hash = anchor; if (this.document_window.location.hash != anchor) { // work around IE 5.5 bug if (-1 != navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 5.5")) { for (var a = 0; a < this.document_window.document.anchors.length; a++) { if (this.document_window.document.anchors[a].name == anchor) { this.document_window.document.anchors[a].scrollIntoView(); break; } } } }}// static methodsfunction HitTracker_getFirstMatch(document_object){ var first_match = 1; for (var a = 0; a < document_object.anchors.length; a++) { if (document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(0, hit_prefix.length) == hit_prefix) { first_match = parseInt(document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(hit_prefix.length)); break; } } return first_match;}function HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_object){ var total_matches = 0; for (var a = 0; a < document_object.anchors.length; a++) { if (document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(0, hit_prefix.length) == hit_prefix) { total_matches++; } } return total_matches;}function HitTracker_isTrackableDocument(document_window){ // Windows containing MS Office documents do not have a window.document property. Any // attempt to reference it or detect its presence will result in a JavaScript runtime // error. So we'll do our best to detect it. var doc_ok = true; // try to determine if this is an office document by checking the file extension var path = document_window.location.pathname; var ext_index = path.lastIndexOf("."); if (ext_index != -1) { var ext = path.substring(ext_index); if (ext == ".doc" || ext == ".pdf" || ext == ".xls" || ext == ".ppt") { doc_ok = false; } } return doc_ok;}function HitTracker_handleError(message, url, line) { alert("Error: " + message + "\nLocation: " + url + "\nLine: " + line); return true; } var use_viewer = "Please use the document's viewer to navigate hits.";function getDocumentWindow() { if (top.main == null) { return top; } // top.main exists if (top.main.doc == null) { return top.main; } // top.main.doc exists return top.main.doc;}function getScriptName(){ var path = location.pathname; path = path.substring(0, path.indexOf('.') + 4); return path;}function getCookie(cookie_name) { var cookie = document.cookie; var script_cookie_name = getScriptName() + "/" + cookie_name; script_cookie_name = script_cookie_name.substring(1); var index = cookie.indexOf(script_cookie_name + "="); if (-1 == index) { return ""; } index = cookie.indexOf("=", index); if (-1 == index) { return ""; } var endstr = cookie.indexOf(";", index); if (-1 == endstr) { endstr = cookie.length; } var cookie_value = unescape(cookie.substring(index + 1, endstr)); if (cookie_value == null || cookie_value == "null" || cookie_value == "" || cookie_value.indexOf("undefined") >= 0 || cookie_value.lastIndexOf("=") == cookie_value.length - 1) { cookie_value = ""; } return cookie_value;}function doClearQuery(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + '?f=hitlist&t=' + redirect_template + '&c=redirect&q='; top.docnav.window.location.reload(true);}function doHideResults(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + "?f=hitlist&c=curr"; top.docnav.update();}function doCloseResultWindow(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + "?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm"; top.docnav.update();}function getFrameWindow(frame_name){ var frame_window = null; if(frame_name == "_self") { return window; } if (frame_name != null && frame_name.length > 0) { frame_window = parent.frames[frame_name] } else { frame_window = window; } return frame_window;}function displayQueryResults() { top.main.location.href = getScriptName() + '?f=templates&fn=main-hit-h.htm';}function doPrevNextHit(prev){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (!hit_tracker.isTracking(doc_window)) { alert(use_viewer); } else { if (prev) { if (!hit_tracker.prevMatch(doc_window)) { if (confirm("There are no more hits in this document.\nMove to the previous document with hits?")) { doPrevHitDoc(); } } } else { if (!hit_tracker.nextMatch(doc_window)) { if (confirm("There are no more hits in this document.\nMove to the next document with hits?")) { doNextHitDoc(); } } } } return false;}function doPrevHit(){ doPrevNextHit(true);}function doNextHit(){ doPrevNextHit(false);}function doPrevDoc(document_frame_name, template){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=Prevdoc&t=' + template + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000); }}function doNextDoc(document_frame_name, template){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=Nextdoc&t=' + template + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000); }}function doPrevHitDoc(document_frame_name){ var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { if (doc_window.isHitListStart != null && doc_window.isHitListStart == 1) { // it is already at the hitListStart, do nothing } else { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=hitlist&c=prev&gh=1' + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#LPHit1'; } }}function doNextHitDoc(document_frame_name){ var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { if (doc_window.isHitListEnd != null && doc_window.isHitListEnd == 1) { // it is already at the hitListEnd, do nothing } else { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=hitlist&c=next&gh=1' + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#LPHit1'; } }}function doSynchronizeContents(contents_frame_name, contents_frame_url){ var current_document = escape(getCookie("doc")); // whack any leading slash character var index = current_document.indexOf("/"); if (index == 0) { current_document = current_document.substring(1); } var contents_window = getFrameWindow(contents_frame_name); if (contents_window != null) { if (contents_window.document.JTOC == null) { var url = contents_frame_url + '&cp=' + current_document + '&c=100&sync=2&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#TOCSYNC'; contents_window.location.href = url; } else { if(contents_window.document.JTOC != null) { contents_window.document.JTOC.syncTOC(current_document); } else if(contents_frame_url != null) { contents_window.location = contents_frame_url; } } }}function doReference(template){ var ref_window = window.open(template, "Reference", "width=500,height=175,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no"); if (_js_ >= 1.1) { ref_window.focus(); }}function viewSearchForm(search_form_params, toc_template, no_toc_template, options){ // search_form_params looks like this: // frame-type:search-form-id if (search_form_params != "#NoForm") { var delim_offset = search_form_params.indexOf(":"); if (delim_offset != -1) { var frame_type = search_form_params.substring(0, delim_offset); var search_form_id = search_form_params.substring(delim_offset+1); var component; switch (frame_type) { case "contents": component = "?f=templates&fn=" + toc_template; component = "?f=templates&fn=" + no_toc_template; break; case "no-contents": component = "?f=templates&fn=" + no_toc_template; break; default: component = "?f=searchforms"; break; } parent.main.window.location = getScriptName() + component + "&id=" + search_form_id + "&" + options; } }}function getInfobaseName(contentPath){ if (contentPath == null || contentPath == "") { return null; } var cp = contentPath; if (cp[0] == '/') { cp = cp.substring(1); } if (cp == null || cp == "") { return null; } var i = cp.indexOf('/'); if (i < 0) { return cp; } return cp.substring(0, i);}
previous documentnext document
<script language=JavaScript>//JavaScript at boottom to catch correct document referencefunction sendEmail(){ var hostServer = location.hostname; documentPath=escape(getCookie("doc")); if (documentPath == null || documentPath.length == 0 || hostServer == null) return; documentURL="http://" + hostServer +"/tennessee/lpExt.dll?f=templates&eMail=Y&fn=main-h.htm&cp="+documentPath; emailTo=""; emailSubject="Michie's Legal Resource Link"; emailBody="\n\n" + documentURL; emailURL = "mailto:" + escape(emailTo) + "?subject=" + escape(emailSubject) + "&body=" + escape(emailBody); window.location = emailURL;}



Edited by rose 2007-08-29 11:07 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 11:09 AM (#66725 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

Sorry about all that computer stuff.  I could not get rid of it.  Anyway, horses are LIVESTOCK  and this is another reason to keep horses designated as LIVESTOCK.

IMO Iowa s---s

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 11:36 AM (#66731 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA

One more way that Iowa gets us is that horses aren't considered an agricultural product in Iowa, so any exemptions that apply to farmers don't apply to horse hauling. 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rattler
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 11:41 AM (#66732 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 95
252525
Location: Nashville, TN
How does Iowa intepret farm logo's posted on a trailer....does that automatically make you commericial?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 11:56 AM (#66733 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA

Farm logos don't automatically make you commercial, but they are just one more red flag that makes the DOT that much more likely to stop you.  I do know of several people that have taken off any logos off of their trailer for this very reason.

While this latest incident has happended in Iowa, there have been several articles in various magazines lately of this happening in other states also.  I don't want people to think that just because they don't drive in Iowa they should be OK, it's happening all across the country.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 12:26 PM (#66737 - in reply to #66710)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

But they are clearly interpreting the law strictly to suit their own interests.Any competent attorney would be able to look at the law,specifically 49 CFR 390.3 and see that it excludes such as yourself,me,and keepontruckin.

Part a: "The rules in SUbchapter B of this chapter are applicable to all employers,employees,and commercial motor vehicles,which transport property or passengers in interstate commerce. " Then comes the rules,bla bla bla.

Part f:"Unless otherwise specifically provided,the rules in this subchapter do not apply to---"(f3)"The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise."

Just their interpretation of  what "THEY" think is compensation or commercial doesn't make it so,and a good law firm would love to get ahold of it and tear somebody in Iowa and elsewhere a new one over it,I'm sure.It shouldn't be the responsibility of honest decent people on the road persuing a hobby whether it's hauling to a show or breeding a mare to PROVE to these arrogant little Hitlers in their perceived  places of power that they are indeed ,in all honesty,not commercial haulers.

They've found another way that they THINK they can line their coffers with and promote themselves in their public offices,also,in which they were put there in the first place by taxpayers and voters that can have them dethroned.

If you don't stand up and holler loud enough from the rooftops about something,you give everybody like this the eternal right to do the same thing over and over and over.Greed and dishonesty feed on themselves.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 12:31 PM (#66738 - in reply to #66711)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100
Originally written by rose on 2007-08-29 10:15 AM

  In the olden days, there were certain counties in certain states that always had speed traps looking for out of state plates for this reason.

We had one ourselves,not in the olden days,it was not so long ago,right here in my county in a town not far from where I-55 is picked up going to Memphis.

They did it for years and got by with it,until they got a gun slinging female in there that I believe,the story went,pulled a gun on an unsuspecting motorist that knew the right people.

No more speed trap,no more gun slinger female cop,and no more MALE speed trap cop either.There is still a speed limit there,but no one sitting there waiting on people like a spider to write them a stick it to you Arkansas style ticket for going 5mph over the speed limit.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 1:29 PM (#66741 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA
I agree with you, crowleysridgegirl,  that this should be clarified on a national scale.  But I think the strength comes in numbers, and it should be from the American Horse Council, the breed associations, the trail ride associations,  as well as from the new association of horse trailer manufacturers combining their efforts showing the number of people that this affects.  The RV industry has been very vocal and presented a united front to get the law exemptions changed on their behalf, and the horse industry needs to do the same.  And it's not just the horse industry, it's also those who pull the race car trailers and others that are in the same boat. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Yvette
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 2:19 PM (#66742 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 316
100100100
Location: Illinois
Perhaps try confusing them by putting Not For Hire on truck and trailer in big letters. If nothing else, they might not know what to do with that??

Certainly doesn't make one want to travel to Iowa anytime soon if they are looking for out-of-staters for extra revenue.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 4:15 PM (#66747 - in reply to #66741)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

Yes,you are right.Up until now,there has been little input on this matter,but,it is getting to the point where we are going to have to engage these organizations and support from government officials to prevent some of this ridiculous harassment.

Similar to the National Animal ID System,support has to come from grass roots organizations such as LibertyArk coalition so that those "powers that be" know the tax paying public isn't always going to lay down like dogs and let them run over us.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Rich M.
Reg. Sep 2005
Posted 2007-08-29 7:18 PM (#66759 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Veteran


Posts: 235
10010025
Location: Keymar,Maryland
If you are legal in your registered / licensed state ( not stretching , bending , skirting things, you know what I'm talking about) next time just say let's skip all this, stick out your wrists and say take my arse in, call a wrecker for the truck and trailer, you take care of my horses and I want to see the magistrate TODAY !. Rich.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Longrider
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 7:40 PM (#66763 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Extreme Veteran


Posts: 335
10010010025
Location: Decatur, Texas
Why not start a contact campaign with the Secretary of Transportation, Mary E. Peters, who is over the DOT and  the FMCSA?  Call, write, e-mail, etc. with all the gripes.  Let them know how unhappy we the horsepeople are with their lack of policy translation at the state levels pertaining to the laws in force.  Somewhere I can see a clerk being inundated by a superior wanting to get facts as to what is happening to the traveling public taxpayer.  Just My Thoughts.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 7:56 PM (#66765 - in reply to #66715)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Just to let you know I thought I was perfectly legal in Texas.  Everything is registered, inspected, tagged, insured the whole bit.  However, I looked up the Texas Dept of Motor Safety license dept. and discovered this. A Class A drivers license(CDL) is required for "any combination of vehicles with a GVWR of 26,001lbs or more lbs provided the GVWR of the towed vehicle is in excess of 10,000lbs.  So even though my vehicles are legal seperately, when I'm hitched up I becopme illegal.  Go figure.  A Class C drivers license can tow anything under a 10000lbs GVWR.  But what the real problem is that this is a FEDERAL issue, which overrides the states regulation.

Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-08-29 8:07 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 8:41 PM (#66774 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

Rich M.  that was kind of my thought....especially about that "brand inspection" crap

Off the topic, but I don't care to go back to S Dakota, Wyoming or Colorado...The poverty there was depressing....It was so bad it made South Memphis look affluent.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 9:09 PM (#66777 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

The following is from Chapter 50 of Title 55 of the Tennessee Code:

     (12“Commercial driver license” means a license issued by the department in accordance with the standards contained in 49 C.F.R. part 383 to an individual which authorizes the individual to operate a class of commercial motor vehicle. A commercial driver certificate accompanied by a valid driver license shall be considered a valid commercial driver license;

     (13“Commercial motor vehicle” means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle:

          (AHas a gross vehicle weight rating or gross combination weight rating of twenty-six thousand one (26,001) or more pounds;

          (BIs designed to transport more than fifteen (15) passengers, including the driver; or

          (CIs of any size and is used in the transportation of materials found to be hazardous for the purposes of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and which require the motor vehicle to be placarded;

          (DHowever, the following vehicles and groups of vehicles shall not be considered commercial motor vehicles for the purposes of this chapter:

                (iVehicles which are controlled and operated by a farmer or nurseryworker that are used to transport either agricultural products, farm machinery, or farm supplies to or from a farm or nursery, and are not used in the operations of a common or contract motor carrier and are used within one hundred fifty (150) miles of the person's farm or nursery;

                (iiVehicles designed and used solely as emergency vehicles which are necessary for the preservation of life or property or the execution of emergency governmental functions performed under emergency conditions and not subject to normal traffic regulation. This exemption shall apply to vehicles operated by paid or non-paid personnel;

                (iiiVehicles of the department of defense when operated by military personnel on active duty, members of the reserves and national guard on active duty including personnel on full-time national guard duty, personnel on part-time training and national guard military technicians or civilians who are required to wear military uniforms and who are subject to the code of military justice;

                (ivVehicles designed and used primarily as recreational vehicles as defined in this section; and

                (vVehicles leased strictly and exclusively to transport personal possessions or family members for nonbusiness purposes;

 

So Keeponhaulin' if your rig is used/designed  "primarily" as "recreational"  you would be legal in TN and I suspect the same exemption applies in TX

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
farmbabe
Reg. Nov 2003
Posted 2007-08-29 9:20 PM (#66780 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 1723
1000500100100
Location: michigan
I have traveled several states and have never pulled into a weigh station nor have I been requested to do so. I have never been pulled over for any reason ( with the trailer I mean)But this was not out west...maybe cops out yonder are bored>
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 9:31 PM (#66787 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

ok here is part of 49 CFR part 383.....you guys can print this off and carry it with you if you like...

[Code of Federal Regulations][Title 49, Volume 5][Revised as of October 1, 2006]From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access[CITE: 49CFR383][Page 183-189]                         TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION         CHAPTER III--FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION,                      DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 383_COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES--Table of Contents                             Subpart A_General                            Subpart A_GeneralSec.383.1 Purpose and scope.383.3 Applicability.383.5 Definitions.383.7 Validity of CDL issued by decertified State.                  Subpart B_Single License Requirement383.21 Number of drivers' licenses.383.23 Commercial driver's license.    Subpart C_Notification Requirements and Employer Responsibilities383.31 Notification of convictions for driver violations.383.33 Notification of driver's license suspensions.383.35 Notification of previous employment.383.37 Employer responsibilities.            Subpart D_Driver Disqualifications and Penalties383.51 Disqualification of drivers.383.52 Disqualification of drivers determined to constitute an imminent           hazard.383.53 Penalties.               Subpart E_Testing and Licensing Procedures383.71 Driver application procedures.383.72 Implied consent to alcohol testing.383.73 State procedures.383.75 Third party testing.383.77 Substitute for driving skills tests.                Subpart F_Vehicle Groups and Endorsements383.91 Commercial motor vehicle groups.383.93 Endorsements.383.95 Air brake restrictions.                 Subpart G_Required Knowledge and Skills383.110 General requirement.383.111 Required knowledge.383.113 Required skills.383.115 Requirements for double/triple trailers endorsement.383.117 Requirements for passenger endorsement.383.119 Requirements for tank vehicle endorsement.383.121 Requirements for hazardous materials endorsement.383.123 Requirements for a school bus endorsement.Appendix to Subpart G--Required Knowledge and Skills--Sample Guidelines                             Subpart H_Tests383.131 Test procedures.383.133 Testing methods.383.135 Minimum passing scores.    Subpart I_Requirement for Transportation Security Administration           approval of hazardous materials endorsement issuances383.141 General.             Subpart J_Commercial Driver's License Document383.151 General.383.153 Information on the document and application.383.155 Tamperproofing requirements.    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., 31502; sec. 214 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1766, 1767; sec. 1012(b) of Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 397; sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; and 49 CFR 1.73.    Source: 52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, unless otherwise noted.    Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 383 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.[[Page 184]]Sec.  383.1  Purpose and scope.    (a) The purpose of this part is to help reduce or prevent truck and bus accidents, fatalities, and injuries by requiring drivers to have a single commercial motor vehicle driver's license and by disqualifying drivers who operate commercial motor vehicles in an unsafe manner.    (b) This part:    (1) Prohibits a commercial motor vehicle driver from having more than one commercial motor vehicle driver's license;    (2) Requires a driver to notify the driver's current employer and the driver's State of domicile of certain convictions;    (3) Requires that a driver provide previous employment information when applying for employment as an operator of a commercial motor vehicle;    (4) Prohibits an employer from allowing a person with a suspended license to operate a commercial motor vehicle;    (5) Establishes periods of disqualification and penalties for those persons convicted of certain criminal and other offenses and serious traffic violations, or subject to any suspensions, revocations, or cancellations of certain driving privileges;    (6) Establishes testing and licensing requirements for commercial motor vehicle operators;    (7) Requires States to give knowledge and skills tests to all qualified applicants for commercial drivers' licenses which meet the Federal standard;    (8) Sets forth commercial motor vehicle groups and endorsements;    (9) Sets forth the knowledge and skills test requirements for the motor vehicle groups and endorsements;    (10) Sets forth the Federal standards for procedures, methods, and minimum passing scores for States and others to use in testing and licensing commercial motor vehicle operators; and    (11) Establishes requirements for the State issued commercial license documentation.[52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 27648, July 21, 1988; 54 FR 40787, Oct. 3, 1989]Sec.  383.3  Applicability.    (a) The rules in this part apply to every person who operates a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) in interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, to all employers of such persons, and to all States.    (b) The exceptions contained in Sec.  390.3(f) of this subchapter do not apply to this part. The employers and drivers identified in Sec.  390.3(f) must comply with the requirements of this part, unless otherwise provided in this section.    (c) Exception for certain military drivers. Each State must exempt from the requirements of this part individuals who operate CMVs for military purposes. This exception is applicable to active duty military personnel; members of the military reserves; member of the national guard on active duty, including personnel on full-time national guard duty, personnel on part-time national guard training, and national guard military technicians (civilians who are required to wear military uniforms); and active duty U.S. Coast Guard personnel. This exception is not applicable to U.S. Reserve technicians.    (d) Exception for farmers, firefighters, emergency response vehicle drivers, and drivers removing snow and ice. A State may, at its discretion, exempt individuals identified in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section from the requirements of this part. The use of this waiver is limited to the driver's home State unless there is a reciprocity agreement with adjoining States.    (1) Operators of a farm vehicle which is:    (i) Controlled and operated by a farmer, including operation by employees or family members;    (ii) Used to transport either agricultural products, farm machinery, farm supplies, or both to or from a farm;    (iii) Not used in the operations of a common or contract motor carrier; and    (iv) Used within 241 kilometers (150 miles) of the farmer's farm.    (2) Firefighters and other persons who operate CMVs which are necessary to the preservation of life or property or the execution of emergency governmental functions, are equipped with audible and visual signals and are not[[Page 185]]subject to normal traffic regulation. These vehicles include fire trucks, hook and ladder trucks, foam or water transport trucks, police SWAT team vehicles, ambulances, or other vehicles that are used in response to emergencies.    (3)(i) A driver, employed by an eligible unit of local government, operating a commercial motor vehicle within the boundaries of that unit for the purpose of removing snow or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting, if    (A) The properly licensed employee who ordinarily operates a commercial motor vehicle for these purposes is unable to operate the vehicle; or    (B) The employing governmental entity determines that a snow or ice emergency exists that requires additional assistance.    (ii) This exemption shall not preempt State laws and regulations concerning the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles.    (e) Restricted commercial drivers license (CDL) for certain drivers in the State of Alaska. (1) The State of Alaska may, at its discretion, waive only the following requirements of this part and issue a CDL to each driver that meets the conditions set forth in paragraphs (e) (2) and (3) of this section:    (i) The knowledge tests standards for testing procedures and methods of subpart H, but must continue to administer knowledge tests that fulfill the content requirements of subpart G for all applicants;    (ii) All the skills test requirements; and    (iii) The requirement under Sec.  383.153(a)(4) to have a photograph on the license document.    (2) Drivers of CMVs in the State of Alaska must operate exclusively over roads that meet both of the following criteria to be eligible for the exception in paragraph (e)(1) of this section:    (i) Such roads are not connected by land highway or vehicular way to the land-connected State highway system; and    (ii) Such roads are not connected to any highway or vehicular way with an average daily traffic volume greater than 499.    (3) Any CDL issued under the terms of this paragraph must carry two restrictions:    (i) Holders may not operate CMVs over roads other than those specified in paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and    (ii) The license is not valid for CMV operation outside the State of Alaska.    (f) Restricted CDL for certain drivers in farm-related service industries. (1) A State may, at its discretion, waive the required knowledge and skills tests of subpart H of this part and issue restricted CDLs to employees of these designated farm-related service industries:    (i) Agri-chemical businesses;    (ii) Custom harvesters;    (iii) Farm retail outlets and suppliers;    (iv) Livestock feeders.    (2) A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall meet all the requirements of this part, except subpart H of this part. A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be accorded the same reciprocity as a CDL meeting all of the requirements of this part. The restrictions imposed upon the issuance of this restricted CDL shall not limit a person's use of the CDL in a non-CMV during either validated or non-validated periods, nor shall the CDL affect a State's power to administer its driver licensing program for operators of vehicles other than CMVs.    (3) A State issuing a CDL under the terms of this paragraph must restrict issuance as follows:    (i) Applicants must have a good driving record as defined in this paragraph. Drivers who have not held any motor vehicle operator's license for at least one year shall not be eligible for this CDL. Drivers who have between one and two years of driving experience must demonstrate a good driving record for their entire driving history. Drivers with more than two years of driving experience must have a good driving record for the two most recent years. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term good driving record means that an applicant:    (A) Has not had more than one license (except in the instances specified in Sec.  383.21);[[Page 186]]    (B) Has not had any license suspended, revoked, or canceled;    (C) Has not had any conviction for any type of motor vehicle for the disqualifying offenses contained in Sec.  383.51(b);    (D) Has not had any conviction for any type of motor vehicle for serious traffic violations; and    (E) Has not had any conviction for a violation of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control (other than a parking violation) arising in connection with any traffic accident, and has no record of an accident in which he/she was at fault.    (ii) Restricted CDLs shall have the same renewal cycle as unrestricted CDLs, but shall be limited to the seasonal period or periods as defined by the State of licensure, provided that the total number of calendar days in any 12-month period for which the restricted CDL is valid does not exceed 180. If a State elects to provide for more than one seasonal period, the restricted CDL is valid for commercial motor vehicle operation only during the currently approved season, and must be revalidated for each successive season. Only one seasonal period of validity may appear on the license document at a time. The good driving record must be confirmed prior to any renewal or revalidation.    (iii) Restricted CDL holders are limited to operating Group B and C vehicles, as described in subpart F of this part.    (iv) Restricted CDLs shall not be issued with any endorsements on the license document. Only the limited tank vehicle and hazardous materials endorsement privileges that the restricted CDL automatically confers and are described in paragraph (f)(3)(v) of this section are permitted.    (v) Restricted CDL holders may not drive vehicles carrying any placardable quantities of hazardous materials, except for diesel fuel in quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less; liquid fertilizers (i.e., plant nutrients) in vehicles or implements of husbandry in total quantities of 11,355 liters (3,000 gallons) or less; and solid fertilizers (i.e., solid plant nutrients) that are not transported with any organic substance.    (vi) Restricted CDL holders may not hold an unrestricted CDL at the same time.    (vii) Restricted CDL holders may not operate a commercial motor vehicle beyond 241 kilometers (150 miles) from the place of business or the farm currently being served.    (g) Restricted CDL for certain drivers in the pyrotechnic industry. (1) A State may, at its discretion, waive the required hazardous materials knowledge tests of subpart H of this part and issue restricted CDLs to part-time drivers operating commercial motor vehicles transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives.    (2) A State issuing a CDL under the terms of this paragraph must restrict issuance as follows:    (i) The GVWR of the vehicle to be operated must be less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds);    (ii) If a State believes, at its discretion, that the training required by Sec.  172.704 of this title adequately prepares part-time drivers meeting the other requirements of this paragraph to deal with fireworks and the other potential dangers posed by fireworks transportation and use, the State may waive the hazardous materials knowledge tests of subpart H of this part. The State may impose any requirements it believes is necessary to ensure itself that a driver is properly trained pursuant to Sec.  172.704 of this title.    (iii) A restricted CDL document issued pursuant to this paragraph shall have a statement clearly imprinted on the face of the document that is substantially similar as follows: ``For use as a CDL only during the period from June 30 through July 6 for purposes of transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives in a vehicle with a GVWR of less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds).    (3) A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall meet all the requirements of this part, except those specifically identified. A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be accorded the same reciprocity[[Page 187]]as a CDL meeting all of the requirements of this part. The restrictions imposed upon the issuance of this restricted CDL shall not limit a person's use of the CDL in a non-CMV during either validated or non-validated periods, nor shall the CDL affect a State's power to administer its driver licensing program for operators of vehicles other than CMVs.    (4) Restricted CDLs shall have the same renewal cycle as unrestricted CDLs, but shall be limited to the seasonal period of June 30 through July 6 of each year or a lesser period as defined by the State of licensure.    (5) Persons who operate commercial motor vehicles during the period from July 7 through June 29 for purposes of transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives in a vehicle with a GVWR of less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds) and who also operate such vehicles for the same purposes during the period June 30 through July 6 shall not be issued a restricted CDL pursuant to this paragraph.[61 FR 9564, Mar. 8, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 14679, Apr. 3, 1996; 62 FR 1296, Jan. 9, 1997; 67 FR 49755, July 31, 2002; 67 FR 61821, Oct. 2, 2002]Sec.  383.5  Definitions.    As used in this part:    Administrator means the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator, the chief executive of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, an agency within the Department of Transportation.    Alcohol or alcoholic beverage means: (a) Beer as defined in 26 U.S.C. 5052(a), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, (b) wine of not less than one-half of one per centum of alcohol by volume, or (c) distilled spirits as defined in section 5002(a)(8), of such Code.    Alcohol concentration (AC) means the concentration of alcohol in a person's blood or breath. When expressed as a percentage it means grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.    Alien means any person not a citizen or national of the United States.    Commerce means (a) any trade, traffic or transportation within the jurisdiction of the United States between a place in a State and a place outside of such State, including a place outside of the United States and (b) trade, traffic, and transportation in the United States which affects any trade, traffic, and transportation described in paragraph (a) of this definition.    Commercial driver's license (CDL) means a license issued by a State or other jurisdiction, in accordance with the standards contained in 49 CFR part 383, to an individual which authorizes the individual to operate a class of a commercial motor vehicle.    Commercial driver's license information system (CDLIS) means the CDLIS established by FMCSA pursuant to section 12007 of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986.    Commercial motor vehicle (CMV) means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle--    (a) Has a gross combination weight rating of 11,794 kilograms or more (26,001 pounds or more) inclusive of a towed unit(s) with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds); or    (b) Has a gross vehicle weight rating of 11,794 or more kilograms (26,001 pounds or more); or    (c) Is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or    (d) Is of any size and is used in the transportation of hazardous materials as defined in this section.    Controlled substance has the meaning such term has under 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and includes all substances listed on schedules I through V of 21 CFR 1308 (Sec. Sec.  1308.11 through 1308.15), as they may be amended by the United States Department of Justice.    Conviction means an unvacated adjudication of guilt, or a determination that a person has violated or failed to comply with the law in a court of original jurisdiction or by an authorized administrative tribunal, an unvacated forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure the person's appearance in court, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere accepted by the court, the payment of a fine or court cost, or violation of a condition of release without[[Page 188]]bail, regardless of whether or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated.''    Disqualification means any of the following three actions:    (a) The suspension, revocation, or cancellation of a CDL by the State or jurisdiction of issuance.    (b) Any withdrawal of a person's privileges to drive a CMV by a State or other jurisdiction as the result of a violation of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control (other than parking, vehicle weight or vehicle defect violations).    (c) A determination by the FMCSA that a person is not qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle under part 391 of this chapter.    Driver applicant means an individual who applies to a State to obtain, transfer, upgrade, or renew a CDL.    Driver's license means a license issued by a State or other jurisdiction, to an individual which authorizes the individual to operate a motor vehicle on the highways.    Driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol means committing any one or more of the following acts in a CMV--    (a) Driving a CMV while the person's alcohol concentration is 0.04 or more;    (b) Driving under the influence of alcohol, as prescribed by State law; or    (c) Refusal to undergo such testing as is required by any State or jurisdiction in the enforcement of Sec.  383.51(b) or Sec.  392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.    Eligible unit of local government means a city, town, borough, county, parish, district, or other public body created by or pursuant to State law which has a total population of 3,000 individuals or less.    Employee means any operator of a commercial motor vehicle, including full time, regularly employed drivers; casual, intermittent or occasional drivers; leased drivers and independent, owner-operator contractors (while in the course of operating a commercial motor vehicle) who are either directly employed by or under lease to an employer.    Employer means any person (including the United States, a State, District of Columbia or a political subdivision of a State) who owns or leases a commercial motor vehicle or assigns employees to operate such a vehicle.    Endorsement means an authorization to an individual's CDL required to permit the individual to operate certain types of commercial motor vehicles.    Fatality means the death of a person as a result of a motor vehicle accident.    Felony means an offense under State or Federal law that is punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year.    Foreign means outside the fifty United States and the District of Columbia.    Gross combination weight rating (GCWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a combination (articulated) vehicle. In the absence of a value specified by the manufacturer, GCWR will be determined by adding the GVWR of the power unit and the total weight of the towed unit and any load thereon.    Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a single vehicle.    Hazardous materials means any material that has been designated as hazardous under 49 U.S.C. 5103 and is required to be placarded under subpart F of 49 CFR part 172 or any quantity of a material listed as a select agent or toxin in 42 CFR part 73.    Imminent hazard means the existence of a condition that presents a substantial likelihood that death, serious illness, severe personal injury, or a substantial endangerment to health, property, or the environment may occur before the reasonably foreseeable completion date of a formal proceeding begun to lessen the risk of that death, illness, injury or endangerment.    Motor vehicle means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power used on highways, except that such term does not include a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, semitrailer operated exclusively on a rail.    Nonresident CDL means a CDL issued by a State under either of the following two conditions:    (a) To an individual domiciled in a foreign country meeting the requirements of Sec.  383.23(b)(1).[[Page 189]]    (b) To an individual domiciled in another State meeting the requirements of Sec.  383.23(b)(2).    Non-CMV means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles not defined by the term ``commercial motor vehicle (CMV)'' in this section.    Out-of-service order means a declaration by an authorized enforcement officer of a Federal, State, Canadian, Mexican, or local jurisdiction that a driver, a commercial motor vehicle, or a motor carrier operation, is out-of-service pursuant to Sec. Sec.  386.72, 392.5, 395.13, 396.9, or compatible laws, or the North American Uniform Out-of-Service Criteria.    Representative vehicle means a motor vehicle which represents the type of motor vehicle that a driver applicant operates or expects to operate.    School bus means a CMV used to transport pre-primary, primary, or secondary school students from home to school, from school to home, or to and from school-sponsored events. School bus does not include a bus used as a common carrier.    Serious traffic violation means conviction of any of the following offenses when operating a CMV, except weight, defect and parking violations:    (a) Excessive speeding, involving any single offense for any speed of 15 miles per hour or more above the posted speed limit;    (b) Reckless driving, as defined by State or local law or regulation, including but not limited to offenses of driving a CMV in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property;    (c) Improper or erratic traffic lane changes;    (d) Following the vehicle ahead too closely;    (e) A violation, arising in connection with a fatal accident, of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control;    (f) Driving a CMV without obtaining a CDL;    (g) Driving a CMV without a CDL in the driver's possession. Any individual who provides proof to the enforcement authority that issued the citation, by the date the individual must appear in court or pay any fine for such a violation, that the individual held a valid CDL on the date the citation was issued, shall not be guilty of this offense; or    (h) Driving a CMV without the proper class of CDL and/or endorsements for the specific vehicle group being operated or for the passengers or type of cargo being transported.    State means a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.    State of domicile means that State where a person has his/her true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which he/she has the intention of returning whenever he/she is absent.    Tank vehicle means any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid or gaseous materials within a tank that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. Such vehicles include, but are not limited to, cargo tanks and portable tanks, as defined in part 171 of this title. However, this definition does not include portable tanks having a rated capacity under 1,000 gallons.    United States the term United States means the 50 States and the District of Columbia.    Vehicle means a motor vehicle unless otherwise specified.    Vehicle group means a class or type of vehicle with certain operating characteristics.[52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 27648, July 21, 1988; 53 FR 39050, Oct. 4, 1988; 54 FR 40787, Oct. 3, 1989; 59 FR 26028, May 18, 1994; 61 FR 9566, Mar. 8, 1996; 61 FR 14679, Apr. 3, 1996; 62 FR 37151, July 11, 1997; 67 FR 49756, July 31, 2002; 68 FR 23849, May 5, 2003]Sec.  383.7  Validity of CDL issued by decertified State.    A CDL issued by a State prior to the date the State is notified by the Administrator, in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  384.405 of this subchapter, that the State is prohibited from issuing CDLs, will remain valid until its stated expiration date.[67 FR 49756, July 31, 2002][[Page 190]]
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 9:33 PM (#66788 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY
[Code of Federal Regulations][Title 49, Volume 5][Revised as of October 1, 2006]From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access[CITE: 49CFR383][Page 183-189]                         TITLE 49--TRANSPORTATION         CHAPTER III--FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY ADMINISTRATION,                      DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PART 383_COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE STANDARDS; REQUIREMENTS AND PENALTIES--Table of Contents                             Subpart A_General                            Subpart A_GeneralSec.383.1 Purpose and scope.383.3 Applicability.383.5 Definitions.383.7 Validity of CDL issued by decertified State.                  Subpart B_Single License Requirement383.21 Number of drivers' licenses.383.23 Commercial driver's license.    Subpart C_Notification Requirements and Employer Responsibilities383.31 Notification of convictions for driver violations.383.33 Notification of driver's license suspensions.383.35 Notification of previous employment.383.37 Employer responsibilities.            Subpart D_Driver Disqualifications and Penalties383.51 Disqualification of drivers.383.52 Disqualification of drivers determined to constitute an imminent           hazard.383.53 Penalties.               Subpart E_Testing and Licensing Procedures383.71 Driver application procedures.383.72 Implied consent to alcohol testing.383.73 State procedures.383.75 Third party testing.383.77 Substitute for driving skills tests.                Subpart F_Vehicle Groups and Endorsements383.91 Commercial motor vehicle groups.383.93 Endorsements.383.95 Air brake restrictions.                 Subpart G_Required Knowledge and Skills383.110 General requirement.383.111 Required knowledge.383.113 Required skills.383.115 Requirements for double/triple trailers endorsement.383.117 Requirements for passenger endorsement.383.119 Requirements for tank vehicle endorsement.383.121 Requirements for hazardous materials endorsement.383.123 Requirements for a school bus endorsement.Appendix to Subpart G--Required Knowledge and Skills--Sample Guidelines                             Subpart H_Tests383.131 Test procedures.383.133 Testing methods.383.135 Minimum passing scores.    Subpart I_Requirement for Transportation Security Administration           approval of hazardous materials endorsement issuances383.141 General.             Subpart J_Commercial Driver's License Document383.151 General.383.153 Information on the document and application.383.155 Tamperproofing requirements.    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 521, 31136, 31301 et seq., 31502; sec. 214 of Pub. L. 106-159, 113 Stat. 1766, 1767; sec. 1012(b) of Pub. L. 107-56, 115 Stat. 397; sec. 4140 of Pub. L. 109-59, 119 Stat. 1144; and 49 CFR 1.73.    Source: 52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, unless otherwise noted.    Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 383 appear at 66 FR 49872, Oct. 1, 2001.[[Page 184]]Sec.  383.1  Purpose and scope.    (a) The purpose of this part is to help reduce or prevent truck and bus accidents, fatalities, and injuries by requiring drivers to have a single commercial motor vehicle driver's license and by disqualifying drivers who operate commercial motor vehicles in an unsafe manner.    (b) This part:    (1) Prohibits a commercial motor vehicle driver from having more than one commercial motor vehicle driver's license;    (2) Requires a driver to notify the driver's current employer and the driver's State of domicile of certain convictions;    (3) Requires that a driver provide previous employment information when applying for employment as an operator of a commercial motor vehicle;    (4) Prohibits an employer from allowing a person with a suspended license to operate a commercial motor vehicle;    (5) Establishes periods of disqualification and penalties for those persons convicted of certain criminal and other offenses and serious traffic violations, or subject to any suspensions, revocations, or cancellations of certain driving privileges;    (6) Establishes testing and licensing requirements for commercial motor vehicle operators;    (7) Requires States to give knowledge and skills tests to all qualified applicants for commercial drivers' licenses which meet the Federal standard;    (8) Sets forth commercial motor vehicle groups and endorsements;    (9) Sets forth the knowledge and skills test requirements for the motor vehicle groups and endorsements;    (10) Sets forth the Federal standards for procedures, methods, and minimum passing scores for States and others to use in testing and licensing commercial motor vehicle operators; and    (11) Establishes requirements for the State issued commercial license documentation.[52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 27648, July 21, 1988; 54 FR 40787, Oct. 3, 1989]Sec.  383.3  Applicability.    (a) The rules in this part apply to every person who operates a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) in interstate, foreign, or intrastate commerce, to all employers of such persons, and to all States.    (b) The exceptions contained in Sec.  390.3(f) of this subchapter do not apply to this part. The employers and drivers identified in Sec.  390.3(f) must comply with the requirements of this part, unless otherwise provided in this section.    (c) Exception for certain military drivers. Each State must exempt from the requirements of this part individuals who operate CMVs for military purposes. This exception is applicable to active duty military personnel; members of the military reserves; member of the national guard on active duty, including personnel on full-time national guard duty, personnel on part-time national guard training, and national guard military technicians (civilians who are required to wear military uniforms); and active duty U.S. Coast Guard personnel. This exception is not applicable to U.S. Reserve technicians.    (d) Exception for farmers, firefighters, emergency response vehicle drivers, and drivers removing snow and ice. A State may, at its discretion, exempt individuals identified in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of this section from the requirements of this part. The use of this waiver is limited to the driver's home State unless there is a reciprocity agreement with adjoining States.    (1) Operators of a farm vehicle which is:    (i) Controlled and operated by a farmer, including operation by employees or family members;    (ii) Used to transport either agricultural products, farm machinery, farm supplies, or both to or from a farm;    (iii) Not used in the operations of a common or contract motor carrier; and    (iv) Used within 241 kilometers (150 miles) of the farmer's farm.    (2) Firefighters and other persons who operate CMVs which are necessary to the preservation of life or property or the execution of emergency governmental functions, are equipped with audible and visual signals and are not[[Page 185]]subject to normal traffic regulation. These vehicles include fire trucks, hook and ladder trucks, foam or water transport trucks, police SWAT team vehicles, ambulances, or other vehicles that are used in response to emergencies.    (3)(i) A driver, employed by an eligible unit of local government, operating a commercial motor vehicle within the boundaries of that unit for the purpose of removing snow or ice from a roadway by plowing, sanding, or salting, if    (A) The properly licensed employee who ordinarily operates a commercial motor vehicle for these purposes is unable to operate the vehicle; or    (B) The employing governmental entity determines that a snow or ice emergency exists that requires additional assistance.    (ii) This exemption shall not preempt State laws and regulations concerning the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles.    (e) Restricted commercial drivers license (CDL) for certain drivers in the State of Alaska. (1) The State of Alaska may, at its discretion, waive only the following requirements of this part and issue a CDL to each driver that meets the conditions set forth in paragraphs (e) (2) and (3) of this section:    (i) The knowledge tests standards for testing procedures and methods of subpart H, but must continue to administer knowledge tests that fulfill the content requirements of subpart G for all applicants;    (ii) All the skills test requirements; and    (iii) The requirement under Sec.  383.153(a)(4) to have a photograph on the license document.    (2) Drivers of CMVs in the State of Alaska must operate exclusively over roads that meet both of the following criteria to be eligible for the exception in paragraph (e)(1) of this section:    (i) Such roads are not connected by land highway or vehicular way to the land-connected State highway system; and    (ii) Such roads are not connected to any highway or vehicular way with an average daily traffic volume greater than 499.    (3) Any CDL issued under the terms of this paragraph must carry two restrictions:    (i) Holders may not operate CMVs over roads other than those specified in paragraph (e)(2) of this section; and    (ii) The license is not valid for CMV operation outside the State of Alaska.    (f) Restricted CDL for certain drivers in farm-related service industries. (1) A State may, at its discretion, waive the required knowledge and skills tests of subpart H of this part and issue restricted CDLs to employees of these designated farm-related service industries:    (i) Agri-chemical businesses;    (ii) Custom harvesters;    (iii) Farm retail outlets and suppliers;    (iv) Livestock feeders.    (2) A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall meet all the requirements of this part, except subpart H of this part. A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be accorded the same reciprocity as a CDL meeting all of the requirements of this part. The restrictions imposed upon the issuance of this restricted CDL shall not limit a person's use of the CDL in a non-CMV during either validated or non-validated periods, nor shall the CDL affect a State's power to administer its driver licensing program for operators of vehicles other than CMVs.    (3) A State issuing a CDL under the terms of this paragraph must restrict issuance as follows:    (i) Applicants must have a good driving record as defined in this paragraph. Drivers who have not held any motor vehicle operator's license for at least one year shall not be eligible for this CDL. Drivers who have between one and two years of driving experience must demonstrate a good driving record for their entire driving history. Drivers with more than two years of driving experience must have a good driving record for the two most recent years. For the purposes of this paragraph, the term good driving record means that an applicant:    (A) Has not had more than one license (except in the instances specified in Sec.  383.21);[[Page 186]]    (B) Has not had any license suspended, revoked, or canceled;    (C) Has not had any conviction for any type of motor vehicle for the disqualifying offenses contained in Sec.  383.51(b);    (D) Has not had any conviction for any type of motor vehicle for serious traffic violations; and    (E) Has not had any conviction for a violation of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control (other than a parking violation) arising in connection with any traffic accident, and has no record of an accident in which he/she was at fault.    (ii) Restricted CDLs shall have the same renewal cycle as unrestricted CDLs, but shall be limited to the seasonal period or periods as defined by the State of licensure, provided that the total number of calendar days in any 12-month period for which the restricted CDL is valid does not exceed 180. If a State elects to provide for more than one seasonal period, the restricted CDL is valid for commercial motor vehicle operation only during the currently approved season, and must be revalidated for each successive season. Only one seasonal period of validity may appear on the license document at a time. The good driving record must be confirmed prior to any renewal or revalidation.    (iii) Restricted CDL holders are limited to operating Group B and C vehicles, as described in subpart F of this part.    (iv) Restricted CDLs shall not be issued with any endorsements on the license document. Only the limited tank vehicle and hazardous materials endorsement privileges that the restricted CDL automatically confers and are described in paragraph (f)(3)(v) of this section are permitted.    (v) Restricted CDL holders may not drive vehicles carrying any placardable quantities of hazardous materials, except for diesel fuel in quantities of 3,785 liters (1,000 gallons) or less; liquid fertilizers (i.e., plant nutrients) in vehicles or implements of husbandry in total quantities of 11,355 liters (3,000 gallons) or less; and solid fertilizers (i.e., solid plant nutrients) that are not transported with any organic substance.    (vi) Restricted CDL holders may not hold an unrestricted CDL at the same time.    (vii) Restricted CDL holders may not operate a commercial motor vehicle beyond 241 kilometers (150 miles) from the place of business or the farm currently being served.    (g) Restricted CDL for certain drivers in the pyrotechnic industry. (1) A State may, at its discretion, waive the required hazardous materials knowledge tests of subpart H of this part and issue restricted CDLs to part-time drivers operating commercial motor vehicles transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives.    (2) A State issuing a CDL under the terms of this paragraph must restrict issuance as follows:    (i) The GVWR of the vehicle to be operated must be less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds);    (ii) If a State believes, at its discretion, that the training required by Sec.  172.704 of this title adequately prepares part-time drivers meeting the other requirements of this paragraph to deal with fireworks and the other potential dangers posed by fireworks transportation and use, the State may waive the hazardous materials knowledge tests of subpart H of this part. The State may impose any requirements it believes is necessary to ensure itself that a driver is properly trained pursuant to Sec.  172.704 of this title.    (iii) A restricted CDL document issued pursuant to this paragraph shall have a statement clearly imprinted on the face of the document that is substantially similar as follows: ``For use as a CDL only during the period from June 30 through July 6 for purposes of transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives in a vehicle with a GVWR of less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds).    (3) A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall meet all the requirements of this part, except those specifically identified. A restricted CDL issued pursuant to this paragraph shall be accorded the same reciprocity[[Page 187]]as a CDL meeting all of the requirements of this part. The restrictions imposed upon the issuance of this restricted CDL shall not limit a person's use of the CDL in a non-CMV during either validated or non-validated periods, nor shall the CDL affect a State's power to administer its driver licensing program for operators of vehicles other than CMVs.    (4) Restricted CDLs shall have the same renewal cycle as unrestricted CDLs, but shall be limited to the seasonal period of June 30 through July 6 of each year or a lesser period as defined by the State of licensure.    (5) Persons who operate commercial motor vehicles during the period from July 7 through June 29 for purposes of transporting less than 227 kilograms (500 pounds) of fireworks classified as DOT Class 1.3G explosives in a vehicle with a GVWR of less than 4,537 kilograms (10,001 pounds) and who also operate such vehicles for the same purposes during the period June 30 through July 6 shall not be issued a restricted CDL pursuant to this paragraph.[61 FR 9564, Mar. 8, 1996, as amended at 61 FR 14679, Apr. 3, 1996; 62 FR 1296, Jan. 9, 1997; 67 FR 49755, July 31, 2002; 67 FR 61821, Oct. 2, 2002]Sec.  383.5  Definitions.    As used in this part:    Administrator means the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator, the chief executive of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, an agency within the Department of Transportation.    Alcohol or alcoholic beverage means: (a) Beer as defined in 26 U.S.C. 5052(a), of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, (b) wine of not less than one-half of one per centum of alcohol by volume, or (c) distilled spirits as defined in section 5002(a)(8), of such Code.    Alcohol concentration (AC) means the concentration of alcohol in a person's blood or breath. When expressed as a percentage it means grams of alcohol per 100 milliliters of blood or grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath.    Alien means any person not a citizen or national of the United States.    Commerce means (a) any trade, traffic or transportation within the jurisdiction of the United States between a place in a State and a place outside of such State, including a place outside of the United States and (b) trade, traffic, and transportation in the United States which affects any trade, traffic, and transportation described in paragraph (a) of this definition.    Commercial driver's license (CDL) means a license issued by a State or other jurisdiction, in accordance with the standards contained in 49 CFR part 383, to an individual which authorizes the individual to operate a class of a commercial motor vehicle.    Commercial driver's license information system (CDLIS) means the CDLIS established by FMCSA pursuant to section 12007 of the Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986.    Commercial motor vehicle (CMV) means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle--    (a) Has a gross combination weight rating of 11,794 kilograms or more (26,001 pounds or more) inclusive of a towed unit(s) with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 4,536 kilograms (10,000 pounds); or    (b) Has a gross vehicle weight rating of 11,794 or more kilograms (26,001 pounds or more); or    (c) Is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or    (d) Is of any size and is used in the transportation of hazardous materials as defined in this section.    Controlled substance has the meaning such term has under 21 U.S.C. 802(6) and includes all substances listed on schedules I through V of 21 CFR 1308 (Sec. Sec.  1308.11 through 1308.15), as they may be amended by the United States Department of Justice.    Conviction means an unvacated adjudication of guilt, or a determination that a person has violated or failed to comply with the law in a court of original jurisdiction or by an authorized administrative tribunal, an unvacated forfeiture of bail or collateral deposited to secure the person's appearance in court, a plea of guilty or nolo contendere accepted by the court, the payment of a fine or court cost, or violation of a condition of release without[[Page 188]]bail, regardless of whether or not the penalty is rebated, suspended, or probated.''    Disqualification means any of the following three actions:    (a) The suspension, revocation, or cancellation of a CDL by the State or jurisdiction of issuance.    (b) Any withdrawal of a person's privileges to drive a CMV by a State or other jurisdiction as the result of a violation of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control (other than parking, vehicle weight or vehicle defect violations).    (c) A determination by the FMCSA that a person is not qualified to operate a commercial motor vehicle under part 391 of this chapter.    Driver applicant means an individual who applies to a State to obtain, transfer, upgrade, or renew a CDL.    Driver's license means a license issued by a State or other jurisdiction, to an individual which authorizes the individual to operate a motor vehicle on the highways.    Driving a commercial motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol means committing any one or more of the following acts in a CMV--    (a) Driving a CMV while the person's alcohol concentration is 0.04 or more;    (b) Driving under the influence of alcohol, as prescribed by State law; or    (c) Refusal to undergo such testing as is required by any State or jurisdiction in the enforcement of Sec.  383.51(b) or Sec.  392.5(a)(2) of this subchapter.    Eligible unit of local government means a city, town, borough, county, parish, district, or other public body created by or pursuant to State law which has a total population of 3,000 individuals or less.    Employee means any operator of a commercial motor vehicle, including full time, regularly employed drivers; casual, intermittent or occasional drivers; leased drivers and independent, owner-operator contractors (while in the course of operating a commercial motor vehicle) who are either directly employed by or under lease to an employer.    Employer means any person (including the United States, a State, District of Columbia or a political subdivision of a State) who owns or leases a commercial motor vehicle or assigns employees to operate such a vehicle.    Endorsement means an authorization to an individual's CDL required to permit the individual to operate certain types of commercial motor vehicles.    Fatality means the death of a person as a result of a motor vehicle accident.    Felony means an offense under State or Federal law that is punishable by death or imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year.    Foreign means outside the fifty United States and the District of Columbia.    Gross combination weight rating (GCWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a combination (articulated) vehicle. In the absence of a value specified by the manufacturer, GCWR will be determined by adding the GVWR of the power unit and the total weight of the towed unit and any load thereon.    Gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a single vehicle.    Hazardous materials means any material that has been designated as hazardous under 49 U.S.C. 5103 and is required to be placarded under subpart F of 49 CFR part 172 or any quantity of a material listed as a select agent or toxin in 42 CFR part 73.    Imminent hazard means the existence of a condition that presents a substantial likelihood that death, serious illness, severe personal injury, or a substantial endangerment to health, property, or the environment may occur before the reasonably foreseeable completion date of a formal proceeding begun to lessen the risk of that death, illness, injury or endangerment.    Motor vehicle means a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, or semitrailer propelled or drawn by mechanical power used on highways, except that such term does not include a vehicle, machine, tractor, trailer, semitrailer operated exclusively on a rail.    Nonresident CDL means a CDL issued by a State under either of the following two conditions:    (a) To an individual domiciled in a foreign country meeting the requirements of Sec.  383.23(b)(1).[[Page 189]]    (b) To an individual domiciled in another State meeting the requirements of Sec.  383.23(b)(2).    Non-CMV means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles not defined by the term ``commercial motor vehicle (CMV)'' in this section.    Out-of-service order means a declaration by an authorized enforcement officer of a Federal, State, Canadian, Mexican, or local jurisdiction that a driver, a commercial motor vehicle, or a motor carrier operation, is out-of-service pursuant to Sec. Sec.  386.72, 392.5, 395.13, 396.9, or compatible laws, or the North American Uniform Out-of-Service Criteria.    Representative vehicle means a motor vehicle which represents the type of motor vehicle that a driver applicant operates or expects to operate.    School bus means a CMV used to transport pre-primary, primary, or secondary school students from home to school, from school to home, or to and from school-sponsored events. School bus does not include a bus used as a common carrier.    Serious traffic violation means conviction of any of the following offenses when operating a CMV, except weight, defect and parking violations:    (a) Excessive speeding, involving any single offense for any speed of 15 miles per hour or more above the posted speed limit;    (b) Reckless driving, as defined by State or local law or regulation, including but not limited to offenses of driving a CMV in willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property;    (c) Improper or erratic traffic lane changes;    (d) Following the vehicle ahead too closely;    (e) A violation, arising in connection with a fatal accident, of State or local law relating to motor vehicle traffic control;    (f) Driving a CMV without obtaining a CDL;    (g) Driving a CMV without a CDL in the driver's possession. Any individual who provides proof to the enforcement authority that issued the citation, by the date the individual must appear in court or pay any fine for such a violation, that the individual held a valid CDL on the date the citation was issued, shall not be guilty of this offense; or    (h) Driving a CMV without the proper class of CDL and/or endorsements for the specific vehicle group being operated or for the passengers or type of cargo being transported.    State means a State of the United States and the District of Columbia.    State of domicile means that State where a person has his/her true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which he/she has the intention of returning whenever he/she is absent.    Tank vehicle means any commercial motor vehicle that is designed to transport any liquid or gaseous materials within a tank that is either permanently or temporarily attached to the vehicle or the chassis. Such vehicles include, but are not limited to, cargo tanks and portable tanks, as defined in part 171 of this title. However, this definition does not include portable tanks having a rated capacity under 1,000 gallons.    United States the term United States means the 50 States and the District of Columbia.    Vehicle means a motor vehicle unless otherwise specified.    Vehicle group means a class or type of vehicle with certain operating characteristics.[52 FR 20587, June 1, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 27648, July 21, 1988; 53 FR 39050, Oct. 4, 1988; 54 FR 40787, Oct. 3, 1989; 59 FR 26028, May 18, 1994; 61 FR 9566, Mar. 8, 1996; 61 FR 14679, Apr. 3, 1996; 62 FR 37151, July 11, 1997; 67 FR 49756, July 31, 2002; 68 FR 23849, May 5, 2003]Sec.  383.7  Validity of CDL issued by decertified State.    A CDL issued by a State prior to the date the State is notified by the Administrator, in accordance with the provisions of Sec.  384.405 of this subchapter, that the State is prohibited from issuing CDLs, will remain valid until its stated expiration date.[67 FR 49756, July 31, 2002][[Page 190]]
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 9:36 PM (#66789 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

well I guess it just won't paste.....maybe it is too long....don't know....if anyone wants it pm me with your email address and I will send it to you.

Has anyone contacted US Rider about this situation?   Would they be able to help?

Personally I haven't lost anything in Iowa and plan to avoid it like the plague

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
bobtaildog
Reg. Mar 2004
Posted 2007-08-29 9:42 PM (#66791 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 71
2525
Location: Franklin, TN
I have a trip planned in the near future to South Dakota. Based on this string, I will go from Missouri to Nebraska to S. Dakota....eliminating the I-29 stretch from Missouri to Sioux City. I'm not over the limit or illegal in any way but once they pull you over...you're at their mercy. Funny they don't seem to be interested in health certificates for the animals...just rig violations.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
memory
Reg. Jul 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 10:06 PM (#66793 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Veteran


Posts: 153
1002525
Location: Iowa

I am from Iowa, and I know there has been a lot of talk of people warning people about this crack down on the rules.

I still have a couple of questions: I am under the weight. Do I still need to stop at the scales and do I need a d.o.t. number on my truck.

I have been told that if you have been stopped, say that you are going trail riding, If your child is showing is that considered commercial since you the parent are driving?

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
loveduffy
Reg. Feb 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 10:40 PM (#66796 - in reply to #66793)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Expert


Posts: 1871
10005001001001002525
Location: NY

I as told and have a paper fro the d.o.t. in Washington D.C. that  says that if you are NOT making money with your truck and trailer and using if for recreation you do not need a d.o.t. number  

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-29 10:43 PM (#66798 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Here is another twist on the whole thing.  According to the FMCSA transporting a horse to a show, the trainer, to be bred, a race etc. is considered "intent to profit".  Therefore making you a commercial vehicle.  Even if you don't make any money. I have also heard the only way around that is to say you are going to/from a trail ride. 

I am going to try to get a website up and running very soon.  I will keep everyone posted.  Thank you all so much for responding.  In the meantime I am going to be sending emails to all the horse associations, publications, trailer manufactures and transportation officials.  I encourage you all to do the same.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Too L Ranch
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-08-29 11:12 PM (#66801 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 70
2525
Location: Northern, CA
Sorry you had all the problems. Yes, it is a hassle, and yes, the fines are huge. But, it's just, unfortunately, a part of driving a truck/trailer. The sad thing is that most people are unaware of the laws, until they get pulled over. We used to use the farm exclusion clause, which states if you are within 150 miles of your base, you are legal. On occasion, we used the argument that our base was another one of our ranch properties, not the home ranch. It flew, but we knew we were treading on thin ice. Decided we might as well get legal. We haul interstate quite a bit, and do get stopped. In researching the law, we discovered that we needed to keep total weight below 26,000lbs and the tow vehicle below 10,000lbs, and trailer not more than 15,000lbs (no it doesn't add up, but thems the rules). Under those guidelines we still are required to have a trailer endorsement on our licenses. The endorsement requires taking the commercial test, but no medical papers rqd, and no increase in licensing fees. That done, we are legal to haul in any state, because we are legal in ours. Since we did that I have been stopped out of state. Upon presenting all the appropriate paperwork (coggins/health papers, brand inspection , and license with trailer endorsement) the highway patrolman thanked me for having everything in order and complimented me for having the correct license. In our state (CA), the same endorsement is required by the RVers. So, the state is not picking on the horse people, the same rules apply to everyone.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 12:17 AM (#66817 - in reply to #66774)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont
Originally written by rose on 2007-08-29 9:41 PM

Rich M.  that was kind of my thought....especially about that "brand inspection" crap

Off the topic, but I don't care to go back to S Dakota, Wyoming or Colorado...The poverty there was depressing....It was so bad it made South Memphis look affluent.

The west has this because rustling still occurs out there!!!

These are the rules from North Dakota...

36-09-23. Removal of livestock from state - Brand inspection - Penalty.
1. No person may remove cattle, horses, or mules from this state or to within a mile [1.61 kilometers] of any boundary of the state for the purpose of removal unless the livestock has been inspected for marks and brands by an official brand inspector of the North Dakota stockmen's association and a certificate of inspection must accompany the livestock to destination.
2. It is unlawful for the owner or possessor to remove any livestock from any place of regular official brand inspection unless and until official brand inspection has been made and the brand inspection certificate issued.
3. A person who violates this section is guilty of a class B misdemeanor. A person who violates this section a second time within fifteen years or violates this section three or more times is guilty of a class C felony.

It gets better...

36-09-24. Police powers of chief brand inspector and two fieldmen. The chief brand inspector and two fieldmen employed by the North Dakota stockmen's association have the power:
1. Of a police officer for the purpose of enforcing brand laws and any other state laws or rules relating to livestock.
2. To make arrests upon view and without warrant for any violation of this chapter or any other state laws or rules relating to livestock committed in the inspector's presence.
3. To respond to requests from other law enforcement agencies or officers for aid and assistance. For the purposes of this subsection, a request from a law enforcement agency or officer means only a request for assistance to a particular and single violation or suspicion of violation of law, and does not constitute a continuous request for assistance.

And people wonder why they have to carry complete paperwork on every horse they transport...

I didn't find anything related to complete cavity searches...but I'm sure they are coming...

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-30 12:23 AM (#66818 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

Has something happened to this page? Maybe it's just on my computer.I can't read all of the posts,they go on forever right off the edge!

None of the other threads I look at are like this.???

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 12:28 AM (#66819 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont

Keeponhaulin' the following would be your defence...unless you had big logos on your truck and trailer...

Recreational Vehicles

Drivers of recreational vehicles used for personal or family purposes may also

qualify for an exception to the commercial driver’s license, provided all of the

following conditions are met.

• the vehicle is not used for any commercial purpose; and

• the power unit towing a travel trailer or fifth-wheel travel trailer has a

GVWR of 26,000 pounds or less.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 12:37 AM (#66820 - in reply to #66818)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont
Originally written by crowleysridgegirl on 2007-08-30 1:23 AM

Has something happened to this page? Maybe it's just on my computer.I can't read all of the posts,they go on forever right off the edge!

None of the other threads I look at are like this.???

I think it started with Rose's message on the first page with all the javascript gobbly-gook in it...(that's high level computer talk)...

If you look at the bottom of your screen you will see a drawbar...so you can pull it to the right to see the complete messages...

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
headhunter
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 9:01 AM (#66829 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Elite Veteran


Posts: 736
50010010025
Location: Western WA
I would think complaining to the Iowa Chamber of Tourism and Iowa Chamber of Commerce might be effective.  They want to encourage travel, traffic, and spending in their state. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 11:14 AM (#66836 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
I sure would like to reply to this e-mail. You were stopped and inspected because you fall under the Federal DOT requirements. Let me try and explain- you were traveling to a horse shoe so you could try and win money and prizes. This would then make the horses that you raise, train and sell more valuable making this trip a part of your business. This was not just a simple "lets go for a horse ride with friends" but this was a business venture to ultimately make you money. You were only on the side of the road (both of you) for less than an hour and due to the heat, you were allowed to continue on. The 1st gentleman stated that he used to have a semi but didn't want to pay the fees/permits required so these types of vehicles were purchased. Last but not least, their was no road block put up for horse trailers. I don't know where people come up with this stuff...
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 11:57 AM (#66838 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Dear Rick,  You seem to know alot about the situation for someone who was not there.  I don't suppose you are officer 394?  Also, I am an amateur not a professional according to the USEF card I carry. I am not a business nor do I advertise, I have no farm name and as most who show I spend more doing that than I would ever make.  It is a very expensive recreational hobby.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
retento
Reg. Aug 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 12:11 PM (#66839 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3802
20001000500100100100
Location: Rocky Mount N.C.
How did this page get to be 18' wide? Ya'll need to bunch up your posts!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 12:53 PM (#66841 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

ok I'll bite....How the h--l did officer 394 know where a rig was going or where it had been PRIOR to the stop?

Is this part of the new warrantless wiretapping?  Since when did horsepeople become terrorists?

POOP on IOWA

I too am curious about the source of Rick's information

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 12:58 PM (#66842 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

for PaulChristenson

The brand inspector who refused to come in S Dakota admitted to us that only 2 horses had been reported stolen in the previous two years

Besides, what would a thief do with a stolen horse?  The killers aren't buying and the recreational horse market is in the basement.  Thieves, while maybe not the smartest people around, usually only steal stuff they can quickly convert into cash.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 1:19 PM (#66844 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
Hey all -
Rick here. The post under my name with all the 'inside' information was added to the thread by someone who was there and wanted to respond. I wasn't there and I don't personally know anything about the situation. I live in Iowa, drive an F350 and pull a LQ trailer, and I don't have a Class A license and don't believe I need one. Apparently the federal regulation has to do with hauling horses for profit, but who decides what constitutes profit is anybody's guess....from what I'm reading about the mess, I'm so relieved that I just trail ride!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
ROPE14U
Reg. Mar 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 1:34 PM (#66851 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 12

Location: Sanhills, Nebraska
And the plot thickens!!!!!!!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
headhunter
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 2:28 PM (#66852 - in reply to #66844)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Elite Veteran


Posts: 736
50010010025
Location: Western WA

So you are ok with someone hijacking your user name to post something you don't agree with?  How about you tell us what you do know about this anonymous poster - how did he/she come to have the information shared?

 

Originally written by rick on 2007-08-30 11:19 AM

Hey all - Rick here. The post under my name with all the 'inside' information was added to the thread by someone who was there and wanted to respond. I wasn't there and I don't personally know anything about the situation. I live in Iowa, drive an F350 and pull a LQ trailer, and I don't have a Class A license and don't believe I need one. Apparently the federal regulation has to do with hauling horses for profit, but who decides what constitutes profit is anybody's guess....from what I'm reading about the mess, I'm so relieved that I just trail ride!
 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-30 2:42 PM (#66854 - in reply to #66852)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
I forwarded the original post to this person because he was familiar with the situation and he asked if he could use my log on to reply and I gave him permission to do so. For whatever reason, he didn't identify himself when he posted; if he wants to post again and fill you guys in, so be it, but I'm staying out of it from now on. All I know is that I hope that I never get stopped while hauling horses because my wife is so protective of them she would freak out if they had to stand in the heat while we were getting our tickets! Rick 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-30 4:27 PM (#66862 - in reply to #66854)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100
I would not only freak out over my horses having to wait in the heat,but,freak out over what I perceive to be unfair and harassing and twisting/tweaking of a law that was designed for truck drivers/ freight haulers and clearly people hauling for commercial purposes.Not folks going down the road pulling a horse trailer with some horses they like to ride in the back.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-30 4:37 PM (#66864 - in reply to #66862)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

I wonder how officers of the law of the highway could construe that you would be hauling for profit if you were taking a mare to be bred? We've kept most of the colts that we have ever bred our mare for,and if we did sell one,h---,4-5 years down the road after it's born,do they even remember that particular incident? Doubtful.

Are they possibly trying to catch haulers for profit that have bought regular rigs to get around having to go through all the proper channels?

"I don't know where people come up with this stuff" Quote

H----- YAH! DITTO! You mean like government agents that don't have enough to do to justify their jobs so they make up stuff? THOSE kinds of people?????

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 4:41 PM (#66865 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont

4.   Horse Trailer World reserves the right to reveal your identity (or whatever information we know) in the event of a complaint or legal action arising from any message posted by you. 

According to the rules of this website...can I ask who posted under Rick's account?

Or do we have to complain first???....

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Broken Bit
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-30 8:22 PM (#66874 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Veteran


Posts: 246
10010025
Location: Northern IN.
Oh, c'mon Paul, do we really have to ask?  It's clear as crystal to all of us, there were only a few people there at this little "pow-wow" on the side of the highway, and I dare say that keeponhaulin' didn't post under ricks name.  This whole ordeal is just a crock of crap, and who gave this super-trooper the right to decide weather or not this is a hobby, like was already stated, he had no idea where they were coming from or where they were going when he made the stop.  They weren't speeding, they didn't have a busted windshield, they weren't doing anything other than pullin' their beloved partners (their horses) somewhere to spend some time with them.  What the hell.... a "knowledgeable employee" of the IN. D.O.T. told me personaly that if they have it thier way every mom or dad that hauls the backyard pony to 4-H practice once a week will have to have everything that us professional truck drivers do, yup D.O.T. physicals, C.D.L's, vehicle inspections and all!  Now that is going way beyond the whole commercial, makein' money, for hire or not for hire, tax deductions or not, business or hobby arguement.  Oh boy, this is a real hot spot for me, realy gets my blood boilin'.  Ya know, it's not gonna be long till there's checkpoints at all the state borders and we will have to have permits and get little booklets stamped when we enter or leave the state.  Then we can all call each other "comrad"!  Then for "him" to come on here and try to justify what he did and is probably still doing every day of the week........ grrrr.  Ah hell, I'd better go get a drink and calm down, talk to y'all later...
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 9:14 PM (#66881 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Hey Y'all, I really appreciate all of your input and enthusiasm on this issue.  It's going to take all us getting together to do something about these regulations.  I am sending out emails to all the organizations I can think of.  If you would like to be included please email me at my address and I will stick you on my list.  Also, you will then have all the email addresses I have and can send your own emails.  I believe the more emails we can get in the better.  I am also working on a website so it will be easier to access information, but I don't know how soon I will have that up and running.  Please, let me know if I have left out an organization or if you have any ideas.

Here is the email address   keeponhaulin@yahoo.com



Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-08-30 9:19 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
ROPE14U
Reg. Mar 2007
Posted 2007-08-30 9:54 PM (#66884 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 12

Location: Sanhills, Nebraska
So I am supposedly adding value to my horses by hauling them to a roping??  Well guess what.........that would only apply should I sell them.  I have yet to sell one of them.  This is a crock and I guess should I be pulled over hauling to a roping in Iowa I will be heading trail riding in the Loess Hills.  Another thing.....don't you have to have probable cause to pull someone over??  I know in Nebraska you do.  I pulled into the weigh station just outside of Nebraska City this summer after just leaving Iowa.  I wondered if I even needed to so I went in and asked the trooper if I indeed needed to pull in.  He said I did, thanked me for stopping and told me to have a nice day.  He even gave me my weights as I was pulling a new trailer and wondered what my loaded weight was. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-30 10:21 PM (#66886 - in reply to #66884)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

We pulled into one up in Missouri one time right after we got our LQ trailer.We thought maybe we should,we didn't know.THe guys in the weigh station looked at us,and called out "Something the matter?" We shook our heads,and one came out,and said,"What are you doing?" We said,"We thought we were supposed to stop here." He said,"Hell,lady,youall don't belong in here,this is for truckers and over the road haulers! Now go on,and have a nice trip,there's folks waiting in line behind you!"

We felt like a couple of dummies.I've NEVER seen a horse trailer sitting at a weigh station since.I see them fly by them in Missouri Arkansas (when you can find one) ect.and never stop.We're not stopping at the next one,either.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-31 8:19 AM (#66895 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA
Rope14u, since you are going to a roping, you have a chance to win money, which means you are participating in commerce (that's the DOT's definition, not mine), therefore you would fall under the regulations of needing a CDL and all of the other regulations that go along with that.

In Iowa, the signs by the weigh stations say all vehicles over 10,000 lbs must weigh. When I asked the officer of the DOT who spoke at the Iowa horse fair about this, he said they want you to pull in, and most of the time, they will then wave you on through. However, you can be fined if you don't stop. I noticed at the weigh scales in Nebraska, it states on the signs that all pickups with livestock trailers must weigh, but then it states that recreational vehicles are exempt.

If you do a search on here regarding CDL, you'll notice that this issue isn't new, it seems to resurface about every 6 months or so.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
inWA
Reg. Mar 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 8:36 AM (#66897 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Veteran


Posts: 109
100
OK, A while back in Washington state wife and I were going up to Langley BC to pick up her new horse. There is a weight station on I-5 that has the electronic pull in signs if they want you. We rolled in and rolled out. Sign told us to pull in but then they just sent us on the way. We pull a 31 foo extra wide and tall for the warmbloods we ride. May have been the height that set off the signs. Have never heard of a problem out here in Washingon like this.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Yvette
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-08-31 9:07 AM (#66898 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 316
100100100
Location: Illinois

Gotta love public boards dontcha? My thinking is, and I'm thinking Rick's friend may protest, is Officer Friendly was having a bad day and took it out on some horse people towing a nice trailer. I mean really three hours on the side of the highway? That's an unreasonable amount of detainment without being arrested for a 'real' crime. And sheesh, profit??? Especially at the amature level.  Many shows you are lucky if you get a purdy ribbon.

 I took my old horse to a team penning a couple of years ago. Drew a team that came in second and after paying the mandatory practice rounds and round robin rounds I still had to pay $8. LOL OK that had something to do with them decided to pay out to three places rather than the normal two. Anyway, let's see that's a negative profit of $8 plus fuel costs and not even a pretty ribbon to take home. Yup, definitely in it for the money.  Gotta say, it was a fun time and worth every penny.

 

I think some clarification needs to be put in the books to prevent further harrassment of horse owners on the highways. In the mean time I'll be glad I'm only towing a 16' stock trailer and well under combined weight of truck and trailer of 26000 lbs

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
reinergirl
Reg. Feb 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 9:25 AM (#66901 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Regular


Posts: 88
252525
Location: Youngstown, OH

I know when I started asking questions when I moved to OH, I was told my two State Highway Patrol officers that how you answered their questions was one of the most important things. Although I show reiners, you can bet when I get asked by a trooper where I'm headed the answer is going to be "to a trail ride on my uncle's farm"!

I've been trying to get a straight answer out of the state of OH for 3 years from the SHP, the PUCO and DOT and the only consistent response I have received has been from a high ranking officer in the SHP, "It really depends on which officer pulls you over. Some feel a need to make an example and others are just trying to do their job, not necessarily make your day any tougher." Secondly, he said any determination by the officer is based on your answers to the standard questions regarding your destination and what you are going to do when you get there. It is important that you give the correct answer here!

Typically they want to know if you own the truck & trailer and all the horses in it. Then they ask where you are headed.

Finally, they told me that sponsorship identification or farm/business names or logos also ID your vehicle as a potential commercial vehicle. As a result, the only logo on my new trailer says "ELITE"!

The bottom line is that individuals hauling horse trailers seem to fall into a grey area that makes us subject to the attitude of the officer pulling us over.

 

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-31 9:33 AM (#66903 - in reply to #66901)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

That's what I gleaned after wading through the regs on the website of the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Administration.The website that keeponhaulin provided on the first page of the thread.

It does say the weight stipulations of the vehicle,the trailers being towed,ect.But it does say "For Commerce."

ANd it depends on whether you get stopped by a Barney Fife or an Andy,looks to me like,and all in how they want to make the call.



Edited by crowleysridgegirl 2007-08-31 9:34 AM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Iowa NBHA Webmaster
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-08-31 11:58 AM (#66914 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 17

Location: Stockport, Iowa
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law - Cite This Source

Main Entry: com·merce
Function: noun
1 : the exchange or buying and selling of goods, commodities, property, or services esp. on a large scale and involving transportation from place to place

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 12:40 PM (#66917 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

Hey Rick

Why does your "friend" have to hide behind your skirts?  Sounds to me like he is in fact officer 394......and qualifies as a complete bag of s--t.  I repeat POOP ON IOWA

And again HOW THE HELL DOES A COP KNOW WHERE YOU ARE GOING PRIOR TO THE STOP     Rick how about asking your "friend" this

Broken Bit said a mouthfull.....HOWDY COMRAD

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
ROPE14U
Reg. Mar 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 12:45 PM (#66918 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 12

Location: Sanhills, Nebraska
dblhocker......yes roping is very profitable.............I figure any saddle or buckle I win will only of cost me about $20,000. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-31 1:22 PM (#66925 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA
Rope14U, you sound like me. I don't want to add up how much I spend to have the chance to win a little prize money....if I did, it would scare the heck out of me!

Let's see, USTRC card, $80........roping saddle, $1500.....roping horse, $7500.....chance to win a $50 buckle, priceless!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 1:25 PM (#66926 - in reply to #66917)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
Why does your "friend" have to hide behind your skirts?
_______________________________________________________

Hey - I don't wear a skirt!! I do wear riding tights, though, so I suppose some may feel that might be headed in the general direction of skirt-wearing ...

I just did my own research on this and what "I" was told by someone who should be 'in the know', according to federal law, if you make $1 while using your rig (and it doesn't matter if it cost you $500 to make that $1), you are considered a commercial enterprise. I know, I know, it's the dumbest damn thing ever, and about 98% of us are probably in violation if that's true, but it's the way it's being interpreted by many a law officer and agency. Like someone suggested earlier, the best thing to do is be headed to or home from a trail ride at your uncle's farm, no matter what you're actually doing with your horses.

As for the question on HOW THE HELL DOES A COP KNOW WHERE YOU ARE GOING PRIOR TO THE STOP...s/he doesn't need to know. If you're driving a big pickup and pulling a big trailer, you are fair game for DOT/MCSAP scrutiny. As for the traffic stop that started this thread, there are probably many details that we who weren't there don't know, so I'm not going to make any judgements either way. A thank you to those of you who have stayed rational during the whole discussion and didn't just badmouth Iowa or cops in general, but instead offered helpful info or shared examples of how laws apparently are often written in a way that seems to confuse even the people who are supposed to enforce them.

Heading out to my uncle's farm to go for a ride,
Rick

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
hosspuller
Reg. Oct 2003
Posted 2007-08-31 1:31 PM (#66927 - in reply to #66901)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2953
20005001001001001002525
Location: North Carolina
Originally written by reinergirl on 2007-08-31 8:25 AM

 he said any determination by the officer is based on your answers to the standard questions regarding your destination and what you are going to do when you get there. It is important that you give the correct answer here!

Typically they want to know if you own the truck & trailer and all the horses in it. Then they ask where you are headed.

The bottom line is that individuals hauling horse trailers seem to fall into a grey area that makes us subject to the attitude of the officer pulling us over.   

I'd like to know under what authority, does a police officer have to ask where are you going?  Is there a limit to a citizen traveling on a public road?

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 2:15 PM (#66930 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Dearest Rick,

 It would not benefit any of us who pull trailers if the story I told was a lie or if I omitted any details.  That is exactly what happened.  Hook up your trailer and go for a drive down I-29 through Hamilton county and see what happens to you. 



Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-08-31 2:17 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 2:26 PM (#66931 - in reply to #66930)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa

It would not benefit any of us who pull trailers if the story I told was a lie or if I omitted any details.  That is exactly what happened.  Hook up your trailer and go for a drive down I-29 through Hamilton county and see what happens to you. 

___________________

You kinda lost me on this one with your wording...what exactly happened, that you omitted details or do you mean what you posted at the beginning is 'what happened'? All I was saying was that only you and the trooper know all the details that we can't assume to know, so there's no way we can know who said/did what and why. So I'm not sure what your post is trying to say. I'm an honest person and don't like to lie, but if saying that I'm headed home from trail riding and not that I just won $10 at the ranch rodeo saves me from getting a bunch of CDL-related tickets, that's what I'm gonna do. But, if you're hauling for profit or as a business in any sort of way and try to hide that, yes that would not be a good idea.

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 3:08 PM (#66933 - in reply to #66931)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

All I am trying to say is that, that is exactly what happened.  The officer asked the typical questions, who owns the vehicle, where are you going, where have you been.  Unfortunatly, I was unaware by answering that I had been at a horse show that would qualify me as commercial.  However, I had already received the commercial violations and citations before he asked me where I had been.  He also wanted to know how money was made by showing horses, I said it wasn't.  He did not ask about prize money or "intent to profit". He also wanted to know a business name, we don't have one.  He used my name and "farms" after it under the motor carrier name.  As I stated before I was cited for three of the 12 violations, I should clarify which ones.  The three include: no drivers record of duty status, not marked in accordance with regulations and not licensed for type of vehicle being operated.  Some violations were for CMV and some for no CDL and somehow those over lap.

As far as saying you are coming home from a trail ride that may not save from the commecial violations because it is up to the discretion officer to decide if you are "intending to profit" or involved in commerce.  Also if you are towing a trailer with a GVWR over 10,001lbs for a total combined GVWR over 26,001lbs. you are still in violation of driving without a CDL.  I guess what it really somes down to is that you can have a perfectly legal truck and perfectly legal trailer and somehow when you hitch that two together they become illegal based on the potential weight and possible opinion of an officer.  It is a grey area issue that needs to be cleared up preferably with an exemption like the one the RVers have rallied for and received.

I hope this clears up some of the questions you have about the circumstances of my experience, if not please feel free to ask.  As this does involve ALL who haul, for whatever reasons, to and from whatever place in ALL the states, I want to be as much help and receive as much feedback as possible so we can try to resolve this issue.

Thanks

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rick
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 3:18 PM (#66936 - in reply to #66933)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 92
252525
Location: iowa
Keeponhaulin - Thanks for clarifying. You are being very civil and calm while sharing your experience - I don't think everyone would be. I look forward to the day that the laws make sense so we are at least aware what is expected of us.    
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 3:40 PM (#66937 - in reply to #66936)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Thank you for your support as well Rick.  Some other thoughs have come to mind though.  Does it not seem that if you legal vehicles become illegal after hitching them together, and being over the weight limitations, that your insurance would no longer be valid?  How many of our beloved animals have to get sick or die on the side of the road because you are "out of service until qualified" and cannot go on?  What if you have a vet emergency, such as colic, and are pulled over when every second counts?  How can the trailer companies allow you to leave their lots with out being qualified to drive what they just sold you? The broad spectrum of this issue is going to effect more than just those going to/from a show or race or the trainer or breeding farm. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 4:01 PM (#66939 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont

It just keeps getting better...

MONTPELIER — In a sharply divided decision, the Vermont Supreme Court has upheld the right of police to pull over drivers whom they suspect are impaired, even if those motorists aren’t driving erratically or breaking any traffic laws.

Full Story here...

http://www.sevendaysvt.com/nc/columns/local-matters-news/2007/vt-supreme-court-says-police-can-stop-drivers-who-are-not-breaking-law.html

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
ROPE14U
Reg. Mar 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 5:04 PM (#66947 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 12

Location: Sanhills, Nebraska
Hosspuller........you are right about the officer having no right to know where you are going.  Quite frankly when he asks you can tell him "None of your business".  It would fall under the 5th amendment of the constitution.  The only problem with that is if you have any violations you have just "flunked" the attitude test and are getting a ticket, no warnings for sure. 
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-08-31 7:27 PM (#66961 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

Howdy Comrad Vermont

I guess the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution no longer exists in Vermont.

In Tennessee, law enforcement still has to have an articulatable reason for stopping a driver;  not just a "gut feeling."  

Now the fact that Officer 394 put "Farms" after keeponhaulin's name on the ticket makes me think that the agriculture exemption should apply....

The bottom line is that people must be prepared to contest these types of stops and tickets, and not just pay them.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Broken Bit
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-08-31 10:29 PM (#66970 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Veteran


Posts: 246
10010025
Location: Northern IN.
I agree whole heartedly, however back to the point that comrad rope14u brought up, most of us "normal workin' folks" don't have the extra money layin' around to pay the 3 or 4 citations that we are getting, let alone "bucking up" to Mr. Super Trooper who gets an instant attitude that someone dares to challenge his authority, (even if we are right) now we suddenly have 8 beautifull citations to admire on our way to the next "checkpoint".  Just aint no doubt that its a real tough situation to be in, 'specially when you are far from home our out of state.  Talk to y'all later...
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-08-31 11:52 PM (#66976 - in reply to #66961)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont
Originally written by rose on 2007-08-31 8:27 PM

Now the fact that Officer 394 put "Farms" after keeponhaulin's name on the ticket makes me think that the agriculture exemption should apply....

The bottom line is that people must be prepared to contest these types of stops and tickets, and not just pay them.

The Farm exemption is for only within 150 miles of their farms...

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-01 11:19 AM (#66993 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY
So why put "Farms" on the ticket?  I am curious if anyone residing in Iowa got ticketed......
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
dblhocker
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-09-01 11:35 AM (#66994 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Regular


Posts: 51
2525
Location: Grundy Center, IA
As for anyone from Iowa getting ticketed, the Iowa DOT has been cracking down on these type of rigs now for about 2 years or so, and they don't seem to care if it's an out of state rig or not. I personally know of 3 different people from Iowa that have been stopped and ticketed.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-01 12:09 PM (#66996 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

dblhocker   Thank you for the info.  At least it's not just the out-of-state folks.  But why is Iowa doing this?

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-01 12:35 PM (#67000 - in reply to #66914)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100
Originally written by Iowa NBHA Webmaster on 2007-08-31 11:58 AM

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law - Cite This Source

Main Entry: com·merce
Function: noun
1 : the exchange or buying and selling of goods, commodities, property, or services esp. on a large scale and involving transportation from place to place

Thanks for providing that defination and information,altho I already know what commerce means.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-01 12:56 PM (#67003 - in reply to #66996)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100
Originally written by rose on 2007-09-01 12:09 PM

 But why is Iowa doing this?

That's easy.PM'd you.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Yvette
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-09-02 9:24 AM (#67019 - in reply to #67003)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 316
100100100
Location: Illinois
Originally written by crowleysridgegirl on 2007-09-01 12:56 PM

Originally written by rose on 2007-09-01 12:09 PM

 But why is Iowa doing this?

That's easy.PM'd you.



It's a secret? Or are you worried they're gonna come find you?

I'm figuring it's on the lines of 'Because they can.' and they want to see how it pans out in court. If nothing else, it's job security for the legal system.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-02 9:29 AM (#67020 - in reply to #67019)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

Yes Mam,I consider it a secret,but not because I'm worried anybody is going to come find me,because,I haven't DONE anything.

It's because my comment was not very flattering and some  would be offended,and because I'm  fed up with people on here that flame everybody when they are commenting on situations and giving honest opinions on this forum,is why.

I'll be more than happy to PM the comment to you,also.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Yvette
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-09-02 9:36 AM (#67022 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 316
100100100
Location: Illinois

Sure PM me. :)

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 11:33 AM (#67025 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

Happy Labor Day weekend everybody!!  Just wanted to remind some of you that these regulations are FEDERAL, which means they are superior to the states laws.  Check the FMCSA, FMCSR and DOT websites for full regulations.  Also, in Texas they have just passed a law/regulation that all truck drivers must speak English.  Not that that is a bad idea, but it is just another regulation.  Another thing is, starting on September 29, 2007 more regulations will enforced in more areas.  This is according to the FMCSA that is why it sounds so screwy.  Just because you have not been stopped before or have not heard of these regulations or think that you are not doing anything wrong does not mean it cannot happen to you.  These regulations have been on the books for about 20 years.  I believe the FMCSA has them down from about 1985.  It is up to the individuals to educate themselves hopefully before getting a ticket(s).  What we really need to do is get together, start a campaign and get an exemption like the RVers have done before it is impossible to haul your horse to the vet.  I have send out alot of emails and had very little response(hopefully just because it is labor day weekend) if there is a organization that you think needs this information or you would like to be on my email list please send you comments, suggestions or any email addresses of organzations you are affiliated with to keeponhaulin@yahoo.com.

Thank you again, remember the power will be in the number of people we can get together,

keeponhaulin 

I put up a post on the horse forum as well.  Basically all the same information, I am a little calmer now than I was when  I wrote the posting for this forum, so it is a bit more organized. I didn't know how many of you crossed over to the horse forum and figured everybody could use the information.



Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-02 1:01 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-02 1:18 PM (#67030 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

I am going to try to paste some info from the DOT site...

<noscript> You must enable scripting on your browser to be able to use all the functionality of the site - print this page  
<form id=frmLan name=frmLan action="" method=post>
Skip NavigationDepartment of Transportation Logo U.S. Department of TransportationKeyword Links | Contact Us | Español

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

HomeRules & RegulationsRegistration & LicensingFormsSafety & SecurityFacts & ResearchCross BorderAbout FMCSA
  Home > What is a USDOT Number? <form id=Form1 name=cn action=http://search.google.dot.gov/FMCSA/FMCSASearchProcess.asp>
(); onfocus="javascript: if(this.value == 'Search All FMCSA Sites') {this.value = '';}" value="Search All FMCSA Sites" name=q Sites? FMCSA All title?Search>
 
Overview
Company Registration
Registration Overview
What is a USDOT Number?
What is Operating Authority?
Registration Steps
What Forms Do I need?
Licensing & Insurance Requirements
New Company Requirements (New Entrant Program)
How to Register
Online Registration
Download Registration Forms
Find a Company's Status
By USDOT Number/Name
By Operating Authority
Driver Registration
Commercial Driver's License (CDL) Program
 
   

What is a USDOT Number?

  Print this page Print    

Companies that operate commercial vehicles transporting passengers or hauling cargo in interstate commerce must be registered with the FMCSA and must have a USDOT Number. Also, commercial intrastate hazardous materials carriers who haul quantities requiring a safety permit must register for a USDOT Number. The USDOT Number serves as a unique identifier when collecting and monitoring a company’s safety information acquired during audits, compliance reviews, crash investigations, and inspections.

New-Entrant Program
All first-time carrier applicants for a USDOT Number will be automatically enrolled in the FMCSA New Entrant Safety Assurance Program. This program requires new entrants to pass a safety audit and maintain acceptable roadside safety performance over an initial 18-month period before they are given permanent registration status. In most cases, companies operating exclusively as brokers or non-vehicle-operating shippers or freight forwarders do not need to obtain a USDOT Number.

Some States Require USDOT Numbers

In select states (see green highlighted states or list below), all registrants of commercial motor vehicles, even intrastate and non-Motor Carrier registrants, are required to obtain a USDOT Number as a necessary condition for commercial vehicle registration.

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
Go To Top of Page
 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-02 1:21 PM (#67031 - in reply to #67025)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

Yes,as keeponhaulin has said,we need to get together and stick together,and present a united front to those law makers/enforcers trying to stick it to horse hobbyists trying to pursue recreational activities other than running drugs,which they need to be more concerned about.Rather than concentrating on a horse trailer headed across the state.Coming from a recreational activity such as horse showing or roping or whatever.

If enough people stand up and holler about something,it's going to get noticed.Don't just lay down and let them run over us and let them strip away yet another freedom like they have slowly done with other freedoms.Such as: the USDA's National Animal ID System,a crock of crap.

I think the senators and representatives of these states need to know that horse enthusists aren't going to put up with it.If we have an organization or organizations with clout behind us,it can make a difference.

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-02 1:23 PM (#67032 - in reply to #67030)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

HA HA,notice Arkansas on this map.I knew it all the time.

If they did,then their DOT officers were seriously lazy due to the amount/kinds of stuff I see being hauled around here on every kind of flatbed trailer you can imagine,pulled by every kind of pulling machine imaginable.

FIGURES!!!

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 2:25 PM (#67034 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Does anyone have the email address for AQHA?
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-02 2:33 PM (#67035 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY
go to www.aqha.com   and it has a contact us link
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 2:48 PM (#67036 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Thanks Rose, but I've tried that and can't get it to work on my stupid machine.  If you find the actual email address let me know.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 4:11 PM (#67037 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas

I need everyone's help with this and I'm gonna make easy for you.  Listed below are some of the organizations I have sent an email to.  Please, please send them an email with your concerns or stories about the regulation issue.  If I've missed one let me know!

Andalusian  office@ialha.com

Appaloosa Sport Horse  wrhodes@apsha.org

Appaloosa (int'l colored horseICAA@aol.com

Arabian Horse Assoc.  info@ArabianHorses.org

Arabian Jockey Club  ajc@arabianracing.org

Belgian Warmblood  cmfrank@qx.net

American Buckskin  ibha@netnitco.net

Chincoteague Pony  chincoponyassoc@esva.net

Nat. Chincoteague Pony  GFreder426@aol.com

Cleveland Bay   cbhsna@aol.com

Amer. Donkey and Mule  adms@juno.com

Dutch Warmblood  office@nawpn.org

Friesian of N.A.  fhana@fhana.com

Friesian Horse Society  info@friesianhorsesociety.com

Gaited Horse Int'l Assoc.  info@gaitedhorse.com

Hackney  info@hackneysociety.com

Amer. Hanoverian  AHSoffice@aol.com

Amer. Mini Horse Assoc.  information@amha.org

Amer. Mini Horse Registry  info@shetlandminiature.com

National Show Horse Registry  nshowhorse@aol.com

Amer. Paint Horse Assoc.  askapha@apha.com

Palomino  yellahrses@palominohba.com

Performance Horse Reg. phr@asha.org

Pinto Horse Assoc. of Amer.  pinto@airmail.net

Nat. Found. QHA  NFQHA@nfqha.net

Saddlebreds  saddlebred@asha.net

Amer. Horse Council  Kerry Thompson  KThompson@horsecouncil.org

U.S. Equestrian Federation  idehner@usef.org

Texas Horse Council office@texashorsecouncil.com

Still can't find AQHA email, can't get their website to work on my computer.

Try emailing your states horse council.

Thanks again everybody!

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-02 4:29 PM (#67038 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

keeponhaulin     I think ? I sent an email to AQHA, but you might want to snail mail or call them

MAILING AND PHONE INFORMATION

Mailing
AQHA
P.O. Box 200
Amarillo, Tx 79168

Overnight Delivery
American Quarter Horse Association
1600 Quarter Horse Dr.
Amarillo, Tx 79104

Phone
Customer Service
(806) 376-4811

 

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-02 4:30 PM (#67039 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

keeponhaulin     I think ? I sent an email to AQHA, but you might want to snail mail or call them

MAILING AND PHONE INFORMATION

Mailing
AQHA
P.O. Box 200
Amarillo, Tx 79168

Overnight Delivery
American Quarter Horse Association
1600 Quarter Horse Dr.
Amarillo, Tx 79104

Phone
Customer Service
(806) 376-4811

 sorry about the double post folks.....didn't mean to.....



Edited by rose 2007-09-02 4:33 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
PaulChristenson
Reg. Jan 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 4:50 PM (#67042 - in reply to #67037)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 3853
200010005001001001002525
Location: Vermont
Originally written by keeponhaulin' on 2007-09-02 5:11 PM

I need everyone's help with this and I'm gonna make easy for you.  Listed below are some of the organizations I have sent an email to.  Please, please send them an email with your concerns or stories about the regulation issue.  If I've missed one let me know!

Andalusian  office@ialha.com

Thanks again everybody!

You missed...

Lusitanos!!!! also office@ialha.com

Percherons   percheron@percheronhorse.org

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-02 5:54 PM (#67046 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Thank you and that's why I need you guys!!!
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-02 6:00 PM (#67048 - in reply to #67046)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100
And,the Missouri Foxtrotter Horse Breed Association,www.mfthba.com
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Yvette
Reg. Jul 2006
Posted 2007-09-03 9:12 AM (#67061 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Extreme Veteran


Posts: 316
100100100
Location: Illinois
I'm thinking you may also want to contact the horse trailer manufacturers. They like selling those humongous living quarter trailers and if people are going to get bogged down in bureaucracy that could heavily impact their sales.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
Broken Bit
Reg. Jan 2006
Posted 2007-09-03 9:40 AM (#67063 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Veteran


Posts: 246
10010025
Location: Northern IN.

Yup, yup, I think that the trailer manufacturers are a great choice to get on board.  These rules will surely effect them when everybody says "I can't afford all of this D.O.T.  registration b.s., I will just have to buy a little ole 16' stock trailer instead of the 28' four horse with full L.Q. like I was really wanting."  Lots of money to be lost if that is the prevailing attitude amongst us "common folks". 

  Where do you stand DaveM, what do you think about all this?  Got any ideas of your own on the deal?  I'll bet that you sure have a lot of contacts around the country.  And maybe Mr.Truck?   Well, guess I'll talk to y'all later...

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
headhunter
Reg. Oct 2004
Posted 2007-09-03 1:55 PM (#67074 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



Elite Veteran


Posts: 736
50010010025
Location: Western WA

National Cutting Horse Assoc http://www.nchacutting.com/

National Reined Cowhorse Assoc http://www.nrcha.com/2001/default1.asp

National Reining Horse Assoc http://www.nrha.com/

All these associations pay non-pros prize money

share Top of the page Bottom of the page
rose
Reg. Feb 2004
Posted 2007-09-03 2:15 PM (#67075 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




10005001002525
Location: KY

TWHBEA

Call us at (931) 359-1574
Mail us at P.O. Box 286 or 250 N. Ellington Pkwy., Lewisburg, TN 37091

www.twhbea.com

contact page

 

<script language=javascript type=text/javascript><script language=javascript type=text/javascript>
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
flyinghfarm
Reg. Mar 2004
Posted 2007-09-03 2:17 PM (#67076 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 1205
1000100100
Location: Arkansas
Friends of ours last year, got in the same deal, they would not let them drive their brand new aluminum stock trailer home empty.  They had to sit there overnight while someone from Arkansas with a CDL came up to drive their rig out of Iowa.  They also were served with a myriad of fines etc. The man and wife had UTD drivers' licenses, had current registration , as in they had just bought it new from the dealer that day, and current proof of insurance, and thought they were ok, esp in that they were in a regular 1-ton truck with no livestock of any kind.  They will never buy anything else in Iowa nor return to Iowa, and tell their story to anyone who asks. 

Edited by flyinghfarm 2007-09-03 2:37 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
crowleysridgegirl
Reg. Apr 2005
Posted 2007-09-03 3:23 PM (#67081 - in reply to #67076)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Expert


Posts: 2614
2000500100

 

Maybe the price of corn going up will help matters around there somewhat.



Edited by crowleysridgegirl 2007-09-03 9:21 PM
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-03 10:08 PM (#67099 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Thank you for the additional websites and email addresses.  Hope everyone had a great Labor Day!  I should be receiving a bunch of emails tomorrow, hopefully everyone will be back in there offices.  I will let you all know who I have heard from and what was said Tuesday evening.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-03 10:24 PM (#67103 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
Check out "Hauling in OK?"  post, it has happened to someone else.
share Top of the page Bottom of the page
keeponhaulin'
Reg. Aug 2007
Posted 2007-09-03 11:02 PM (#67108 - in reply to #66684)
Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


Member


Posts: 38
25
Location: texas
   WEIGHT RESTRICTIONS

Non-Interstate Highways
Single axle - 20,000 pounds
Tandem axle - 34,000 pounds
Group of axles - Use Table 1 or 2 weight chart
Gross weight - Use Table 1 or 2 weight chart
Maximum weight on state highways: 80,000 pounds, 96,000 pounds for construction and livestock vehicles

Interstate Highways
Single axle - 20,000 pounds
Tandem axle - 34,000 pounds
Group of axles - Use Table 3 weight chart
Gross weight - Use Table 3 weight chart
Maximum weight on interstates - 80,000 pounds

Spread-Axle Livestock Transports
Five-axle livestock transportation trucks with a spread axle trailer are allowed to carry a gross weight of 86,000 pounds under the following conditions:

Travel over 80,000 pounds gross weight is not allowed on the Interstate Highway System. This law applies only to the Non-Interstate Highway System.

  • The truck/trailer must have at least 61 feet of overall wheelbase.
  • The trailer spread-axles must have at least 8 feet–1 inch of spacing.
  • You may only transport livestock on the vehicle.
  • You are not allowed to exceed posted bridge or roadway embargoes.

    If you have questions regarding this law, contact the Office of Motor Vehicle Enforcement at 800-925-6469, or by the Internet at http://www.dot.state.ia.us/mvd/%20omve/livestock.htm.

Update! The Governor has extended the weight overage to December 4th to assist in the completion of harvest.

Governor Vilsack signed a “proclamation of disaster emergency,” in response to Iowa’s expected “bumper crop” harvest and recent near record high temperatures, allowing Iowa farmers and grain haulers to transport loads up to 90,000 pounds of soybeans, corn, hay, straw, and stover on all highways within Iowa, excluding the Interstate system from October 6, 2006 through November 5, 2006.

Click here for a copy of the proclamation.

  ANNUAL INSPECTION

Beginning July 1, 2005, special farm trucks weighing 10,000 lbs or more will need to undergo an annual inspection. Farm trucks traveling only intrastate used to be exempt from the annual inspection requirement, but due to changes at the federal level, Iowa law now requires farm trucks be inspected as well.

· Farm trucks now must pass thorough inspection by a “qualified inspector” at least once every 12 months.
· Each vehicle in a combination is considered a separate vehicle and must pass inspection individually.
· Proof of a current annual inspection must be carried or displayed on the truck or trailer.
· Proof may be in the form of an inspection decal or a copy of an inspection report and must be produced upon request.
· Annual inspections may be performed in-house or at a commercial truck repair facility.
· Keep copies of the credentials or proof of qualifications of your inspector for up to one year after the inspection.

The carrier is responsible for ensuring the person performing the annual inspection is a “qualified inspector.”

Inspectors may be qualified through experience or training, and knowledge of regulations.

Click here for inspector qualifications.

Maintenance, repair or service to farm truck brake systems must also meet the brake inspector qualifications.

Click here for brake inspector qualifications.

Free and legally compliant inspection forms can be accessed by clicking below:

Click here for a sample Annual Truck Inspection Form.

Otherwise, inspection kits, containing an inspection book, two inspection reports, and two labels, can be purchased through Farm Home Office (Sylvette Corporation) at 1-800-788-7218. Inspection kits cost $6.98 (+ shipping and handling) and usually take two to three business days to receive by regular mail.

Inspections need to be completed every year by July 1. Farmers without proof of inspection will be in violation of this law and will be required to pay fines in the amount of $49.50. Other penalties may result from equipment defects.

More information can be found at the IDOT website: http://www.iamvd.com/omve/specialtrucks.htm

  DRIVER LICENSING

Farmers and their hired help are not required to obtain a Commercial Drivers License (CDL) as long the following criteria are met:

1. The hauling vehicle is owned by the farmer
2. The hauling distance does not exceed a one hundred fifty air mile radius of home operation.
3. The only materials being transported are those that are owned by the farmer

Please note, you may still be required to obtain a Class D Chauffeur’s license.

  VEHICLE REGISTRATION

Registration fees for vehicles pay for road construction and maintenance.

Do you travel out of state to transport your commodities? Does your vehicle meet any one of the following criteria?

1. The vehicle or combination weighs more than 26,000 lbs; or
2. The vehicle or combination is registered for more than 26,000 lbs; or
3. The power unit has three or more axles

If you do not meet any of the above criteria, you may travel freely to any other state with the appropriate Iowa licensing, registration, and insurance.

If your vehicle meets the above criteria and you have a regular county plate you must comply with one of the following guidelines:

International Registration Plan (IRP)
Vehicles that meet the above criteria are required to have an International Registration Plan (IRP).
This type of registration and plating is designed for haulers who travel out of state frequently. The IRP is very complex and requires extensive recordkeeping.

Click here to connect to the International Registration Instruction Manual.

Click here for the required application(s) and other documents.

Registration Trip Permit
If your vehicle is registered with a regular county plate, it is advisable that you purchase a single trip permit insted of the International Registration Plan. This permit is much more affordable than the IRP and easier to obtain. The permit is valid for 72 hours or for one trip and costs $10.00.

Click here for a Registration Trip Permit Application

Please not that if your vehicle is registered with a special truck license plate and you plan to travel out of state, no additional registration is needed.

Reciprocity Agreements
Farm vehicles, regardless if the above criteria are met, may travel freely to states or regions that have reciprocity agreements with the state of Iowa. Currently, Iowa farmers are allowed to travel within 30 miles of the Iowa / Wisconsin border without obtaining IRP apportioned plates or trip permits.

Click here to see a map outlining registration permit requirements for non-farm plated trucks.

 
  REGISTRATION TOLERANCE

When in Iowa, trucks or combinations transporting raw agricultural products are allowed to operate in excess of their registration weight by up to 25 percent, up to their maximum gross weight.

This list shall not be deemed conclusive and shall not exclude other commodities that might be considered raw farm products.

Ag limeFresh vegetablesPeat
Blood Grain, threshed Potatoes
Corn cobs Grain, unthreshed Raw dairy products
Dead animals Hair Raw milk
Ear corn Hay, baled/loose Saw logs
Eggs, fresh/frozenHides Separated cream
Firewood Honey Shelled corn
Flax HoneycombSod
Flax seed Live poultry Soil fertilizer
Fodder Livestock Soybeans
Fresh berries Melons Straw, baled/loose
Fresh fruit Nursery stockWool

The 25 percent registration weight tolerance for farm vehicles does not apply outside the state of Iowa, except for Iowa special (farm) plated vehicles transporting raw agricultural products operating in the state of Minnesota, which by written agreement, will be granted the 25 percent tolerance. All other states will honor the Iowa special (farm) plate as a valid license plate, but only up to the stated registered weight.

  FUEL PERMITS & TAXES

Farmers who transport their commodities to market to other states must pay fuel tax for the miles they travel in each state if their vehicle meets any one of the following criteria:

  • vehicle or combination weighs 26,000 pounds or more,
  • vehicle or combination is registered for 26,000 pounds or more
  • vehicle power unit has three or more axles
If you do not meet any of the above criteria, you may travel freely to any other state with the appropriate Iowa licensing, registration, and insurance. If you meet any one of the above criteria, there are three ways to comply the fuel tax requirements:1. Comply with an International Fuel Tax Agreement License
2. Purchase a Temporary Fuel Permit
3. Travel only to cities and states with bordering state reciprocity agreements with Iowa. International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) license must be obtained from your home state. The IFTA license costs $10.00. A copy of this license must be carried in the vehicle and produced on request. IFTA decals are required to be displayed on the exterior of the power unit, one on each side. IFTA decals are 50 cents for a set of two.

Click here for the International Fuel Tax Reporting Compliance Manual

Click here for the required application(s) and other documents Temporary Fuel Permits are an alternative to an IFTA license. A temporary fuel permit can be purchased from the destination state for $20.00 and is valid for 72 hours or for one trip, whichever comes first. Please note that some states limit the number of temporary fuel permits they issue. If the state you wish to travel to a state that is not listed on the application, you will need to contact them directly.

Click here for the Temporary Fuel Permit application Iowa has reciprocity agreements with Minnesota and Wisconsin allowing farm vehicles to operate within 30 miles of the state boarder without a fuel license or decal. Nebraska and Iowa have an agreement to allow farm vehicles to operate without fuel license or decal within the Nebraska cities of Omaha, Bellevue, Dakota City, South Sioux City and Nebraska City; and the Iowa cities of Council Bluffs, Carter Lake, Port Neal and Sioux City.

Please note, Iowa-based carriers operating an IFTA qualified vehicle in another state will need to obtain either a permanent IFTA fuel permit from Iowa, or a fuel trip permit from the state they will be operating through. If they elect the fuel trip permit, when they return to Iowa they will also need an Iowa IFTA fuel trip permit for legal re-entry. If Iowa carriers operate within the provisions of the Nebraska, Minnesota, or Wisconsin border state fuel permit agreements, no fuel permit will be required on either side of the border.


 fb SPECIAL FARM LICENSE PLATE

Special farm license plates are available for trucks or truck-tractor if they are operated under the following criteria:

not for hire

gross weight registration between 6 and 32 tons

used by a person engaged in farming

transports commodities produced or purchased by the owner for

used on the owner’s own farming operation

may assist another person engaged in farming through an exchange of services

truck-tractor can not operated more than 15,000 miles annually.


    All other states will honor the Iowa special (farm) plate as a valid license plate, but only up to the stated registered weight. This means that other states may not recognize the 25% registration weight overage allowance as used in Iowa. Contact the destination state for guidance.

     fb INTERSTATE TRAVEL

    When crossing states lines, farmers need to be aware that law enforcement officials look for U.S. Department of Transportation number, medical cards if driving combination vehicles, annual inspection records, a fire extinguisher and warning triangles (also required for intrastate travel), fuel permits for states and cities without reciprocity agreements, a log book if traveling in more than a 100 mile radius and a commercial drivers license if traveling more than 150 miles.

    Click here for a sample Interstate Travel Checklist.

    When traveling to another state it is advisable to contact their state enforcement authorities to determine exactly what is required. It is also advisable to contact the other state office well in advance of your travel date so as to ensure there is adequate time to apply for and receive the required permits. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) field offices can assist with questions and provide you with guidance concerning the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.

    Click here for contact information of FMCSA state field offices.

       GENERAL USE MESSAGE

    Transportation of commodities and farm supplies is an ever changing and complex component of an agricultural operation. This webpage is intended to help farmers comply with federal and state laws associated with the transportation of agricultural commodities and supplies as private carriers only.

    This website is not intended to be an all-inclusive guide for all types of haulers and commercial business . It should not be used as a substitute for applicable laws of the state of Iowa or federal regulations.

    Please refer to the Iowa Truck Guide if you have questions on transportation issues that are not covered here or call your local motor vehicle enforcement office.

    Click here for contact information.

     
    Found this on the Iowa Farm Bureau website
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-03 11:22 PM (#67109 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas

    Found another website with some articles about the regulations and how they effect those of us who haul.  Please check it out.  http://www.equispirit.com/ is the website.  Look under the articles tab or try this www.eqispirit.com/info/articles.htm

     

    www.nyshc.com/currentissues/CDLrequirementsforhorsetrailers PDF

    www.drafthorsejournal.net/autumn2006/lawandhorses.htm    This article was written by an attorney who also has horses. 

    Try searching: horse trailer hauling regulations, for more articles 



    Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-03 11:44 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-03 11:38 PM (#67110 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas

    Thought this might help as well.

     

     

    How Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations Affect Horse Trailers.

    by Sean Kelleylast modified 2006-10-21 01:33

    In 1986, Congress passed the Federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act (FCMVSA/86). This law requires each State to meet the same minimum standards for commercial driver licensing. The states may have more stringent regulations of their own, but they may not lessen the standards.


    Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) has two definitions according to The United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), Federal Highway Administration FHWA. The difference comes into play when discussing requirements for Commercial Driver's License (CDL) and Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR)

    FOR THE PURPOSES OF COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE (CDL)

    Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) - a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle -

    1. has a gross combination weight rating (GCWR) of 26,001 lbs. or more inclusive of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 10,000 lbs.
    2. has a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of 26,001 lbs. or more or
    3. is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver: or
    4. is of any size and is used in the transportation of materials found to be hazardous for the purposes of the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and which require the motor vehicle to be placarded under the Hazardous Materials Regulations.

    FOR THE PURPOSES OF FEDERAL MOTOR CARRIER SAFETY REGULATIONS (FMCSR)

    Commercial Motor Vehicle means any self-propelled or towed vehicle used on public highways in interstate commerce to transport passengers or property when:

    1. the vehicle has a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) or gross combination weight rating (GCVWR) or 10,001 or more pounds; or
    2. the vehicle is designed to transport more than 15 passengers, including the driver; or
    3. the vehicle is used in the transportation of hazardous materials in a quantity requiring placarding under regulations issued by the Secretary under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act.

    Interstate Commerce - Any trade, traffic, or transportation in any State which is between a place in a State and a place outside of such State (including a place outside of the United States) or is between two places in a State through another State or a place outside of the United States.

    Intrastate Commerce - 1. Any trade, traffic, or transportation in any State which is not described in the term "interstate commerce" 2. Wholly within one state.

    "Commerce" can be more loosely defined as actually "involved in a commercial venture" or the "intent" to make a profit. This does not mean actually making a profit! Running a commercial stable, hauling horses for show (with intent to profit), race, sale, training, or for compensation are some examples of commercial enterprises. Prize money and showing to increase the value of the horse can be interpreted as profit.

    The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations (FMCSR) in general deal with the marking of the vehicle (identification signs on the vehicle), inspection sticker, medical card, log book, emergencies procedures, and parts and accessories necessary for safe operation. US DOT, FHWA publishes the Federal Motor Carrier Regulations Pocketbook.


    How do these regulations and terms apply to horse trailers?

    1. If you are driving a vehicle or combinations of vehicles under 10,001 lbs. GVWR or GCVWR, you don't have to be concerned with the FMCSR's or a commercial driver's license (CDL). You must, however, follow the safety equipment requirements and driver's license requirements of your own state.
    2. If you are driving a vehicle or combination of vehicles interstate 10,001 to 26,000 pounds GVWR, you must decide if you are commercial and subject to FMCSR. You do not need a commercial driver's license (CDL), although your home state may have an additional classification of driver's license. (The initial decision is up to the owner whether or not he/she is pursuing a hobby or is involved in interstate commerce and he/she bears the burden of proof. If you only travel within your state, you may follow the state definitions of commercial, but if you plan to travel into other states and your vehicle or combination is 10,001 lbs or more, the official recommendation from Federal Authorities is that you follow FMCSR's)
    3. If you are driving a vehicle or combination of vehicles intrastate 10,001 to 26,000 lbs GVWR, you must follow your home state requirements if they differ from the Federal requirements.
    4. If you are driving a vehicle or combinations of vehicles 26,001 lbs. GVWR or more interstate you must have a commercial driver's license (CDL) and you must follow FMCSR.
    5. If you are driving a vehicle or combination of vehicles 26,001 lbs. GVWR or more intrastate, you must follow your state guidelines for commercial licensing (CDL), and FMCSR requirements.

    Farm exemptions can be obtained in some instances, but the vehicle must stay within 150 miles of home.
    Many states require trucks and trailers to have license plates that are labeled "commercial" but this does not always mean you are considered "commercial" in all states.

    This article was written by Neva and Tom Scheve, authors of the, "The Complete Guide to Buying, Maintaining, and Servicing a Horse Trailer" and the owners of EquiSpirit Horse Trailers.

    Your equine discipline

    What is your main equine activity?

    <form name=results action=http://www.horse101.com/portal/polls/discipline_poll/vote method=post encType=multipart/form-data>
    All-Around Rider
    Barrel Racing
    Breeder
    Calf Roping
    Cutting
    Dressage
    Driving
    Endurance Riding
    Eventing
    Foxhunter
    Hunter
    Jumping
    Packing
    Polo
    Racing
    Reining
    Saddle Seat
    Trail Riding
    Vaulting
    Western Riding
    Other

    advertisements
    <script type=text/javascript><script src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js" type=text/javascript><iframe name=google_ads_frame marginWidth=0 marginHeight=0 src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/ads?client=ca-pub-0632495136817595&dt=1188880529578&lmt=1188880529&prev_fmts=728x90_as&format=120x600_as&output=html&correlator=1188880528250&channel=1921790370&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.horse101.com%2Fportal%2FHorse_Trailer_Articles%2FFederal_Regulations_Horse%2520Trailers%2F&color_bg=FFFFE4&color_text=333333&color_link=000000&color_url=336699&color_border=FFFFFF&ad_type=text&ref=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.horse101.com%2Fportal%2FHorse_Trailer_Articles&cc=100&ga_vid=1727651386.1188880488&ga_sid=1188880488&ga_hid=1706548546&ga_fc=true&flash=9&u_h=768&u_w=1280&u_ah=738&u_aw=1280&u_cd=32&u_tz=-300&u_his=130&u_java=true" frameBorder=0 width=120 scrolling=no height=600 allowTransparency>
    « September 2007 »
    SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    1
    2345678
    9101112131415
    16171819202122
    23242526272829
    30
     
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Iowa NBHA Webmaster
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 6:17 AM (#67118 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 17

    Location: Stockport, Iowa
    Another organization you might contact is the Iowa Horse Council,  http://www.iowahorsecouncil.org/
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Yvette
    Reg. Jul 2006
    Posted 2007-09-04 9:06 AM (#67122 - in reply to #67108)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Extreme Veteran


    Posts: 316
    100100100
    Location: Illinois

    International Registration Plan (IRP)
    Vehicles that meet the above criteria are required to have an International Registration Plan (IRP).
    This type of registration and plating is designed for haulers who travel out of state frequently. The IRP is very complex and requires extensive recordkeeping.

    Click here to connect to the International Registration Instruction Manual.

    Click here for the required application(s) and other documents.

     

    Since when is crossing state lines considered international travel? This is insane and definitely a money grab for the feds and states. Ug. Sounds like to be exempt, but still have living quarters and room for tack, etc. is to buy a 30 or 40 foot RV and tow a two horse trailer.

    Otherwise, lots of good trail riding stories are going to be needed.

    And the definition of commerce involving horses is absolutely rediculous. Hauling a horse to a show to increase it's value, bah. Or funnier yet, win money. LOL Most of us keep our horses for life, or donate them to a riding program or child as a first horse long after the horse has lost his/her commercial value. Please, these people really need to get a grip.

     

    Or more, they need to make an amatuer/hobbyist exemption. Cause trust me, I ain't in it for the money. And more importantly, I don't haul regularly enough to be required to jump through that many hoops to goto the very rare and occasional show. Sheesh, Big Brother is upon us.

     

    Then again, if that is the federal definition of intent to profit is just taking a horse to a horse show, does that mean I can goto one show and then write off my years expenses on my horses with the IRS? Shoot, I won't be paying any taxes at the end of the year with that definition. ;)

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 9:33 AM (#67125 - in reply to #67118)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    Originally written by Iowa NBHA Webmaster on 2007-09-04 6:17 AM

    Another organization you might contact is the Iowa Horse Council,  http://www.iowahorsecouncil.org/[/QUOTE]

    There is a link on this website that goes to the Iowa Legislature website.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    threeman
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-04 10:48 AM (#67128 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Extreme Veteran


    Posts: 346
    10010010025

     

    I agree with the writing off deal problem is that then it does become a business.  Also according to my accountant I can only show a loss for 7 years.  jeez what then?  I have been loosing every year.  there is no way for the amateur competitor to profit.  ITS A HOBBY.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    headhunter
    Reg. Oct 2004
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:06 AM (#67131 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Elite Veteran


    Posts: 736
    50010010025
    Location: Western WA

    I received the following response from Washington State DOT in regard to the question of whether I need a CDL.  I will be printing it out and keeping a copy in my truck:

    You are not required to have a CDL to drive the vehicle configuration you have described.

    1) The total GVWR is under 26001 lbs.

    2) You are operating a recreational type vehicle not for hire

    3) You are not hauling livestock to market.

     

    I pull a horse trailer with full living quarters (includes shower and toilet) with a GVWR of 12,000 lbs with a Ford F350 (one ton) pickup with a GVWR of 11,500.  I attend horse shows where I win prize money, but I have non-pro/amateur status as horses and horse shows are my hobby not my occupation.   My expenses far exceed my winnings, I am not required to report my winnings to the IRS.  Am I exempt from needing a CDL to operate my truck while pulling my trailer? 

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:13 AM (#67132 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
     If your combined GVWR weight is under 26,001lbs,  you would not fit under the CDL regulations.  However your tralier GVWR seems really light considering the size of your trailer.  I also have a 3 horse with living quarter.  The actual weight of my trailer is around 11,080lbs and the GVWR is 20,000lbs, so you might want to recheck your weight.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:14 AM (#67133 - in reply to #67131)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    Well  if you're not,you sure as the H-- ought to be IMO!!!!
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:51 AM (#67135 - in reply to #67131)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    I contacted our state DOT dept.and talked with several people.They said they had never heard of anything so ridiculous in their lives.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:54 AM (#67136 - in reply to #67125)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    Originally written by crowleysridgegirl on 2007-09-04 9:33 AM

    Originally written by Iowa NBHA Webmaster on 2007-09-04 6:17 AM

    Another organization you might contact is the Iowa Horse Council,  http://www.iowahorsecouncil.org/[/QUOTE]

    There is a link on this website that goes to the Iowa Legislature website.

    AND it might figure that this link has permanent fatal errors and was returned to me twice.(The Iowa Legislature omsbudman's web address.)

    They probably don't have one anymore!!!

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:58 AM (#67138 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
    I agree that these laws are ridiculous.  Now we just need to convince the FEDERAL goverment that they are.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    headhunter
    Reg. Oct 2004
    Posted 2007-09-04 11:59 AM (#67139 - in reply to #67132)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Elite Veteran


    Posts: 736
    50010010025
    Location: Western WA

    That's what the tag says on the trailer, so that's my story and I'm sticking with it ;-)

    I know what my trailer weighs empty as I had to weigh it when I licensed it since I bought it out of state.  I believe my trailer mnfct lists the GVWR as the weight on the axles not the total trailer weight, as the axles and tires are rated way higher than 12,000 lbs.

    Originally written by keeponhaulin' on 2007-09-04 9:13 AM

     If your combined GVWR weight is under 26,001lbs,  you would not fit under the CDL regulations.  However your tralier GVWR seems really light considering the size of your trailer.  I also have a 3 horse with living quarter.  The actual weight of my trailer is around 11,080lbs and the GVWR is 20,000lbs, so you might want to recheck your weight.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-04 12:24 PM (#67142 - in reply to #67138)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    Yes,they are.Just spoke with an officer from my state's DOT dept.and she said that they all follow the same Federal rules,and,it is true that if you are hauling to/from a show,breeder,ect.it can be seen as a commercial enterprise,and yes,you CAN be fined.So these guys harda-- as they may seem,were really operating within the boundries of the laws,and deciding for some reason to get strict with everybody hauling horses or whatever.

    Instead of concentrating on real lawbreakers,I might add.

    Well,yes,we DO need to get busy and get this BS stopped.The horse industry as a whole has taken a downturn as it is,so,this won't help if it continues.We need to stand up and holler!!!

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-04 12:40 PM (#67145 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
     I just emailed my state rep's on this subject.  It would be beneficial if y'all emailed your state rep's as well.  The more the better.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-04 12:50 PM (#67147 - in reply to #67122)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont
    Originally written by Yvette on 2007-09-04 10:06 AM

    International Registration Plan (IRP)
    Vehicles that meet the above criteria are required to have an International Registration Plan (IRP).
    This type of registration and plating is designed for haulers who travel out of state frequently. The IRP is very complex and requires extensive recordkeeping.

    Click here to connect to the International Registration Instruction Manual.

    Click here for the required application(s) and other documents.

     

    Since when is crossing state lines considered international travel? This is insane and definitely a money grab for the feds and states. Ug. Sounds like to be exempt, but still have living quarters and room for tack, etc. is to buy a 30 or 40 foot RV and tow a two horse trailer.

    Otherwise, lots of good trail riding stories are going to be needed.

    And the definition of commerce involving horses is absolutely rediculous. Hauling a horse to a show to increase it's value, bah. Or funnier yet, win money. LOL Most of us keep our horses for life, or donate them to a riding program or child as a first horse long after the horse has lost his/her commercial value. Please, these people really need to get a grip.

     

    Or more, they need to make an amatuer/hobbyist exemption. Cause trust me, I ain't in it for the money. And more importantly, I don't haul regularly enough to be required to jump through that many hoops to goto the very rare and occasional show. Sheesh, Big Brother is upon us.

     

    Then again, if that is the federal definition of intent to profit is just taking a horse to a horse show, does that mean I can goto one show and then write off my years expenses on my horses with the IRS? Shoot, I won't be paying any taxes at the end of the year with that definition. ;)

    This is for farmers...The International Registration Plan (IRP) is a registration reciprocity agreement among jurisdictions of the United States and Canada. The agreement provides for payment of license fees on the basis of fleet miles operated in various jurisdictions.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    jjohn436
    Reg. Aug 2006
    Posted 2007-09-04 1:45 PM (#67152 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 5

    Location: elma, ny 14059
    Hi all,
    I have a question for someone more knowledgeable about this than I am. If anyone over legal driving age can drive a RV of any size, then why can't we license our LQ trailers as RV's that just happen to have accommodations for a horse or horses. Just a thought.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    dblhocker
    Reg. Jan 2006
    Posted 2007-09-04 2:11 PM (#67154 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 51
    2525
    Location: Grundy Center, IA
    Good question, jjohn436. In Iowa, it's up to each individual county if they would license a vehicle as an RV or not.

    In many college towns, it's common for the bars to go together and buy an old school bus to haul patrons home so they aren't drinking and driving. If they put a pizza oven, a porta potty, and I believe a way to wash hands in these buses, they then can be licensed as an RV, and then the DOT can't touch them. It would be nice if we could get this done with our horse trailers, would sure eliminate a lot of potential headaches.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-04 6:28 PM (#67166 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas

    Well, I have not heard back from as many horse organizations as I had hoped.  American Mule and Donkey will be running my story in BRAYER.  They said they had run an article last year about this. Hopefully I will have more info. tomorrow.  It's a start. 

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-05 12:24 AM (#67203 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico

    This is making the "converted" RV that was on here awhile back that everyone was badmouthing look better and better.  Put some air vents on the sides/roof with fans and a full rear door and no one would know there were horses inside. 

    Either that or a slide in truck camper and a small stock trailer.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    ggrimm01
    Reg. Aug 2005
    Posted 2007-09-05 1:02 PM (#67242 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 95
    252525
    Location: East Central Kansas

    For our horse trailer, we licensed the vehicle as an RV.  So if I get pulled over by the friendly police department or state troopers,  I am going/coming to/from a trail ride in my RV.  I would like to see how many sitations I get then.......

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    aegnc
    Reg. Sep 2007
    Posted 2007-09-05 10:42 PM (#67302 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 13

    Location: texas

    As stated in an earlier post, the FMCSA regulations do provide for an exemption if the vehicle is used for "The occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise."

    The fact that one may win a few dollars of prize money or increase the value of their horse is the point of contention on whether this is considered commercial.  However, the guidance section associated with this exemption specifically addresses the act of hauling horses to a show where prize money may be one.  Here's the guidance directly from the FMCSA....

    "Question 21: Does the exemption in §390.3(f)(3) for the "occasional transportation of personal property by individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise" apply to persons who occasionally use CMVs to transport cars, boats, horses, etc., to races, tournaments, shows or similar events, even if prize money is offered at these events?

    Guidance: The exemption would apply to this kind of transportation, provided: (1) The underlying activities are not undertaken for profit, i.e., (a) prize money is declared as ordinary income for tax purposes, and (b) the cost of the underlying activities is not deducted as a business expense for tax purposes; and, where relevant; (2) corporate sponsorship is not involved. Drivers must confer with their State of licensure to determine the licensing provisions to which they are subject."

    This seems pretty clear regarding the applicability of the FMCSA regulations to the vehicle(s). 

    If the combination of vehicle weights (GVWR's) exceeds 26001 lbs., the driver still likely needs a Class A CDL.

    The following link has a good summary of this: http://www.motorists.org/other/home/dot-numbering-requirements/

    Hope this helps.  I've been struggling with this issue for the last year and a half.

    Dave

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-06 8:01 AM (#67313 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY
    aegnc     What an excellent website and an organization that we who haul horses a lot really need to join......   While it is  a pain to fight an out of state ticket, the resources of this organization look excellent
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    dressagedad
    Reg. Jun 2007
    Posted 2007-09-06 6:46 PM (#67359 - in reply to #67313)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 6

    Location: Maryland
    ... and therein lies the revenue opportunity for Iowa. How many people are going to expend the time and effort to fight an out of state ticket?
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    foxpointfarm
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-06 7:34 PM (#67362 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 21

    Location: Smyrna, DE

    Per the FMCSA web site and motorists.org, you need to comply with FMCSA regs if you take the horses off on your taxes. So, if you are NOT a business and are hauling a large trailer, make sure you have the following in your truck to show the honorable DOT officer:

    1. Copy of the FMSCA regulations with the dog-eared page explaining the hobbyist exception

    2. Your tax return that shows you claimed prize money as ordinary income and DID NOT take any horse expenses off on your taxes.

    3. Make sure you are not exceeding any of your axle, tire, or registration ratings.

    If you still receive an out of state ticket for violating FMSCA violations, by all means, fight it!

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-07 12:52 AM (#67385 - in reply to #67359)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont

    Originally written by dressagedad on 2007-09-06 7:46 PM

    ... and therein lies the revenue opportunity for Iowa. How many people are going to expend the time and effort to fight an out of state ticket?

    You hire a local attorney to represent you in court...you are not required to be present...only a legal representative for you needs to be present...a lot cheaper in the long run than what your insurance company will do to you when all those points hit your license...



    Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-09-07 12:54 AM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Yvette
    Reg. Jul 2006
    Posted 2007-09-07 3:31 AM (#67390 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Extreme Veteran


    Posts: 316
    100100100
    Location: Illinois

    When I go watch events like The Kentucky Three Day Event, more commonly known as 'The Rolex' I've noticed on some of the bigger rigs that are often parked at the campground at the Horse Park that they have the letters 'Not For Hire' on them instead of a DOT number. I'm wondering if this declaration is all that is needed to let the police know that you are not a commercial hauler? Remember, even that the Rolex level, many of those people riding are still amatuers as they do not train for anyone else or buy or sell horses for that matter.

    I've also seen race car rigs on the highway, with the same declaration on the truck. I'm wondering if we are just missing the fact that we need to tag our trucks with 'Not For Hire' to let the police know you are a hobbyist?

    Any thoughts, or is this a grey area?

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    horsey1
    Reg. Dec 2004
    Posted 2007-09-07 8:30 AM (#67397 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Elite Veteran


    Posts: 720
    500100100
    By putting "Not For Hire", it means you don't need a ICC number (Interstate Commerce Commission) which hired carriers are required to post. Virtually everyone needs a DOT. If you see the rigs with vigilant owners, you'll see a USDOT #####, AND "Not For Hire". Just see a "Not For Hire", and the diesel cops think you're up to something..... Just my .02$
    H1
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Yvette
    Reg. Jul 2006
    Posted 2007-09-07 2:03 PM (#67418 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Extreme Veteran


    Posts: 316
    100100100
    Location: Illinois

    Nope, only seen NOT FOR HIRE, no DOT # on those trucks. Likely as they are deemed personal use, not commercial use. The problem now, is the political people that are putting a spin on the DOT laws for monetary gain/job security and heck more red tape and vehicles to inspect could create a few more jobs for buddies. While at the same time keeping police busy bothering the wrong people.

    Now if they want to require a class A non-CDL to make sure the people hauling these outfits are capable of doing so, great.  Frankly, watching some people haul monster camper trailers and drive gigantic RV's I'd be more than quite all right with that. So absolutely no problem there, but they shouldn't have to get a CDL, don't bog us down in the buracracy that was set up to keep businesses on the up and up. Mostly to keep them from having employed truckers driving too many hours before getting rest.

     

    If I had a living quarters trailer I would seriously look into getting it registered as a recreational trailer.

     

     

    Modified: did a little reading and it seems you are correct about the 'Not For Hire' not being used instead of DOT numbers, but it seems people may be using it without DOT numbers as well. It's all really confusing isn't it?



    Edited by Yvette 2007-09-07 11:35 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Lynn0202
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-10 9:35 AM (#67576 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Veteran


    Posts: 152
    1002525
    Location: Florence, SC

    I posed the following question both to the SC DMV & DOT. Here's what I got.

    I am thinking of purchasing a horse trailer with Living Quarters (RV style). The trailer would be used to haul my family horses on camping trips (purely recreational). The trailer has a GVWR of nearly 17,000 pounds. The truck I haul with has a GVWR of 10,500. This puts me over the 26,000 pound requirement for CDL although I am not using the rig for commercial purposes. Would I be required to have a CDL to drive this?

    The DOT: As long as this combination of vehicles are strictly recreational
    vehicles and not being used in a business a CDL is not required.
     Sgt. J.T. Hayes
    State Transport Police / District Five
     The DMV: I contacted my CDL help desk in regards to your question. I was advised 
    that you will have to get a CDL, and you will have to get a DOT medical card as well.       

    Tracking Number: 1186044

    Rodney

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    dinero01
    Reg. Jun 2006
    Posted 2007-09-10 9:47 AM (#67577 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 31
    25
    Location: Oz land

    This is interesting.  As I have check in my state of KS - I was told, that I am not required to have a CDL - as long as I am hauling horses only with my dually pickup and 3H slant LVG qtr trailer.  I am not required to have a CDL. This is per the DOT.

     

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-10 10:06 AM (#67578 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
    I'm glad everyone is checking with their states to see what the "rules" are.   I hope that the states are aware of the FMCSA regulations, I know most of us were not, being that these are Federal regulations.  It still seems that there is some confusion.  Some states say you are legal but when you cross state lines you are not.  I still believe something needs to be done on a National level. I have not heard back from most of the organizations I have emailed or my state reps.  I'm very diasppointed, however I am just one person with a problem, the power lies in the numbers.  I encourage all of you to send in your own stories and concerns to your horse organizations and state reps, so that we can trully clear up this issue on a National level.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-10 11:09 AM (#67586 - in reply to #67578)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    Just came back from a WOrld show,and mostly everyone I talked to there that was showing,brought horses to sell,ect.promoting their horses,ect.the usual,didn't have CDL licenses,and don't intend to.I sure got some funny looks when I would ask that,also.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-10 6:32 PM (#67615 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
    I talked to my Allstate insurance man today about the tickets.  He of course, gave me a strange look when he read the tickets.  He'd never heard of this before.  Told me, this is good, that no matter what I am insured. Period.  If anything happens, more tickets, accident, etc., I am covered.  So that is really good news.  I asked about not being "qualified" to drive my "rig."  (Not having a CDL while driving a combined vehicle with a GVWR over 26,001lbs.)  He told me that I am insured no matter what, the trailer is insured and the truck is insured so that's all he cares about.  He also wished me luck on my mission of justice for the horse hauler. 

    Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-10 6:34 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-11 3:42 PM (#67677 - in reply to #67397)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY
    To horsey1     Why does "virtually everyone" need a DOT number?
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-11 5:52 PM (#67689 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas

    Okay, I think I have found a loophole.  Here goes, all this information I pulled directly off the FMCSA website, according to 390.3 General applicability section, part (f)" Exemptions. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules of this subchapter do not apply to-  (f)(2)  The occassional transportation of personal property by individulas not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise;" .This would lead me to believe that "occasional" hauling would not make you a commercial motor vehicle.  Who's to say how "occasionally" you haul?   I'm not sure, but that might get you out of the DOT# part as well since you are not a CMV.  Next thing I found is also from the FMCSA 383.5 Definitions under the General section.  The definition of a "Commercial Motor Vehicle(CMV) means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used in commerce to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle- (a)Has a GROSS COMBINATION WEIGHT RATING(GCWR) of 26,001lbs or more inclusive of a towed unit(s) with a GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT RATING(GVWR) of more than 10,000lbs; or".   Thought you already knew that?  There is a difference between a GCWR and GVWR. Here are the defintions for those also under the 383.5 section "GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT RATING (GVWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a single vehicle."  Should be on a sticker on the inside of your trucks door. It can also be found on a sticker on the goose part of some horse trailers.  Here other defintion  "GROSS COMBINATION WEIGHT RATING (GCWR) means the value specified by the manufacturer as the loaded weight of a combination(articulated) vehicle. IN THE ABSENCE OF A VALUE SPECIFIED BY THE MANUFACTURER, GCWR will be determined by adding the GVWR of the power unit and the total weight of the towed unit and any load thereon."

    So, it seems to me that if you remove that sticker from you horse trailer, then they don't know the actual GCWR.  Here is how it would apply to my "rig".  When I got the tickets the officer said my truck had a GVWR of 10,000lbs(sticker on the door) and the trailer had a GVWR of 20,000lbs (sticker on the goose of the trailer) for a total of 30000.  Way over the 26,001+ limit.  Like I stated before, I weighed my "rig"(both truck and trailer) at a CAT scale, loaded down with luggage, 2 horses, full tank of diesel etc. and it came out to 22,780lbs.  Well under the weight limit. I'm sure even with one more horse in the trailer it would not exceed the limit. So, I think I will be pulling that GVWR sticker off the trailer, they can take me to the weigh station to get a GCWR.  If the GCWR is under 26,000lbs I should not need a CDL. Could be a temporary fix to CDL/CMV regulation BS. You guys tell me what you think, if that wasn't too confusing.

     



    Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-11 5:56 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-11 6:04 PM (#67691 - in reply to #67689)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico

    I e-mailed a guy at the Tx DOT and he said it was the ACTUAL weight of the vehicle/trailer that counted, not what it was rated for.  I posted the e-mail on here a couple of years ago.  I may still have it.  

    I emailed the Trouper and asked him to look over this thread if he has the time and try to explain to us what the law really is.



    Edited by Terri 2007-09-11 6:16 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-11 8:10 PM (#67695 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    keeponhaulin

    Have you talked to an attorney in Iowa about contesting the tickets using the weight scale print-out?   Please update on the ticket proceedings.  Thanks.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    aegnc
    Reg. Sep 2007
    Posted 2007-09-11 10:16 PM (#67716 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 13

    Location: texas

    ...I too would be very interested in the ticket proceedings.  Heck, I'd even chip in to a "keeponhaulin' legal defense fund" to see where this ends up.  In my opinion there are a few other considerations:

    There are two things in play, the requirements of the vehicle, and those of the driver.  As to the vehicle, based on keeponhaulin's description it clearly does not fall under the classification of a commercial vehicle, thus requiring a DOT# and all the associated requirments.  Reference the FMCSA regulations part 390.3(f) and associated guidance question and answer (21).

    What is less clear is the requirement of the driver to have some form of class A CDL.  For this situation the federal requirements (which are the minumum to be used by the states) requires any combination of GVRWs over 26001, provided the trailer is over 10001 to have a class A CDL, unless it is an RV, used soley for that purpose.  Reference the FMCSA part 383.3 and associated guidance.  The kicker is that the states may have more stringent requirements.  I'm not sure what Iowa has, but Texas requires a class A CDL, or class A non-cdl for all vehicles of this weight range.  If licensed properly in Texas, this should apply to Iowa.

    A couple other comments:

    • Removing the VIN plate from the trailer is probably a red flag for any officer.  The FMCSA regulations part 383 guidance actually addresses this, and basically says you're assumed guilty until proven innocent...
    • As far as actual vehicle weights and GVWR(s) on the vehicles, the regulations always refer to the GVWR, instead of the actual weight, unless the actual weight is greater.  Seems crazy, but that's the way they're written.
    • When talking to government "officials" (I use that term loosely) expect to get a different answer from each one.

    One final question for keeponhaulin'.  I don't understand the GVWR(s) of 10,000 lb. for your F-350 and 20,000 lb. for your trailer.  Where did the officer get these?  The truck seems on the light side for a F-350 dually, and the trailer on the heavy.  The scale readings put the truck at 12100 (4540 stear, 7560 drive), which is way over this GVWR.  This could cause DPS/DOT and insurance problems if it is correct.  My guess is that it is not. 

    The reason I ask is that after purchasing our F-350 and 40' (OAL) living quarters trailer 1 and 1/2 years ago I've been dealing with the same issues.  The dealers actually incorrectly registered both the truck and trailer weights such that the truck was way under (and subject to a ticket) and the trailer was way over.  The trailer with two 8K axles has a GVWR of 16,000 lb., however they registered it for 29,000 lbs. It took about a year, and hours on the phone to fix these.

    Sorry to ramble on...

    Regards,

    Dave

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-11 10:51 PM (#67718 - in reply to #67716)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico
    I've found that Vin plates are frequently missing on older trailers that have been repainted.   They are either painted over or were taken off during prep and not put back on.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-11 11:20 PM (#67721 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas

    I'm gonna try to answer everybodies questions.  Have not yet talked to an attorney in Iowa.  Have spoken with several in Texas, and gotten a bunch of different answers, mostly that I have violated at least one of the regulations which I received. Alot of trailers I have looked at, not just horse trailers, do not have a manufactures sticker that has the GVWR on them, some have axel ratings or actual weights.  Don't know why the officer said my F-350 dually had a GVWR of 10,000lbs. when I looked the sticker said 13,000lbs.  I am aware that all the weights in the regulations are either GVWR or GCVR, I just found it interesting that the actual weight of my combined truck and trailer was way less than the 26,000lb limitation and how much more weight the manufacturer states these two vehicles can carry.  I can't imagine what else I could put in my truck or trailer to get there, thought the 6 pairs of shoes were ridiculous.  I have found that the states regulations can be more or less particular than the FMCSA regulations.  I really need one source to tell what they want from me.  I do travel across state and counrty borders and need to be able to do so without being legal in some and not others. Only some states require DOT numbers, Texas and New Mexico do not so hopefully I can get through the next show without a DOT number citation.  This is so frustrating because I keep getting different answers from the "officials" who are there to inform the rest of us and they don't know themselves.  I hope I answered some of your questions. 

     Missed one, gotta look into that GVWR being wrong on the trailer.  Just searched a similar trailer that is same size, didn't look at the extras, and it was rated 2,000lbs less than mine, very interesting.



    Edited by keeponhaulin' 2007-09-11 11:32 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    dblhocker
    Reg. Jan 2006
    Posted 2007-09-12 8:28 AM (#67728 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 51
    2525
    Location: Grundy Center, IA
    Keeponhaulin', I would double check with the manufacturer of the trailer as to the GVW of the trailer, it seems high to me. When the friend of mine got stopped for the same things you did, the GVW rating on his F350 dually was 11,500 and the GVW rating on his trailer was 15,000, making his total weight rating 26,500. After researching his trailer, he found he had two 7000 pound axles. After calling the trailer manufacturer, he got them to send him a revised tag for his trailer which listed the GVW at 14,000, which then put him under the 26,001 threshold.

    His trailer is a 4 horse, 8' wide with a 12' shortwall full living quarters.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Lynn0202
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-12 9:52 AM (#67737 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Veteran


    Posts: 152
    1002525
    Location: Florence, SC

    My trailer is a 3 horse with 10' LQ. The axles are 7k each and the tag says 16,646 for GVWR. If the trailer was rated closer to the 14k I wouldn't be over 26k.

    I sent DHMCO (wonderful people BTW, excellent buying experience) an email about it this AM.  They are inquring to Bison about this and will let me know.

    I also found that nobody in law enforcement can't agree how to interpret the laws and regulations. I think I'll print and keep in my truck the info applicable to me and even if it doesn't save me a ticket, the officer will know I've attempted to do right.



    Edited by Lynn0202 2007-09-12 9:53 AM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    retento
    Reg. Aug 2004
    Posted 2007-09-12 10:48 AM (#67742 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3802
    20001000500100100100
    Location: Rocky Mount N.C.
    Ya'll have about convinced me to turn in my tags and cancel my insurance and paint the words "FARM EQUIPMENT" on both sides! Take the money saved on license and insurance and pay the occasional fines...........And keep on driving and hauling. Don't worry about nuthin........Just GO!!!

    Edited by retento 2007-09-12 4:58 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-12 5:50 PM (#67773 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico

    Ok, I think I have found what type of license I would need here in NM to be legal.  My trailer has a GVWR of 14,000lbs so I would need a non commercial class E acording to this.    I think.

    http://wwwdgr.unm.edu/gradlicense/licenseCATEGORIES.htm



    Edited by Terri 2007-09-12 7:07 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    memory
    Reg. Jul 2007
    Posted 2007-09-12 10:04 PM (#67784 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Veteran


    Posts: 153
    1002525
    Location: Iowa
    My dealer told me that if I put in a shower and tolet, I can register my trailer as an RV in Iowa. His is.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-12 10:17 PM (#67786 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    Here in TN horses are still considered "livestock" so our trailer IS farm equipment.

    I saw somewhere that Iowa has classified horses as something other than livestock but do not know what that is or why.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-12 11:02 PM (#67791 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    The following is from Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-50-102

    (20“Driver licenses — Classes of” means:

              (A)  Class A.  This license shall be issued and valid for the operation of any combination of motor vehicles with a Gross Combination Weight Rating (G.C.W.R.) in excess of twenty-six thousand pounds (26,000 lbs.), provided the vehicle or vehicles being pulled have a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.) in excess of ten thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.). Persons holding a valid Class A license may operate vehicles in Classes B, C and D, but not Class M vehicles, or vehicles which require a special endorsement unless the proper endorsement appears on the license;

              (B)  Class B.  This license shall be issued and valid for vehicles with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.) in excess of twenty-six thousand pounds (26,000 lbs.), or any such vehicle towing a vehicle not in excess of ten thousand pounds (10,000 lbs.) Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.). Persons holding a valid Class B license may operate vehicles in Classes C and D, but not vehicles in Classes A and M, or vehicles which require a special endorsement unless the proper endorsement appears on the license;

              (C)  Class C.  This license shall be issued and valid for the operation of any single vehicle with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.) of twenty-six thousand pounds (26,000 lbs.) or less Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.). This group applies to vehicles which are placarded for hazardous materials, designed to transport more than fifteen (15) passengers including the driver, or used as school buses. Persons holding a valid Class C license may operate vehicles in Class D but not in Classes A, B or M;

              (D)  Class D.  This license shall be issued and valid for the operation of any vehicle with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (G.V.W.R.) less than twenty-six thousand one pounds (26,001 lbs.), or any combination of vehicles with a Gross Combination Weight Rating (G.C.W.R.) less than twenty-six thousand one pounds (26,001 lbs.), except vehicles in Classes A, B, C or M or vehicles which require a special endorsement unless the proper endorsement appears on the license, and shall include enclosed motorcycles that weigh less than one thousand five hundred pounds (1,500 lbs.);

              (E)  Class H.  The department may issue this class license to a minor between fourteen (14) and sixteen (16) years of age. This special class license shall be restricted to the operation of a passenger car or other similar vehicle under Class D, a “motor-driven cycle,” or a “motorized bicycle” as defined in § 55-8-101. This class license shall be known as a hardship license or motor driven cycle license previously issued under the authority of former § 55-7-104(g)and(h). The use of this license shall be valid for use in daylight hours only and for travel to authorized locations as specified on an attachment and by any other restriction deemed appropriate by the department and set forth in administrative rules and regulations;

              (F)  Class M.  This license is valid for all motorcycles, including all motor-driven cycles. This license classification may be added to a license valid for any other class, or it may be issued as the only classification on a license if the applicant is not licensed for any other classification. A Class M-limited license may also be issued and is valid for all motor-driven cycles, including mopeds, but not for larger motorcycles;

              (G)  Class P.  This class license is issued as an instructional permit and shall be valid to permit the operator to drive a particular class of vehicle on an instructional basis only. A Class P license shall be issued only in conjunction with another class indicating the class of vehicle or vehicles which the operator is legally entitled to operate. The holder of a Class P license must be accompanied at all times by a parent, stepparent, guardian, or certified driving instructor who has been licensed in this state as a driver for the type or class of vehicle being used for at least one (1) year, who is at least twenty-one (21) years of age, and who is fit and capable of exercising physical control over the vehicle and who is occupying a seat beside the driver; provided, that such requirement does not apply to motorcycles;

                    (iClass P licenses will be issued to persons completing the appropriate application, paying the required fees, and successfully passing a vision and written examination for the appropriate class of license;

                    (iiApplicants for a Class P license must meet all requirements of the particular class license for which they are applying;

                    (iiiClass P licenses will be issued for classes of vehicle or vehicles as follows:

                         (aClass P-A. This is an instructional permit issued for Class A vehicles;

                         (bClass P-B. This is an instructional permit issued for Class B vehicles;

                         (cClass P-C. This is an instructional permit issued for Class C vehicles;

                         (dClass P-D. This is an instructional permit issued for Class D vehicles; and

                         (eClass P-M. This is an instructional permit issued for Class M vehicles;

                    (ivPersons issued a Class H or hardship license, who are at least fifteen (15) years of age, shall be extended the privileges provided above for persons issued a Class P-D license, when all provisions above are met;

         (21“Driver license endorsements” means special authorizations required to be displayed on a driver license which permit the driver to operate certain types of motor vehicles or motor vehicles hauling certain types of cargo:

              (A)  Multiple Trailer Endorsement.  This endorsement is required on a Class A license to permit the licensee to operate a vehicle authorized to pull more than one (1) trailer in accordance with chapter 7 of this title;

              (B)  Passenger Endorsement.  This endorsement is required on a Class A, B, or C license to permit the licensee to operate a vehicle designed to transport more than fifteen (15) passengers, including the driver;

              (C)  Cargo Tank Endorsement.  This endorsement is required on a Class A or C license to permit the licensee to operate a vehicle which is designed to transport, as its primary cargo, any liquid or gaseous material within a tank attached to the vehicle, such tank having a designed capacity of one thousand (1,000) gallons or more;

              (D)  Hazardous Material Endorsement.  This endorsement is required on any class license if the driver is operating a vehicle transporting a hazardous material that is required to be placarded under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act and by rules and regulations of the United States department of transportation;

              (E)  School Bus Endorsement.  This endorsement is required on any class license to permit the licensee to operate any vehicle being used as a school bus; and

              (F)  For-Hire Endorsement.  This endorsement is required to permit a licensee to operate a Class D vehicle as a chauffeur;

         (22“Employee” means an operator of a commercial motor vehicle, including an owner-operator or other independent contractor while in the course of operating a commercial motor vehicle, who is employed by an employer;

         (23“Employer” means any person, including the United States, a state, or a political subdivision of a state, who owns or leases a commercial motor vehicle or assigns employees to operate such

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-12 11:49 PM (#67792 - in reply to #67691)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont
    Originally written by Terri on 2007-09-11 7:04 PM

    I e-mailed a guy at the Tx DOT and he said it was the ACTUAL weight of the vehicle/trailer that counted, not what it was rated for.  I posted the e-mail on here a couple of years ago.  I may still have it.  

    I emailed the Trouper and asked him to look over this thread if he has the time and try to explain to us what the law really is.

     

    Well if you have an accident...the rules change...they want the manufacturer designated weights not the loaded weights from the bill of lading or the scaled weight of the vehicle...

    This is from a state accident explanation booklet...Your State may be different

    Gross Vehicle Rating: Record the applicable category for the single vehicle’s

    gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) or combination vehicle’s gross combination

    weight rating (GCWR). This information is found on the certification label located

    on the driver's door or door frame, cab behind the seat or driver-side visor. GVWR

    and GCWR are manufacturer designated weights, not the loaded weights from the

    bill of lading or the scaled weight of the vehicle. GCWR is the sum of all GVWR's

    for each unit in a combination-unit motor vehicle and should be used when

    recording the weight of qualifying combination vehicles. The use of GCWR to

    determine selection becomes especially important when vehicles that would NOT

    qualify by GVWR alone are involved in crashes when pulling a trailer. The label

    for trailers should be affixed to a location on the forward half of the left side

    Use gross combination weight ratings (GCWR) for truck combinations.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-12 11:56 PM (#67793 - in reply to #67786)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont
    Originally written by rose on 2007-09-12 11:17 PM

    Here in TN horses are still considered "livestock" so our trailer IS farm equipment.

    I saw somewhere that Iowa has classified horses as something other than livestock but do not know what that is or why.

     

    But the reason the ICC was invented was to stop one state from enforcing unreasonable rules on another states vehicles, i.e. if horses are livestock in TX, then when being transported thru Iowa by a TX truck and trailer its still livestock...same with the universal CDL...it is issued by a state, but is ultimately controlled by the Feds...i.e. Iowa can make it tougher for their issued license, but they can not enforce their rules over Texas CDLs passing thru Iowa...

    And

    in Keephaulin's case...she was hauling an RV that happens to have horses on board...

    Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-09-12 11:58 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-13 8:22 AM (#67806 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    Is Iowa encouraging people to pull with inadequate trucks in order to stay under the 26,001?

    Maybe I should put a gooseneck hitch on my Miata....just kidding.  Nah, just going to avoid Iowa.

    Hey Memory....what about those pop-up rv's......they don't have bathrooms.  Does that make them non-rv's?

     



    Edited by rose 2007-09-13 8:34 AM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-13 3:34 PM (#67826 - in reply to #67721)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico
    I finally got hold of someone from Tx. hwy patrol division commercial vehicle enforcement training unit that would/could explain this in english.  I don't have time now but I can post it here after I go get the kids.  If you want I can forward the e-mails to you so you can read them.

    Edited by Terri 2007-09-13 3:37 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Terri
    Reg. Jan 2004
    Posted 2007-09-14 11:52 AM (#67864 - in reply to #67826)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Expert


    Posts: 2828
    200050010010010025
    Location: Southern New Mexico

    This might be a bit confusing since the e-mails post the new messages above the old so you have to start at the bottom.  My messages are in red and the Sgt's messages are in blue.  The law is in black.

     

    Thank You!!!    

    xxxxxxx,xxxxxxxx wrote:

    Just to be clear for you, you only need a Class C license if you drive the combination you listed.

     

    xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx, Sergeant

    Texas Highway Patrol Division

    Commercial Vehicle Enforcement

    Training Unit

    Georgetown , Texas 


    From: xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxx
    Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:59 PM
    To:
    Subject: FW: FW: FW: Requests for information.

     

    Your combined rating is 22,800 lbs and that is well under the 26,001. The way it works is the combination is 26,001 or more and the trailer being towed behind the Truck is over 10,000.Then one would need a class A or a Class A CDL. Look at the definition of recreational vehicle,” primarily designed as living quarters” , the horse trailer/ camper may not fit that definition. It sounds as if you are good to go. The only problem you may have is if you were involved in rodeo as a business and were traveling interstate in that size combination.

     

     Sergeant

    Texas Highway Patrol Division

    Commercial Vehicle Enforcement

    Training Unit

    Georgetown , Texas


    From: Terri 
    Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:09 PM
    To: xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: FW: FW: Requests for information.

     

    The GVWR of my truck is 8800lbs.   There is no combined weight listed but if I add the 8800 max to the 14000 max for the trailer I am under the 26,000lb mark.  But the trailer is over 10,000lb listed in all the laws so would that require the CDL?

    I'm not a farmer/rancher.  We just have the horses so we can go out riding.   

    How about if my trailer has Living Quarters?  Would that fall under the camper exemption?

     

    And thank you so much for answering my quiestions.

    Terri

    xxxxxxxx,xxxxxxx wrote:

    Persons exempted from commercial driver's license (CDL) requirements are:

      (1) A person operating a vehicle that is controlled and operated by a farmer which is used to transport agricultural products, farm machinery, or farm supplies to or from a farm and which is not used in the operations of a common or contract carrier and used within 150 miles of the person's farm.

        (A) Under this exemption, a rancher is considered a farmer.

        (B) A farmer and his farmhands are equally exempt when the farmhands are in the employ of the farmer.

        (C) One who purchases a crop in a field and only harvests and transports the produce, but takes no part in the planting and cultivating of the product, is not considered a farmer.

        (D) One who purchases acres of growing timber and cultivates and harvests it over a period of months or years is considered a farmer.

      (2) A person operating a fire fighting or emergency vehicle necessary to the preservation of life or property or the execution of emergency governmental functions, whether operated by an employee of a political subdivision or by a volunteer fire fighter, or a fire fighter employed by a private company, for example, a refinery. This would not exempt operators of vehicles used by utility companies.

        (A) Drivers of industrial emergency response vehicles, including an industrial ambulance are exempt only if the vehicle is operated in compliance with criteria established by the Texas Industrial Fire Training Board or the State Firemen's and Fire Marshall's Association of Texas.

        (B) Drivers of public or private ambulances are exempt only if they have been issued a license by the Texas Department of Health.

        (C) Electric company employees repairing downed power lines are not exempt.

      (3) A person operating a military vehicle, when operated for military purposes by military personnel, members of the reserves and national guard on active duty (including personnel on full-time national guard duty), personnel on part-time training duty, and national guard military technicians. This exemption includes the operation of vehicles leased by the United States government for use by the military branches of government.

      (4) A person operating a vehicle that is a recreational vehicle that is driven for personal use.

        (A) For purposes of this exemption recreational vehicle means a vehicular type unit primarily designed as temporary living quarters for recreational camping or travel use that either has its own motive power or is mounted on or towed by another vehicle.

        (B) This exemption includes travel trailers, camping trailers, truck campers, and motor homes.

      (5) A person operating a vehicle that is owned, leased, or controlled by an air carrier, as defined by Texas Transportation Code, §21.155(d), and that is driven or operated exclusively by an employee of the air carrier only on the premises of an airport, as defined by Texas Transportation Code, §22.001(2), on service roads to which the public does not have access.

      (6) A person operating a vehicle used exclusively to transport seed cotton modules or cotton burrs.

     

    In reference to your question I think I can put everything in focus by saying everyone in Texas needs a CDL except the 6 persons above if they are driving a vehicle with the size requirements.

    If you are one of these guys, then you do not need a CDL in Texas , But you may need a Class A or B Drivers license if you are in a vehicle that has a weight rating that fits the definition.

    So if you are in a Truck with a rating of 13,000 lbs and your Trailer is 14,000 lbs GVWR then the total is 27,000 lbs you would need a
    Class A CDL or a Class A license. There are 6 exemption above for CDL. These 6 may still need the appropriate
    class of license (A,B) based on size.

    You can find the rating on the door post area of your truck and it sounds as if you already know the rating of your trailer.

    Look at number four. The person driving a large motor home doesn’t need a CDL because he is exempt under this law. The owner of the large motor home would still need a Class B license because he is over 26,001 GVWR. It is the same with number 2 (fireman operating a fire truck). These guys are exempt from CDL but they would still need a Class B license to drive the fire truck.

     Sergeant

    Texas Highway Patrol Division

    Commercial Vehicle Enforcement

    Training Unit

    Georgetown , Texas 


    From: Terri 
    Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 5:26 PM
    To: xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxx

    Subject: Re: FW: Requests for information.

     

    A CMV is a commercial motor vehicle?  

     

     Does this part mean I should have a CDL to tow my horses in my trailer since it has a GVWR of 14000.bs?   If I'm not in commerce why?

    And thank you

    Terri

     

     

     

     

    This is Texas law. There are some exemptions, and one doesn’t need to be in Commerce to be required a CDL in Texas .

      (a) Commercial motor vehicles (CMV) means a motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle:

      (1) has a gross combination weight rating (GCWR) of 26,001 or more pounds inclusive of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 10,000 pounds. In determining the GVWR of the towed unit, the weight of all vehicles being towed will be added together;

      (2) has a GVWR of 26,001 or more pounds;

      (3) is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or

      (4) is transporting hazardous materials and is required to be placarded in accordance with 49 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 172, Subpart F.

     

    From: Terri 
    Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2007 2:33 PM
    To: xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxx
    Subject: Re: Requests for information.

     

         There are a lot of questions about the DOT number/license requirements concerning horse trailers.  If you can go to the website link that I gave you it would give you an overview of the problems people are having and maybe you could explain them.  When I talked to the other officer a few years ago he said that as long as I was hauling my horses for personal use and didn't exceed any of the limits of my truck or trailer I was ok and didn't need a CDL because I wasn't commercial.  People are being pulled over and ticketed because the vehicles POSSIBLE capacity, not because of the actual weights. 

          There have been tickets for not having a CDL, no dot numbers and no logbooks given to people who, buy what I have been told, don't need them.  I don't understand where the "line" is.

     

         I have a 3/4 ton truck with a GVWR of 8800 (no CGVWR listed) and my trailer has a GVWR of 14000.  Even though I'm under the 26000lb mark, my trailer is rated for over 10,000lbs and people have been getting tickets for no CDL with this set up.

         I'm trying to find out about this since we like to go trail riding in different areas and my daughter is showing in 4-H this year.  I don't want to have any problems getting to and from the rides or show.

    Thank you

    Terri

    " xxxxxxxx, xxxxxxx"  wrote:

    Sgt. xxxxxxxx is correct, in the fact that I have taken over answering question that come in to the Motor Carrier Bureau. I can help you with a question you may have or I can find an answer for you if I am not knowledgeable about a topic. If you have a particular question relating to the Federal Regulations just email me or submit through The Department of Public Safety public information office.

     

     Sergeant

    Texas Highway Patrol Division

    Commercial Vehicle Enforcement

    Training Unit

    Georgetown, Texas 



    Edited by Terri 2007-09-14 11:58 AM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-14 1:22 PM (#67868 - in reply to #67864)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    BROTHER!

     You can see how getting each state to change its' regs for recreational horse hauling is going to be one more pain in the rear,not to mention unlikely.

    I think the FED regs need the exceptions,since they are the standard that most states go by anyway.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-14 2:12 PM (#67871 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    My trailer IS an rv which also can transport horses;  there is a sticker on the outside that says it is certified by TA Arnold rv stuff etc.  The lq part is bigger than the horse part. 

    I don't believe any of the people driving those big rv bus creatures has anything more than a regular (in TN that would be a class D) driving license.

    AND when I tagged the dually, nobody said anything about it needing any kind of "special" tag because it is big. 

    What is next, every one ton truck has to be driven by someone holding a cdl?  This is a load of crap. 

    So, how about it people who live in Iowa, do all of you who have duallys also have cdls?

    AND I am still interested in what Iowa wants concerning horses....

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    dblhocker
    Reg. Jan 2006
    Posted 2007-09-14 2:23 PM (#67872 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 51
    2525
    Location: Grundy Center, IA
    I live in Iowa, have a dually, and do not have a CDL. However, my dually is an older one (year 2000) so the GVW is only 9600 lbs. My trailer's GVW is 14,000, so I'm under the 26,001 lb. threshhold, and I will always claim to be coming from or going to a trail ride. When I upgrade trucks, I will be very careful not to buy one with a GVW of more than 12,000 if the current laws stay the same, or there is no clarification that comes down the pike.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-14 3:00 PM (#67874 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    dblhocker    Thanks for the message.  I have been looking up (or trying to) the Iowas statutes.  I found the following:

    717.1 Definitions.
    As used in this chapter, unless the context otherwise requires:
    1. "Law enforcement officer" means a regularly employed member of a police force of a city or county, including a sheriff, who is responsible for the prevention and detection of crime and the enforcement of the criminal laws of this state.
    2. "Livestock" means an animal belonging to the bovine, caprine, equine, ovine, or porcine species, ostriches, rheas, emus; farm deer as defined in section 170.1 ; or poultry.
    3. "Livestock care provider" means a person designated by a local authority to provide care to livestock which is rescued by the local authority pursuant to section 717.2A .
    4. "Local authority" means a city as defined in section 362.2 or a county as provided in chapter 331 .
    5. "Maintenance" means to provide on–site or off–site care to neglected livestock.
    6. "Sustenance" means food, water, or a nutritional formulation customarily used in the production of livestock.
    [C51, §2678; R60, §4318; C73, §3977; C97, §4818; C24, 27, 31, 35, 39, § 13132; C46, 50, 54, 58, 62, 66, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, §717.1]
    94 Acts, ch 1103, §7; 95 Acts, ch 43, §14; 95 Acts, ch 134, §6; 2003 Acts, ch 149, §21, 23
     
    Anyway, most of the horse laws in Iowa relate to horse racing, gambling, drugging of race horses and so on.   As yet I have not been able to find the driver license stuff except for the graduated license provisions relating to interim licenses starting at age 14, and requiring drivers ed.
     
    keeponhaulin'   What is happening with your ticket situation?


    Edited by rose 2007-09-14 3:08 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-14 3:19 PM (#67876 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    ok I just found the following in the Iowa stuff (in the process of still trying to find the driver license stuff)

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-14 5:53 PM (#67886 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    Private passenger vehicles are covered under the Tennessee Code as follows:

    55-4-103. Registration plates furnished by department — Form and contents — Size. —

    (aThe department shall likewise furnish to the county clerks of the various counties of the state all registration plates of all types which may be required by the county clerks in the exercise of the duties in subdivision (b)(1) imposed upon them.

    (b(1Every registration plate shall have displayed upon it, in addition to a registration number, the year in which it expires and the abbreviation of the word, “Tennessee,” and if the registration plate is issued for any type of vehicle other than a privately owned passenger vehicle not operated for hire, some symbol, or word, indicating the type vehicle for which the plate was originally issued. Registration plates shall bear individual distinctive alpha-numerical characters not to exceed a combination of six (6) as determined by the commissioner.

         (2Registration plates shall be designed in such a manner as determined by the commissioner as will permit the display of validation or re-validation tabs, stickers, or other devices as provided in § 55-4-104(d), and registration plates shall also be designed in such a manner as determined by the commissioner as will permit thereon, and which is hereby required, the display of county and/or municipal wheel tax tabs, stickers, or other devices evidencing payment of wheel or road taxes heretofore or hereafter enacted by the respective county and/or municipality of Tennessee.

         (3Any county and/or municipal law or ordinance relative to the display of such tabs, stickers, or other devices which may be required as evidence of the payment of wheel or road taxes, and which should be in conflict with the provisions of this section are hereby repealed and held void. Wheel tax records shall be maintained by the county clerk for the same period of time as registration records prior to disposition.

         (4Registration plates shall also be designed in such a manner to require the display of tabs, stickers or devices on plates to be issued for a private passenger vehicle, which tabs, stickers or devices shall specify the name of the county of issue. The characters of the name of the county shall in no event be smaller than the characters of the words “Volunteer State” which now appear on registration plates. The area for the display of the county shall be below and parallel to the alpha-numerical legend as provided in subdivision (b)(1). Such tabs, stickers or devices shall be issued at the time of the issuance of the registration plates as required by this chapter and subsection (i) and displayed on the registration plates in a manner to be determined by the commissioner.

    (cSuch registration plate or plates and the required numerals thereon, except the year number for which issued, shall be of sufficient size to be readable from a distance of one hundred feet (100") during daylight.

    (dThe provisions of this section shall apply to and include any mobile home or house trailer.

    (eThe requirement in this section for displaying the year of issue on a plate may be removed with respect to those plates issued under the provisions of a registration which does not require annual renewal.

    (f(1To promote highway safety and increase visibility and legibility on registration plates, the same shall be fully reflectorized. The commissioner has the authority to establish specifications covering reflectorization.

         (2In addition to the fee imposed in subdivision (f)(3) and in addition to all other motor vehicle registration fees prescribed by law, there shall be paid to the department the additional fee of seventy-five cents (75") at the time of the issuance of registration plates or the renewal thereof.

         (3In addition to all other motor vehicle registration fees prescribed by law, there shall be paid to the department the additional sum of one dollar ($1.00) at the time of the issuance of registration plates or the renewal thereof.

    (gWhen any plate becomes so mutilated or effaced as to no longer meet the requirements of the law, the holder shall apply to the department for suitable replacement. The commissioner is authorized to promulgate such rules and regulations as may be necessary to provide for the replacement of lost or destroyed plates and to collect a fee of ten dollars ($10.00) for each application.

    (hCommencing January 1, 2006, and on each fifth anniversary thereafter, the commissioner shall cause to be reissued a new registration plate of such design as directed by the commissioner consistent with the terms, conditions and provisions of this section and this chapter. No such new registration plates shall be issued prior to January 1, 2006; provided, however, that the issue of the new registration plates on January 1, 2006, and any subsequent fifth anniversaries shall be deferred to a later January 1 if funds for the reissue of the registration plates are not appropriated specifically in the general appropriations act.

    (iCounty residents who purchase a vehicle out of their county of residence shall receive a county name strip from the county clerk of their county of residence upon proof of proper registration and payment of any county wheel tax or other applicable county fees.

    [Acts 1951, ch. 70, § 64 (Williams, § 5538.164); impl. am. Acts 1959, ch. 9, § 14; Acts 1963, ch. 143, § 6; 1967, ch. 122, § 2; 1969, ch. 334, § 1; 1970, ch. 499, § 1; 1971, ch. 12, § 1; 1972, ch. 742, § 1; 1974, ch. 668, § 1; 1975, ch. 98, § 1; 1975, ch. 357, § 1; 1977, ch. 39, § 1; impl. am. Acts 1978, ch. 934, §§ 22, 36; T.C.A. (orig. ed.), § 59-403; Acts 1986, ch. 816, §§ 1-4; 1987, ch. 321, § 1; 1988, ch. 710, § 1; 1988, ch. 971, § 1; 1990, ch. 716, § 1; 1991, ch. 90, § 1; 1991, ch. 405, § 1; 1996, ch. 687, § 3; 1997, ch. 251, § 1; 1997, ch. 538, § 1; 2003, ch. 355, § 17; 2004, ch. 481, §§ 1-3.]

    <form name=LPHitCountForm>

     

    <script type=text/javascript> // Hit Tracker - object for moving between hit anchors in a document//// Features:// * No FolioHitCount form is needed.// * First hit doesn't have to be LPHit1.// * Detects some binary documents.// * Works around IE 5.5 bug changing location.hash in XML.// constantsvar hit_prefix = "LPHit";// constructorfunction HitTracker(document_window){ // public this.prevMatch = HitTracker_prevMatch; // Move to previous match. Returns false if at first. this.nextMatch = HitTracker_nextMatch; // Move to next match. Returns false if at last. this.isTracking = HitTracker_isTracking; // Able to track hits on this document? // private this.construct = HitTracker_construct; this.checkState = HitTracker_checkState; this.moveToAnchor = HitTracker_moveToAnchor; this.document_window = null; this.document_object = null; this.first_match = null; this.current_match = null; this.total_matches = null; this.total_anchors = null; this.pathname = null;}// public methodsfunction HitTracker_prevMatch(document_window){ var ok = false; this.checkState(document_window); if (this.document_object != null) { if (this.current_match -1 >= this.first_match) { this.moveToAnchor(hit_prefix + (--this.current_match)); ok = true; } } return ok;}function HitTracker_nextMatch(document_window){ var ok = false; this.checkState(document_window); if (this.document_object != null) { if (this.current_match + 1 <= this.total_matches) { this.moveToAnchor(hit_prefix + (++this.current_match)); ok = true; } } return ok;}function HitTracker_isTracking(document_window){ // Is this a document that the browser renders natively, or is a // plug-in/activex involved? If this is a non-native document, we // can't do anything about navigating hits. this.checkState(document_window); return this.document_object != null;}// private methodsfunction HitTracker_construct(document_window){ this.document_window = document_window; this.document_object = document_window.document; this.first_match = HitTracker_getFirstMatch(document_window.document); this.current_match = this.first_match; this.total_matches = HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_window.document) - (this.first_match - 1); this.total_anchors = document_window.document.anchors.length; this.pathname = document_window.location.pathname;// alert("Construct: first=" + this.first_match + " current=" + this.current_match + " total=" + this.total_matches); }function HitTracker_checkState(document_window){ if (HitTracker_isTrackableDocument(document_window)) { if (document_window.location.pathname != this.pathname) { this.construct(document_window); } else if (this.total_anchors != document_window.document.anchors.length) { // in case they moved to a different match before the document finished loading this.total_matches = HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_window.document) - (this.first_match - 1); this.total_anchors = document_window.document.anchors.length; } } else { this.document_object = null; }}function HitTracker_moveToAnchor(anchor){ this.document_window.location.hash = anchor; if (this.document_window.location.hash != anchor) { // work around IE 5.5 bug if (-1 != navigator.appVersion.indexOf("MSIE 5.5")) { for (var a = 0; a < this.document_window.document.anchors.length; a++) { if (this.document_window.document.anchors[a].name == anchor) { this.document_window.document.anchors[a].scrollIntoView(); break; } } } }}// static methodsfunction HitTracker_getFirstMatch(document_object){ var first_match = 1; for (var a = 0; a < document_object.anchors.length; a++) { if (document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(0, hit_prefix.length) == hit_prefix) { first_match = parseInt(document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(hit_prefix.length)); break; } } return first_match;}function HitTracker_getTotalMatches(document_object){ var total_matches = 0; for (var a = 0; a < document_object.anchors.length; a++) { if (document_object.anchors[a].name.substring(0, hit_prefix.length) == hit_prefix) { total_matches++; } } return total_matches;}function HitTracker_isTrackableDocument(document_window){ // Windows containing MS Office documents do not have a window.document property. Any // attempt to reference it or detect its presence will result in a JavaScript runtime // error. So we'll do our best to detect it. var doc_ok = true; // try to determine if this is an office document by checking the file extension var path = document_window.location.pathname; var ext_index = path.lastIndexOf("."); if (ext_index != -1) { var ext = path.substring(ext_index); if (ext == ".doc" || ext == ".pdf" || ext == ".xls" || ext == ".ppt") { doc_ok = false; } } return doc_ok;}function HitTracker_handleError(message, url, line) { alert("Error: " + message + "\nLocation: " + url + "\nLine: " + line); return true; } var use_viewer = "Please use the document's viewer to navigate hits.";function getDocumentWindow() { if (top.main == null) { return top; } // top.main exists if (top.main.doc == null) { return top.main; } // top.main.doc exists return top.main.doc;}function getScriptName(){ var path = location.pathname; path = path.substring(0, path.indexOf('.') + 4); return path;}function getCookie(cookie_name) { var cookie = document.cookie; var script_cookie_name = getScriptName() + "/" + cookie_name; script_cookie_name = script_cookie_name.substring(1); var index = cookie.indexOf(script_cookie_name + "="); if (-1 == index) { return ""; } index = cookie.indexOf("=", index); if (-1 == index) { return ""; } var endstr = cookie.indexOf(";", index); if (-1 == endstr) { endstr = cookie.length; } var cookie_value = unescape(cookie.substring(index + 1, endstr)); if (cookie_value == null || cookie_value == "null" || cookie_value == "" || cookie_value.indexOf("undefined") >= 0 || cookie_value.lastIndexOf("=") == cookie_value.length - 1) { cookie_value = ""; } return cookie_value;}function doClearQuery(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + '?f=hitlist&t=' + redirect_template + '&c=redirect&q='; top.docnav.window.location.reload(true);}function doHideResults(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + "?f=hitlist&c=curr"; top.docnav.update();}function doCloseResultWindow(redirect_template){ parent.window.location = location.pathname + "?f=templates&fn=document-frame.htm"; top.docnav.update();}function getFrameWindow(frame_name){ var frame_window = null; if(frame_name == "_self") { return window; } if (frame_name != null && frame_name.length > 0) { frame_window = parent.frames[frame_name] } else { frame_window = window; } return frame_window;}function displayQueryResults() { top.main.location.href = getScriptName() + '?f=templates&fn=main-hit-h.htm';}function doPrevNextHit(prev){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (!hit_tracker.isTracking(doc_window)) { alert(use_viewer); } else { if (prev) { if (!hit_tracker.prevMatch(doc_window)) { if (confirm("There are no more hits in this document.\nMove to the previous document with hits?")) { doPrevHitDoc(); } } } else { if (!hit_tracker.nextMatch(doc_window)) { if (confirm("There are no more hits in this document.\nMove to the next document with hits?")) { doNextHitDoc(); } } } } return false;}function doPrevHit(){ doPrevNextHit(true);}function doNextHit(){ doPrevNextHit(false);}function doPrevDoc(document_frame_name, template){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=Prevdoc&t=' + template + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000); }}function doNextDoc(document_frame_name, template){ // var doc_window = getFrameWindow(document_frame_name); var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=Nextdoc&t=' + template + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000); }}function doPrevHitDoc(document_frame_name){ var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { if (doc_window.isHitListStart != null && doc_window.isHitListStart == 1) { // it is already at the hitListStart, do nothing } else { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=hitlist&c=prev&gh=1' + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#LPHit1'; } }}function doNextHitDoc(document_frame_name){ var doc_window = getDocumentWindow(); if (doc_window != null) { if (doc_window.isHitListEnd != null && doc_window.isHitListEnd == 1) { // it is already at the hitListEnd, do nothing } else { doc_window.location = getScriptName() + '?f=hitlist&c=next&gh=1' + '&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#LPHit1'; } }}function doSynchronizeContents(contents_frame_name, contents_frame_url){ var current_document = escape(getCookie("doc")); // whack any leading slash character var index = current_document.indexOf("/"); if (index == 0) { current_document = current_document.substring(1); } var contents_window = getFrameWindow(contents_frame_name); if (contents_window != null) { if (contents_window.document.JTOC == null) { var url = contents_frame_url + '&cp=' + current_document + '&c=100&sync=2&cache=' + Math.round(Math.random() * 10000) + '#TOCSYNC'; contents_window.location.href = url; } else { if(contents_window.document.JTOC != null) { contents_window.document.JTOC.syncTOC(current_document); } else if(contents_frame_url != null) { contents_window.location = contents_frame_url; } } }}function doReference(template){ var ref_window = window.open(template, "Reference", "width=500,height=175,resizable=yes,scrollbars=yes,toolbar=no,location=no,directories=no,status=no,menubar=no"); if (_js_ >= 1.1) { ref_window.focus(); }}function viewSearchForm(search_form_params, toc_template, no_toc_template, options){ // search_form_params looks like this: // frame-type:search-form-id if (search_form_params != "#NoForm") { var delim_offset = search_form_params.indexOf(":"); if (delim_offset != -1) { var frame_type = search_form_params.substring(0, delim_offset); var search_form_id = search_form_params.substring(delim_offset+1); var component; switch (frame_type) { case "contents": component = "?f=templates&fn=" + toc_template; component = "?f=templates&fn=" + no_toc_template; break; case "no-contents": component = "?f=templates&fn=" + no_toc_template; break; default: component = "?f=searchforms"; break; } parent.main.window.location = getScriptName() + component + "&id=" + search_form_id + "&" + options; } }}function getInfobaseName(contentPath){ if (contentPath == null || contentPath == "") { return null; } var cp = contentPath; if (cp[0] == '/') { cp = cp.substring(1); } if (cp == null || cp == "") { return null; } var i = cp.indexOf('/'); if (i < 0) { return cp; } return cp.substring(0, i);}

     

     

    previous documentnext document
    <script language=JavaScript>//JavaScript at boottom to catch correct document referencefunction sendEmail(){ var hostServer = location.hostname; documentPath=escape(getCookie("doc")); if (documentPath == null || documentPath.length == 0 || hostServer == null) return; documentURL="http://" + hostServer +"/tennessee/lpExt.dll?f=templates&eMail=Y&fn=main-h.htm&cp="+documentPath; emailTo=""; emailSubject="Michie's Legal Resource Link"; emailBody="\n\n" + documentURL; emailURL = "mailto:" + escape(emailTo) + "?subject=" + escape(emailSubject) + "&body=" + escape(emailBody); window.location = emailURL;}



    Edited by rose 2007-09-14 5:56 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Kansashoss
    Reg. Aug 2005
    Posted 2007-09-14 6:21 PM (#67888 - in reply to #67784)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 48
    25
    Location: Kansas

    Originally written by memory on 2007-09-12 10:04 PM

    My dealer told me that if I put in a shower and tolet, I can register my trailer as an RV in Iowa. His is.

    That is how it is in Kansas.  My 2003 Titan 16' GN is registered as an RV.  It has a camp potty, bag shower & Crown Royal. 

    For those saying "I'll tell them I'm going to a trail ride" I wonder if you need to be careful because if you have a health certificate, which you should when going out of state, and if the Iowa officer ask to see that document, it will show something different: roping, show.

    I've driven I-29 for several years going up to South Dakota.  It is the most neglected and unattended stretch of interstate I've ever seen with original to Lewis & Clark era road surface and the midwest's tallest weeds. 

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    BigT
    Reg. Oct 2003
    Posted 2007-09-14 8:30 PM (#67894 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Extreme Veteran


    Posts: 402
    100100100100
    Location: Lockport, Illinois

    This is how the CDL was explained to me by an Illinois State Trooper.  It doesn't matter what axles you have or what the weight of the trailer on a scale, the CLD requirement of 26,001 is the combination GVWR of the towing veichle and the GVWR of the trailer.  I have a trailer with two 8,000 axles but it has a GVWR tag from the manufacture of 19,600, their thinking that 20% of the trailer weight will put on the towing veichle. The F-350 has a GVWR of 11,800, which put the GVWR of 31,400.


    So if the trailer manufactures add 20% to the axles capacity, two 7,000 axles have a combined capacity of 14,000, adding on the 20% of the weight that the truck carries, that makes a GVWR of 16,800, leaving only 9,200 left for the GVWR of the truck, a 2007 Ford F-350 Crew Cab Dually has a GVWR of 13,000. So if you have a dually towing a trailer with two 7,000 axles you willl need a CDL. It seems that the trailer manufactures and truck manufactures are increasing the GVWR to make it seem that we are getting more for your money, but they are creating veichles that will require a CDL.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-14 9:16 PM (#67895 - in reply to #67871)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    Originally written by rose on 2007-09-14 2:12 PM

    I don't believe any of the people driving those big rv bus creatures has anything more than a regular (in TN that would be a class D) driving license.

    AND when I tagged the dually, nobody said anything about it needing any kind of "special" tag because it is big. 

    What is next, every one ton truck has to be driven by someone holding a cdl?  This is a load of crap. 

    THAT'S for sure!!!

    This may offend police officers,but I don't mean to.I have utmost respect for police officers and always have.I just don't see why they (meaning not necessarily them,but their superiors,those lawmakers who come up with these stupid laws and insist they be applied in SOME WAY to every one,ect)can't focus on some real live criminals such as drug trafficers,instead of people trying to do right and enjoy themselves.You know???



    Edited by crowleysridgegirl 2007-09-14 9:17 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    horsey1
    Reg. Dec 2004
    Posted 2007-09-15 8:11 AM (#67914 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Elite Veteran


    Posts: 720
    500100100
    GVWRs are bumped up high, because it is also entirely possible to be ticketed for being overweight... This low GVWR some speak of getting re-tagged for can get you in trouble on the other end.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    aegnc
    Reg. Sep 2007
    Posted 2007-09-15 12:00 PM (#67927 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 13

    Location: texas
    Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't make any sense to me why a trailer would have a GVWR greater than the sum of the axle ratings (other than to make it seem like you're getting more trailer than you have).  The reason I think this way is because any weight on the gooseneck of the trailer gets applied to the truck, not the trailer.  When a rig is scaled, the truck axles must fall within the GVWR of the truck (this weight includes the empty truck, all of its contents, and the weight of the trailer gooseneck).  The trailer weight that is measured when scaled is the combined trailer axle weight.  If the GVWR of the trailer is greater than the sum of the axle ratings, then you have GVWR that you can't use, but end up paying for in increased registration fees and potentially pushing you over 26000 lbs.  Basically the extra weight is being double bookkept.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-15 1:33 PM (#67932 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    EXCEPT these are recreational vehicles privately owned for the owners' personal enjoyment.  Just like the huge rv buses pulling tag along horse trailers, boats, cars, trailers with 4 wheelers or motocycles or whatever.

    If Iowa thinks horses are worth so many $$$$, maybe they need to go to the claiming races at their own racetracks.  Or maybe that is the problem, Iowa thinks all horses are racehorses.............

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    hav2ride
    Reg. Oct 2003
    Posted 2007-09-15 4:42 PM (#67941 - in reply to #67932)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 1719
    1000500100100
    Location: PA
    Maybe some of these states that are penalizing horse owners will wake up when we stop driving thru and STOPPING FOR FUEL!! Maybe the fuel stations should put some pressure on the DOTs.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    cowgirldi34
    Reg. Jan 2006
    Posted 2007-09-15 7:20 PM (#67949 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 93
    252525
    Location: Cherokee, Ia
    Hey! Just because some highway dick gave out some stupid tickets, don't hold it against all of us Iowans!! I'm not sure what went on, that the person(s) got tickets, but I have hauled through this state for the past 20 years, never had a problem. No we DON'T think that all horses are racehorses, c'mon, we need to get ahold of the politicians or whoever writes up these crazy laws, regs. etc. Don't blame the people of Iowa, just because the cops have to "meet their quota" I hope the person who got pulled over fights this ticket, somehow, I know it would be a pain to have to show up in court, but guess I would probably do it to prove my point!
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-15 7:55 PM (#67953 - in reply to #67927)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont

    Originally written by aegnc on 2007-09-15 1:00 PM

    Maybe I'm missing something, but it doesn't make any sense to me why a trailer would have a GVWR greater than the sum of the axle ratings (other than to make it seem like you're getting more trailer than you have).  The reason I think this way is because any weight on the gooseneck of the trailer gets applied to the truck, not the trailer.  When a rig is scaled, the truck axles must fall within the GVWR of the truck (this weight includes the empty truck, all of its contents, and the weight of the trailer gooseneck).  The trailer weight that is measured when scaled is the combined trailer axle weight.  If the GVWR of the trailer is greater than the sum of the axle ratings, then you have GVWR that you can't use, but end up paying for in increased registration fees and potentially pushing you over 26000 lbs.  Basically the extra weight is being double bookkept.

    You forgot the PIN WEIGHT....

    Trailers are GVWR  = (GAWR * # of AXLES) + PIN WEIGHT



    Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-09-15 7:57 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    keeponhaulin'
    Reg. Aug 2007
    Posted 2007-09-19 1:50 PM (#68106 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 38
    25
    Location: texas
    Happy Wednesday All,  Had to go out of town over the weekend.  I don't know much more on this issue.  What I have been told concerning the tickets is, I need to get my CDL before Sept. 29, 2007 to get the tickets dismissed. The tickets are due on that date.  No offense to people from Iowa, but your government officials are not so helpful.  Gonna keep trying, let y'all know something when I do.
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-20 7:22 AM (#68145 - in reply to #68106)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    Originally written by keeponhaulin' on 2007-09-19 1:50 PM

      No offense to people from Iowa, but your government officials are not so helpful.  Gonna keep trying, let y'all know something when I do.

    H--- Na,there's $$ in it for them.

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    mnhunter
    Reg. Apr 2006
    Posted 2007-09-20 1:45 PM (#68175 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 32
    25
    Location: chatfield mn

    I realize Im a little late to this thread, but have been away for a while.  I deal with commercial vehicles on a regular so will try to offer some insight.  The origional poster was most likely stopped to investigate weather or not it was a commercial vehicle.  It may appear as if smaller rigs are being picked on but I think that over the years the larger rigs have been coming into compliance and now the DOT are working their way down and also making the smaller rigs conform to the regulations.  If I inspect a smaller rig, it is not uncommon to find 12-15 violations.  This makes some of them some of the worst violators.  The origional poster said they were not aware they had to comply with the com veh regs.  Im not sure if they handle their trips as a business, or strictly recreational.  I find that some horse owners want to claim all expenses as a business deduction, but when stopped claim they are not a business.  Yes, as some people suggest here, you can just lie to the officer, but someday you may find one that may not believe you.  Or if you are truely a business, you can comply with the regulations. 

    These are federal regulation, and are the same in every state in the country.  They apply if you are crossing state lines for commercial purposes.  When you read the regs., remember there are 2 definitions of a commercial veh.  1 is in part 383 which deals with drivers licenses and the other is in part 390 which deals with everything else.  390 says any veh or combination over 10,000 is a com veh.

    The reason gvwr is used for weight determination is because not every inspector has scales to weigh the vehs.  Otherwise you may be ok without a load, but not loaded.  If some are thinking about removing the vin sticker with the mfg gvwr I believe this is also a violation.  Also think how you are now going to prove that that trailer is really yours as the lic plate could have come from anything, but you have just removed the vin number

    As for putting rv plates on the trailer, it really doesnt mean anything.  It is the use of the vehicles, not the registration on them that determines weather it is a com veh.  The feds dont care what lic plates the states sell to you. 

    Not For Hire.  This is a red flag that to me means that you know there are regulaltions out there but you dont think you should have to comply with them.

    As far as myself, I haul horses over several states to trail ride every year and havent had a problem yet.  Im lucky as i know the regulations and would be happy to clarify fed regs to amyone that wants to pm me.  Now if anyone wants to talk about trying to figure out brand inspections, but thats another subject.

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-20 3:49 PM (#68182 - in reply to #68175)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    Originally written by mnhunter on 2007-09-20 1:45 PM

     If I inspect a smaller rig, it is not uncommon to find 12-15 violations.  As far as myself, I haul horses over several states to trail ride every year and havent had a problem yet. 

    Might be because you're one of "them."

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    rose
    Reg. Feb 2004
    Posted 2007-09-20 4:50 PM (#68187 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    10005001002525
    Location: KY

    mnhunter

    ANY vehicle (or combo) over 10,000 pounds is NOT a commercial vehicle.  Recreational vehicles are clearly excepted.  That is why all the people over who knows what age can drive those huge RV buses and pull anything they want behind them and they are not cdl/medical card qualified.

    AND I can assure you that I do not need a cdl to drive my dually to the grocery store !



    Edited by rose 2007-09-20 10:01 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    ggrimm01
    Reg. Aug 2005
    Posted 2007-09-20 10:06 PM (#68200 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Regular


    Posts: 95
    252525
    Location: East Central Kansas

    If I ever get pulled over by the law enforcement community my story goes I am going to/from a trail ride in my rv.  Thats my story and I am sticking to it. 

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-20 10:26 PM (#68201 - in reply to #68175)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont
    Originally written by mnhunter on 2007-09-20 2:45 PM

    I realize Im a little late to this thread, but have been away for a while.  I deal with commercial vehicles on a regular so will try to offer some insight.  The origional poster was most likely stopped to investigate weather or not it was a commercial vehicle.  It may appear as if smaller rigs are being picked on but I think that over the years the larger rigs have been coming into compliance and now the DOT are working their way down and also making the smaller rigs conform to the regulations.  If I inspect a smaller rig, it is not uncommon to find 12-15 violations.  This makes some of them some of the worst violators.  The origional poster said they were not aware they had to comply with the com veh regs.  Im not sure if they handle their trips as a business, or strictly recreational.  I find that some horse owners want to claim all expenses as a business deduction, but when stopped claim they are not a business.  Yes, as some people suggest here, you can just lie to the officer, but someday you may find one that may not believe you.  Or if you are truely a business, you can comply with the regulations. 

    These are federal regulation, and are the same in every state in the country.  They apply if you are crossing state lines for commercial purposes.  When you read the regs., remember there are 2 definitions of a commercial veh.  1 is in part 383 which deals with drivers licenses and the other is in part 390 which deals with everything else.  390 says any veh or combination over 10,000 is a com veh.

    The reason gvwr is used for weight determination is because not every inspector has scales to weigh the vehs.  Otherwise you may be ok without a load, but not loaded.  If some are thinking about removing the vin sticker with the mfg gvwr I believe this is also a violation.  Also think how you are now going to prove that that trailer is really yours as the lic plate could have come from anything, but you have just removed the vin number

    As for putting rv plates on the trailer, it really doesnt mean anything.  It is the use of the vehicles, not the registration on them that determines weather it is a com veh.  The feds dont care what lic plates the states sell to you. 

    Not For Hire.  This is a red flag that to me means that you know there are regulaltions out there but you dont think you should have to comply with them.

    As far as myself, I haul horses over several states to trail ride every year and havent had a problem yet.  Im lucky as i know the regulations and would be happy to clarify fed regs to amyone that wants to pm me.  Now if anyone wants to talk about trying to figure out brand inspections, but thats another subject.

     

    Well then you need a refresher course...

    Sec. 390.3 General applicability.

    (f) Exceptions. Unless otherwise specifically provided, the rules in
    this subchapter do not apply to--

    (3) The occasional transportation of personal property by
    individuals not for compensation nor in the furtherance of a commercial
    enterprise;

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    mnhunter
    Reg. Apr 2006
    Posted 2007-09-21 9:20 AM (#68214 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Member


    Posts: 32
    25
    Location: chatfield mn
    Yes I am one of them and was just trying to clear up a few things.  I wasnt trying to say all vehs over 10,000 lbs are com vehs, only those being used for business purposes.  As far as RVs go, they are exempt unless they are being used for business, then the same rules would apply. For example if you are in the horse business and are pulling a bumper pull trailer with a 30 foot motorhome and that trip is for business, then that combination would be a commercial vehicle regardless of the type of license plates on the motorhome.  If you are using your motorhome to go from differant locations to sell stuff at horse shows and deduct your expenses for that rv, then that rv is a commercial vehicle if it has a GVWR over 10,000 lbs.  Once again, these are federal laws and may not apply if you stay in your home state. 
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-21 12:08 PM (#68223 - in reply to #68214)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100
    If the laws are that defined and clear,why is everybody getting so confused over them?
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-21 12:53 PM (#68226 - in reply to #68223)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont

    Originally written by crowleysridgegirl on 2007-09-21 1:08 PM

    If the laws are that defined and clear,why is everybody getting so confused over them?

    Because the enforcers...never seem to read the EXCEPTIONS...

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    PaulChristenson
    Reg. Jan 2007
    Posted 2007-09-21 1:05 PM (#68228 - in reply to #68214)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 3853
    200010005001001001002525
    Location: Vermont

    Originally written by mnhunter on 2007-09-21 10:20 AM

    Yes I am one of them and was just trying to clear up a few things.  I wasnt trying to say all vehs over 10,000 lbs are com vehs, only those being used for business purposes.  As far as RVs go, they are exempt unless they are being used for business, then the same rules would apply. For example if you are in the horse business and are pulling a bumper pull trailer with a 30 foot motorhome and that trip is for business, then that combination would be a commercial vehicle regardless of the type of license plates on the motorhome.  If you are using your motorhome to go from differant locations to sell stuff at horse shows and deduct your expenses for that rv, then that rv is a commercial vehicle if it has a GVWR over 10,000 lbs.  Once again, these are federal laws and may not apply if you stay in your home state. 

    BUT HOW DO YOU KNOW IT IS BEING USED FOR BUSINESS???

    A judge would say you are on a fishing expedition...if you stopped a large trailer without PROBABLE CAUSE...

    OOOPS...I forgot HOMELAND SECURITY means our rights are now subjugated to THE STATE...



    Edited by PaulChristenson 2007-09-21 1:09 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-21 1:22 PM (#68230 - in reply to #68228)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    True,very true!!!

    If they did a search,because people were known to be hauling drugs around by the tons in vehicles of this kind,it might be a LITTLE more understandable.

    Bad when you have to bone up on the laws to protect yourself from the excessive use of them!!!

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    Trailer guy
    Reg. Aug 2004
    Posted 2007-09-21 1:44 PM (#68231 - in reply to #66684)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa




    2525
    Location: Oklahoma
    IT IS PAINFULLY APPARENT SOME PEOPLE SPEND WAY TO MUCH TIME WATCHING "LAW & ORDER"   WHY WOULD YOU TURN A THREAD ABOUT TRAILERS INTO A FEABLE ATTEMPT TO EXPRESS YOUR UNSOLICITED VIEWS REGARDING POLITICS?   UNLESS YOU HAVE SERVED TIME PROTECTING(WHICH I  DOUBT) OUR HOME LAND  PLEASE KEEP YOUR VIEWS OFF THIS WEB SITE.  THE FACT THAT YOU(CROWLEYRIDGEGIRL) OR WHAT EVER  YOU NAME IS HAVE THE FREEDOM TO TRAVEL ACROSS THIS LAND PULLING A TRAILER IS SOMETHING YOU SHOULD NOT TAKE FOR GRANTED.  I'M SURE BOTH YOU AND PAUL WERE BUSY ENJOYING YOU LIBERTYS ON 9-11.  
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    crowleysridgegirl
    Reg. Apr 2005
    Posted 2007-09-21 2:58 PM (#68233 - in reply to #68231)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa


    Expert


    Posts: 2614
    2000500100

    Look,bub,I'll get on here whenever I FEEL like it just like everybody else does and express my views anytime I FEEL like it,too,that's another one of my freedoms.

    I didn't turn a thread about "trailers" into a feable (mispelled incidentally) attempt to do anything about politics.I don't recall any political discussion occurring here.The thread isn't about "trailers" to begin with,it is about laws that affect trailer/horse haulers,and the attempts are to decipher the way that the DOT agents are handling these laws,right,wrong,or whatever.

    Maybe you better go back and read from the first,wise guy.

    Don't be telling me what to do or not do,either.What the *!@# were YOU doing on 9/11? I was probably getting ready to go take care of some sick folks like I've been doing for 36 yrs as a nurse.

    Whose hero are YOU,anyway???????



    Edited by crowleysridgegirl 2007-09-21 3:08 PM
    share Top of the page Bottom of the page
    DaveM
    Reg. Sep 2003
    Posted 2007-09-21 3:15 PM (#68234 - in reply to #68233)
    Subject: RE: Trouble hauling through Iowa



    Elite Veteran


    Posts: 720
    500100100
    Location: Never miss a good chance to shut up.

    Looks to me like there is some excellent information on this thread that should remain available to all.  Unfortunately, we've had a minor skirmish break out in the kitchen and we'll have to close this down for public safety.  I'll leave it up for viewing and reference. 

     

    share Top of the page Bottom of the page